Cargando…

Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs on postoperative complications of pancreatic surgery. METHODS: Computer searches were performed in databases (including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase) for randomized controlled trials or case-control studies describ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ji, Hai-Bin, Zhu, Wen-Tao, Wei, Qiang, Wang, Xiao-Xiao, Wang, Hai-Bin, Chen, Qiang-Pu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i15.1666
_version_ 1783316072756150272
author Ji, Hai-Bin
Zhu, Wen-Tao
Wei, Qiang
Wang, Xiao-Xiao
Wang, Hai-Bin
Chen, Qiang-Pu
author_facet Ji, Hai-Bin
Zhu, Wen-Tao
Wei, Qiang
Wang, Xiao-Xiao
Wang, Hai-Bin
Chen, Qiang-Pu
author_sort Ji, Hai-Bin
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs on postoperative complications of pancreatic surgery. METHODS: Computer searches were performed in databases (including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase) for randomized controlled trials or case-control studies describing ERAS programs in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery published between January 1995 and August 2017. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the studies’ extracted data that met the inclusion criteria and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan5.3.5 software. Forest plots, demonstrating the outcomes of the ERAS group vs the control group after pancreatic surgery, and funnel plots were used to evaluate potential publication bias. RESULTS: Twenty case-control studies including 3694 patients, published between January 1995 and August 2017, were selected for the meta-analysis. This study included the ERAS group (n = 1886) and the control group (n = 1808), which adopted the traditional perioperative management. Compared to the control group, the ERAS group had lower delayed gastric emptying rates [odds ratio (OR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.72, P < 0.00001], lower postoperative complication rates (OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.45-0.72, P < 0.00001), particularly for the mild postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo I-II) (OR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.58-0.88, P = 0.002), lower abdominal infection rates (OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.54-0.90, P = 0.006), and shorter postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS) (WMD = -4.45, 95%CI: -5.99 to -2.91, P < 0.00001). However, there were no significant differences in complications, such as, postoperative pancreatic fistulas, moderate to severe complications (Clavien-Dindo III- V), mortality, readmission and unintended reoperation, in both groups. CONCLUSION: The perioperative implementation of ERAS programs in pancreatic surgery is safe and effective, can decrease postoperative complication rates, and can promote recovery for patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5910550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59105502018-04-23 Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis Ji, Hai-Bin Zhu, Wen-Tao Wei, Qiang Wang, Xiao-Xiao Wang, Hai-Bin Chen, Qiang-Pu World J Gastroenterol Meta-Analysis AIM: To evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs on postoperative complications of pancreatic surgery. METHODS: Computer searches were performed in databases (including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase) for randomized controlled trials or case-control studies describing ERAS programs in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery published between January 1995 and August 2017. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the studies’ extracted data that met the inclusion criteria and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan5.3.5 software. Forest plots, demonstrating the outcomes of the ERAS group vs the control group after pancreatic surgery, and funnel plots were used to evaluate potential publication bias. RESULTS: Twenty case-control studies including 3694 patients, published between January 1995 and August 2017, were selected for the meta-analysis. This study included the ERAS group (n = 1886) and the control group (n = 1808), which adopted the traditional perioperative management. Compared to the control group, the ERAS group had lower delayed gastric emptying rates [odds ratio (OR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.72, P < 0.00001], lower postoperative complication rates (OR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.45-0.72, P < 0.00001), particularly for the mild postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo I-II) (OR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.58-0.88, P = 0.002), lower abdominal infection rates (OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.54-0.90, P = 0.006), and shorter postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS) (WMD = -4.45, 95%CI: -5.99 to -2.91, P < 0.00001). However, there were no significant differences in complications, such as, postoperative pancreatic fistulas, moderate to severe complications (Clavien-Dindo III- V), mortality, readmission and unintended reoperation, in both groups. CONCLUSION: The perioperative implementation of ERAS programs in pancreatic surgery is safe and effective, can decrease postoperative complication rates, and can promote recovery for patients. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-04-21 2018-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5910550/ /pubmed/29686474 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i15.1666 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Ji, Hai-Bin
Zhu, Wen-Tao
Wei, Qiang
Wang, Xiao-Xiao
Wang, Hai-Bin
Chen, Qiang-Pu
Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis
title Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis
title_full Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis
title_short Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis
title_sort impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: a meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29686474
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i15.1666
work_keys_str_mv AT jihaibin impactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramsonpancreaticsurgeryametaanalysis
AT zhuwentao impactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramsonpancreaticsurgeryametaanalysis
AT weiqiang impactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramsonpancreaticsurgeryametaanalysis
AT wangxiaoxiao impactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramsonpancreaticsurgeryametaanalysis
AT wanghaibin impactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramsonpancreaticsurgeryametaanalysis
AT chenqiangpu impactofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprogramsonpancreaticsurgeryametaanalysis