Cargando…
Are there increased periprocedural complications with the MRI-conditional Medtronic Revo SureScan Pacing System?: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-conditional permanent pacemakers has increased significantly. In this meta-analysis, we examine the safety of MRI-conditional pacing systems in comparison with conventional systems. METHODS: An electronic search was performed using major databa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29411288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-018-1086-4 |
_version_ | 1783316020711129088 |
---|---|
author | Shurrab, M. Kaoutskaia, A. Baranchuk, A. Lau, C. Singarajah, T. Lashevsky, I. Newman, D. Healey, J. S. Crystal, E. |
author_facet | Shurrab, M. Kaoutskaia, A. Baranchuk, A. Lau, C. Singarajah, T. Lashevsky, I. Newman, D. Healey, J. S. Crystal, E. |
author_sort | Shurrab, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-conditional permanent pacemakers has increased significantly. In this meta-analysis, we examine the safety of MRI-conditional pacing systems in comparison with conventional systems. METHODS: An electronic search was performed using major databases, including studies that compared the outcomes of interest between patients receiving MRI-conditional pacemakers (MRI group) versus conventional pacemakers (control group). RESULTS: Six studies (5 retrospective and 1 prospective non-randomised) involving 2,118 adult patients were identified. The MRI-conditional pacemakers, deployed in 969 patients, were all from a single manufacturer (Medtronic Pacing System with 5086 leads). The rate of pacemaker lead dislodgement (atrial and ventricular) was significantly higher in the MRI group (3% vs. 1%, OR 2.47 (95% CI 1.26; 4.83), p = 0.008). The MRI group had a significantly higher rate of pericardial complications (2% vs. 1%, OR 4.23 (95% CI 1.18; 15.10), p = 0.03) and a numerically higher overall complication rate in comparison with the conventional group (6% vs. 3%, OR 2.02 (95% CI 0.88; 4.66), p = 0.10) but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, the rates of pacemaker lead dislodgement and pericardial complications were significantly higher with the Medtronic MRI-conditional pacing system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5910305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59103052018-04-24 Are there increased periprocedural complications with the MRI-conditional Medtronic Revo SureScan Pacing System?: A meta-analysis Shurrab, M. Kaoutskaia, A. Baranchuk, A. Lau, C. Singarajah, T. Lashevsky, I. Newman, D. Healey, J. S. Crystal, E. Neth Heart J Review Article BACKGROUND: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-conditional permanent pacemakers has increased significantly. In this meta-analysis, we examine the safety of MRI-conditional pacing systems in comparison with conventional systems. METHODS: An electronic search was performed using major databases, including studies that compared the outcomes of interest between patients receiving MRI-conditional pacemakers (MRI group) versus conventional pacemakers (control group). RESULTS: Six studies (5 retrospective and 1 prospective non-randomised) involving 2,118 adult patients were identified. The MRI-conditional pacemakers, deployed in 969 patients, were all from a single manufacturer (Medtronic Pacing System with 5086 leads). The rate of pacemaker lead dislodgement (atrial and ventricular) was significantly higher in the MRI group (3% vs. 1%, OR 2.47 (95% CI 1.26; 4.83), p = 0.008). The MRI group had a significantly higher rate of pericardial complications (2% vs. 1%, OR 4.23 (95% CI 1.18; 15.10), p = 0.03) and a numerically higher overall complication rate in comparison with the conventional group (6% vs. 3%, OR 2.02 (95% CI 0.88; 4.66), p = 0.10) but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, the rates of pacemaker lead dislodgement and pericardial complications were significantly higher with the Medtronic MRI-conditional pacing system. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2018-02-06 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5910305/ /pubmed/29411288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-018-1086-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Shurrab, M. Kaoutskaia, A. Baranchuk, A. Lau, C. Singarajah, T. Lashevsky, I. Newman, D. Healey, J. S. Crystal, E. Are there increased periprocedural complications with the MRI-conditional Medtronic Revo SureScan Pacing System?: A meta-analysis |
title | Are there increased periprocedural complications with the MRI-conditional Medtronic Revo SureScan Pacing System?: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Are there increased periprocedural complications with the MRI-conditional Medtronic Revo SureScan Pacing System?: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Are there increased periprocedural complications with the MRI-conditional Medtronic Revo SureScan Pacing System?: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Are there increased periprocedural complications with the MRI-conditional Medtronic Revo SureScan Pacing System?: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Are there increased periprocedural complications with the MRI-conditional Medtronic Revo SureScan Pacing System?: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | are there increased periprocedural complications with the mri-conditional medtronic revo surescan pacing system?: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29411288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-018-1086-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shurrabm arethereincreasedperiproceduralcomplicationswiththemriconditionalmedtronicrevosurescanpacingsystemametaanalysis AT kaoutskaiaa arethereincreasedperiproceduralcomplicationswiththemriconditionalmedtronicrevosurescanpacingsystemametaanalysis AT baranchuka arethereincreasedperiproceduralcomplicationswiththemriconditionalmedtronicrevosurescanpacingsystemametaanalysis AT lauc arethereincreasedperiproceduralcomplicationswiththemriconditionalmedtronicrevosurescanpacingsystemametaanalysis AT singarajaht arethereincreasedperiproceduralcomplicationswiththemriconditionalmedtronicrevosurescanpacingsystemametaanalysis AT lashevskyi arethereincreasedperiproceduralcomplicationswiththemriconditionalmedtronicrevosurescanpacingsystemametaanalysis AT newmand arethereincreasedperiproceduralcomplicationswiththemriconditionalmedtronicrevosurescanpacingsystemametaanalysis AT healeyjs arethereincreasedperiproceduralcomplicationswiththemriconditionalmedtronicrevosurescanpacingsystemametaanalysis AT crystale arethereincreasedperiproceduralcomplicationswiththemriconditionalmedtronicrevosurescanpacingsystemametaanalysis |