Cargando…

Self-reported functional recovery after reconstruction versus repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ROTOR): a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is today’s surgical gold standard for ACL rupture. Although it provides satisfactory results, not all patients return to their previous activity level and moreover, early posttraumatic osteoarthritis is not prevented. As such, a renewed int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boer, Barbara C., Hoogeslag, Roy A. G., Brouwer, Reinoud W., Demmer, Anna, Huis in ‘t Veld, Rianne M. H. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29678170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2028-4
_version_ 1783316078185676800
author Boer, Barbara C.
Hoogeslag, Roy A. G.
Brouwer, Reinoud W.
Demmer, Anna
Huis in ‘t Veld, Rianne M. H. A.
author_facet Boer, Barbara C.
Hoogeslag, Roy A. G.
Brouwer, Reinoud W.
Demmer, Anna
Huis in ‘t Veld, Rianne M. H. A.
author_sort Boer, Barbara C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is today’s surgical gold standard for ACL rupture. Although it provides satisfactory results, not all patients return to their previous activity level and moreover, early posttraumatic osteoarthritis is not prevented. As such, a renewed interest has emerged in ACL suture repair combined with dynamic augmentation. Compared to ACL reconstruction, the hypothesized advantages of ACL suture repair are earlier return to sports, reduction of early posttraumatic osteoarthritis and preservation of the patient’s native ACL tissue and proprioceptive envelope of the knee. In recent literature, ACL suture repair combined with dynamic augmentation tends to be at least equally effective compared to ACL reconstruction, but no randomized comparative study has yet been conducted. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a prospective, stratified, block randomized controlled trial. Forty-eight patients with an ACL rupture will be assigned to either a suture repair group with dynamic augmentation and microfracture of the femoral notch, or an ACL reconstruction group with autologous semitendinosis graft and all-inside technique. The primary objective is to investigate the hypothesis that suture repair of a ruptured ACL results in at least equal effectiveness compared with an ACL reconstruction in terms of patient self-reported outcomes (IKDC 2000 subjective scale) 1 year postoperatively. Secondary objectives are to evaluate patient self-reported outcomes (IKDC 2000, KOOS, Tegner, VAS), re-rupture rate, rehabilitation time required for return to daily and sports activities, achieved levels of sports activity, clinimetrics (Rolimeter, LSI, Isoforce) and development of osteoarthritis, at short term (6 weeks, 3, 6 and 9 months and 1 year), midterm (2 and 5 years) and long term (10 years) postoperatively. DISCUSSION: A renewed interest has emerged in ACL suture repair combined with dynamic augmentation in the treatment of ACL rupture. Recent cohort studies show good short- and midterm results for this technique. This randomized controlled trial has been designed to compare the outcome of suture repair of a ruptured ACL, combined with DIS as well as microfracture of the femoral notch, with ACL reconstruction using autologous semitendinosus. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Register NCT02310854 (retrospectively registered on December 1st, 2014).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5910573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59105732018-05-02 Self-reported functional recovery after reconstruction versus repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ROTOR): a randomized controlled clinical trial Boer, Barbara C. Hoogeslag, Roy A. G. Brouwer, Reinoud W. Demmer, Anna Huis in ‘t Veld, Rianne M. H. A. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is today’s surgical gold standard for ACL rupture. Although it provides satisfactory results, not all patients return to their previous activity level and moreover, early posttraumatic osteoarthritis is not prevented. As such, a renewed interest has emerged in ACL suture repair combined with dynamic augmentation. Compared to ACL reconstruction, the hypothesized advantages of ACL suture repair are earlier return to sports, reduction of early posttraumatic osteoarthritis and preservation of the patient’s native ACL tissue and proprioceptive envelope of the knee. In recent literature, ACL suture repair combined with dynamic augmentation tends to be at least equally effective compared to ACL reconstruction, but no randomized comparative study has yet been conducted. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a prospective, stratified, block randomized controlled trial. Forty-eight patients with an ACL rupture will be assigned to either a suture repair group with dynamic augmentation and microfracture of the femoral notch, or an ACL reconstruction group with autologous semitendinosis graft and all-inside technique. The primary objective is to investigate the hypothesis that suture repair of a ruptured ACL results in at least equal effectiveness compared with an ACL reconstruction in terms of patient self-reported outcomes (IKDC 2000 subjective scale) 1 year postoperatively. Secondary objectives are to evaluate patient self-reported outcomes (IKDC 2000, KOOS, Tegner, VAS), re-rupture rate, rehabilitation time required for return to daily and sports activities, achieved levels of sports activity, clinimetrics (Rolimeter, LSI, Isoforce) and development of osteoarthritis, at short term (6 weeks, 3, 6 and 9 months and 1 year), midterm (2 and 5 years) and long term (10 years) postoperatively. DISCUSSION: A renewed interest has emerged in ACL suture repair combined with dynamic augmentation in the treatment of ACL rupture. Recent cohort studies show good short- and midterm results for this technique. This randomized controlled trial has been designed to compare the outcome of suture repair of a ruptured ACL, combined with DIS as well as microfracture of the femoral notch, with ACL reconstruction using autologous semitendinosus. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Register NCT02310854 (retrospectively registered on December 1st, 2014). BioMed Central 2018-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5910573/ /pubmed/29678170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2028-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Boer, Barbara C.
Hoogeslag, Roy A. G.
Brouwer, Reinoud W.
Demmer, Anna
Huis in ‘t Veld, Rianne M. H. A.
Self-reported functional recovery after reconstruction versus repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ROTOR): a randomized controlled clinical trial
title Self-reported functional recovery after reconstruction versus repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ROTOR): a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Self-reported functional recovery after reconstruction versus repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ROTOR): a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Self-reported functional recovery after reconstruction versus repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ROTOR): a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Self-reported functional recovery after reconstruction versus repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ROTOR): a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Self-reported functional recovery after reconstruction versus repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ROTOR): a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort self-reported functional recovery after reconstruction versus repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture (rotor): a randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29678170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2028-4
work_keys_str_mv AT boerbarbarac selfreportedfunctionalrecoveryafterreconstructionversusrepairinacuteanteriorcruciateligamentrupturerotorarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT hoogeslagroyag selfreportedfunctionalrecoveryafterreconstructionversusrepairinacuteanteriorcruciateligamentrupturerotorarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT brouwerreinoudw selfreportedfunctionalrecoveryafterreconstructionversusrepairinacuteanteriorcruciateligamentrupturerotorarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT demmeranna selfreportedfunctionalrecoveryafterreconstructionversusrepairinacuteanteriorcruciateligamentrupturerotorarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT huisintveldriannemha selfreportedfunctionalrecoveryafterreconstructionversusrepairinacuteanteriorcruciateligamentrupturerotorarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial