Cargando…
Detection and quantification of flow consistency in business process models
Business process models abstract complex business processes by representing them as graphical models. Their layout, as determined by the modeler, may have an effect when these models are used. However, this effect is currently not fully understood. In order to systematically study this effect, a bas...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29706860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-017-0576-y |
_version_ | 1783316052192526336 |
---|---|
author | Burattin, Andrea Bernstein, Vered Neurauter, Manuel Soffer, Pnina Weber, Barbara |
author_facet | Burattin, Andrea Bernstein, Vered Neurauter, Manuel Soffer, Pnina Weber, Barbara |
author_sort | Burattin, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Business process models abstract complex business processes by representing them as graphical models. Their layout, as determined by the modeler, may have an effect when these models are used. However, this effect is currently not fully understood. In order to systematically study this effect, a basic set of measurable key visual features is proposed, depicting the layout properties that are meaningful to the human user. The aim of this research is thus twofold: first, to empirically identify key visual features of business process models which are perceived as meaningful to the user and second, to show how such features can be quantified into computational metrics, which are applicable to business process models. We focus on one particular feature, consistency of flow direction, and show the challenges that arise when transforming it into a precise metric. We propose three different metrics addressing these challenges, each following a different view of flow consistency. We then report the results of an empirical evaluation, which indicates which metric is more effective in predicting the human perception of this feature. Moreover, two other automatic evaluations describing the performance and the computational capabilities of our metrics are reported as well. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5910466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59104662018-04-24 Detection and quantification of flow consistency in business process models Burattin, Andrea Bernstein, Vered Neurauter, Manuel Soffer, Pnina Weber, Barbara Softw Syst Model Special Section Paper Business process models abstract complex business processes by representing them as graphical models. Their layout, as determined by the modeler, may have an effect when these models are used. However, this effect is currently not fully understood. In order to systematically study this effect, a basic set of measurable key visual features is proposed, depicting the layout properties that are meaningful to the human user. The aim of this research is thus twofold: first, to empirically identify key visual features of business process models which are perceived as meaningful to the user and second, to show how such features can be quantified into computational metrics, which are applicable to business process models. We focus on one particular feature, consistency of flow direction, and show the challenges that arise when transforming it into a precise metric. We propose three different metrics addressing these challenges, each following a different view of flow consistency. We then report the results of an empirical evaluation, which indicates which metric is more effective in predicting the human perception of this feature. Moreover, two other automatic evaluations describing the performance and the computational capabilities of our metrics are reported as well. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-01-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5910466/ /pubmed/29706860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-017-0576-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Special Section Paper Burattin, Andrea Bernstein, Vered Neurauter, Manuel Soffer, Pnina Weber, Barbara Detection and quantification of flow consistency in business process models |
title | Detection and quantification of flow consistency in business process models |
title_full | Detection and quantification of flow consistency in business process models |
title_fullStr | Detection and quantification of flow consistency in business process models |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection and quantification of flow consistency in business process models |
title_short | Detection and quantification of flow consistency in business process models |
title_sort | detection and quantification of flow consistency in business process models |
topic | Special Section Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29706860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-017-0576-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burattinandrea detectionandquantificationofflowconsistencyinbusinessprocessmodels AT bernsteinvered detectionandquantificationofflowconsistencyinbusinessprocessmodels AT neurautermanuel detectionandquantificationofflowconsistencyinbusinessprocessmodels AT sofferpnina detectionandquantificationofflowconsistencyinbusinessprocessmodels AT weberbarbara detectionandquantificationofflowconsistencyinbusinessprocessmodels |