Cargando…
Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis
AIM: To evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs on postoperative complications of pancreatic surgery. METHODS: Computer searches were performed in databases (including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase) for randomized controlled trials or case-control studies describ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i15.1666 |
_version_ | 1783316072756150272 |
---|---|
author | Ji, Hai-Bin Zhu, Wen-Tao Wei, Qiang Wang, Xiao-Xiao Wang, Hai-Bin Chen, Qiang-Pu |
author_facet | Ji, Hai-Bin Zhu, Wen-Tao Wei, Qiang Wang, Xiao-Xiao Wang, Hai-Bin Chen, Qiang-Pu |
author_sort | Ji, Hai-Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs on postoperative complications of pancreatic surgery. METHODS: Computer searches were performed in databases (including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase) for randomized controlled trials or case-control studies describing ERAS programs in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery published between January 1995 and August 2017. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the studies’ extracted data that met the inclusion criteria and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan5.3.5 software. Forest plots, demonstrating the outcomes of the ERAS group vs the control group after pancreatic surgery, and funnel plots were used to evaluate potential publication bias. RESULTS: Twenty case-control studies including 3694 patients, published between January 1995 and August 2017, were selected for the meta-analysis. This study included the ERAS group (n = 1886) and the control group (n = 1808), which adopted the traditional perioperative management. Compared to the control group, the ERAS group had lower delayed gastric emptying rates [odds ratio (OR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.72, P < 0.00001], lower postoperative complication rates (OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.45-0.72, P < 0.00001), particularly for the mild postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo I-II) (OR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.58-0.88, P = 0.002), lower abdominal infection rates (OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.54-0.90, P = 0.006), and shorter postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS) (WMD = -4.45, 95%CI: -5.99 to -2.91, P < 0.00001). However, there were no significant differences in complications, such as, postoperative pancreatic fistulas, moderate to severe complications (Clavien-Dindo III- V), mortality, readmission and unintended reoperation, in both groups. CONCLUSION: The perioperative implementation of ERAS programs in pancreatic surgery is safe and effective, can decrease postoperative complication rates, and can promote recovery for patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5910550 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59105502018-04-23 Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis Ji, Hai-Bin Zhu, Wen-Tao Wei, Qiang Wang, Xiao-Xiao Wang, Hai-Bin Chen, Qiang-Pu World J Gastroenterol Meta-Analysis AIM: To evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs on postoperative complications of pancreatic surgery. METHODS: Computer searches were performed in databases (including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase) for randomized controlled trials or case-control studies describing ERAS programs in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery published between January 1995 and August 2017. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the studies’ extracted data that met the inclusion criteria and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan5.3.5 software. Forest plots, demonstrating the outcomes of the ERAS group vs the control group after pancreatic surgery, and funnel plots were used to evaluate potential publication bias. RESULTS: Twenty case-control studies including 3694 patients, published between January 1995 and August 2017, were selected for the meta-analysis. This study included the ERAS group (n = 1886) and the control group (n = 1808), which adopted the traditional perioperative management. Compared to the control group, the ERAS group had lower delayed gastric emptying rates [odds ratio (OR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.72, P < 0.00001], lower postoperative complication rates (OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.45-0.72, P < 0.00001), particularly for the mild postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo I-II) (OR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.58-0.88, P = 0.002), lower abdominal infection rates (OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.54-0.90, P = 0.006), and shorter postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS) (WMD = -4.45, 95%CI: -5.99 to -2.91, P < 0.00001). However, there were no significant differences in complications, such as, postoperative pancreatic fistulas, moderate to severe complications (Clavien-Dindo III- V), mortality, readmission and unintended reoperation, in both groups. CONCLUSION: The perioperative implementation of ERAS programs in pancreatic surgery is safe and effective, can decrease postoperative complication rates, and can promote recovery for patients. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-04-21 2018-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5910550/ /pubmed/29686474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i15.1666 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Ji, Hai-Bin Zhu, Wen-Tao Wei, Qiang Wang, Xiao-Xiao Wang, Hai-Bin Chen, Qiang-Pu Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis |
title | Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: a meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i15.1666 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jihaibin impactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramsonpancreaticsurgeryametaanalysis AT zhuwentao impactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramsonpancreaticsurgeryametaanalysis AT weiqiang impactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramsonpancreaticsurgeryametaanalysis AT wangxiaoxiao impactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramsonpancreaticsurgeryametaanalysis AT wanghaibin impactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramsonpancreaticsurgeryametaanalysis AT chenqiangpu impactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramsonpancreaticsurgeryametaanalysis |