Cargando…

Protocol based evaluation for feasibility of extubation compared to clinical scoring systems after major oral cancer surgery safely reduces the need for tracheostomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Despite risks, complications and negative impact to quality of life, tracheostomy is widely used to bypass upper airway obstruction after major oral cancer surgery (MOCS). Decision to tracheostomy is frequently based on clinical scoring systems which mainly have not been validated by dif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmutz, Axel, Dieterich, Rolf, Kalbhenn, Johannes, Voss, Pit, Loop, Torsten, Heinrich, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29678147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0506-8
_version_ 1783316082978717696
author Schmutz, Axel
Dieterich, Rolf
Kalbhenn, Johannes
Voss, Pit
Loop, Torsten
Heinrich, Sebastian
author_facet Schmutz, Axel
Dieterich, Rolf
Kalbhenn, Johannes
Voss, Pit
Loop, Torsten
Heinrich, Sebastian
author_sort Schmutz, Axel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite risks, complications and negative impact to quality of life, tracheostomy is widely used to bypass upper airway obstruction after major oral cancer surgery (MOCS). Decision to tracheostomy is frequently based on clinical scoring systems which mainly have not been validated by different cohorts. Delayed extubation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) may be a suitable alternative in selected cases. We hypothesize that delayed routine ICU extubation after MOCS instead of scoring system based tracheostomy is safe, feasible and leads to lower tracheostomy rates. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed our clinical protocol which provides routine extubation of patients after MOCS in the ICU. The primary outcome measure was a composite of early reintubation within 24 h or secondary tracheostomy. Secondary outcome measures included airway obstruction related morbidity and mortality. Predictor variables included tumor localisation, surgical procedure and reconstruction method, length of operation and pre-existing morbidity. Furthermore we assessed the ability of four clinical scoring systems to identify patients requiring secondary tracheostomy. Statistical processing includes basic descriptive statistics, Chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty four cases were enclosed to this retrospective study. Fourteen patients (6%) required secondary tracheostomy, Ten patients (4%) required reintubation within 24 h after extubation. No airway obstruction associated mortality, morbidity and cannot intubate cannot ventilate situation was observed. Seventy five percent of the patients were extubated within 17 h after ICU admission. All evaluated scores showed a poor positive predictive value (0.08 to 0.18) with a sensitivity ranged from 0.13 to 0.63 and specificity ranged from 0.5 to 0.93. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that common clinical scoring systems fail to prevent tracheostomy in patients after MOCS. Application of scoring systems may lead to a higher number of unnecessary tracheostomies. Delayed routine extubation in the ICU after MOCS seems an appropriate and safe approach to avoid tracheostomy and the related morbidity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0506-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5910593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59105932018-05-02 Protocol based evaluation for feasibility of extubation compared to clinical scoring systems after major oral cancer surgery safely reduces the need for tracheostomy: a retrospective cohort study Schmutz, Axel Dieterich, Rolf Kalbhenn, Johannes Voss, Pit Loop, Torsten Heinrich, Sebastian BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite risks, complications and negative impact to quality of life, tracheostomy is widely used to bypass upper airway obstruction after major oral cancer surgery (MOCS). Decision to tracheostomy is frequently based on clinical scoring systems which mainly have not been validated by different cohorts. Delayed extubation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) may be a suitable alternative in selected cases. We hypothesize that delayed routine ICU extubation after MOCS instead of scoring system based tracheostomy is safe, feasible and leads to lower tracheostomy rates. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed our clinical protocol which provides routine extubation of patients after MOCS in the ICU. The primary outcome measure was a composite of early reintubation within 24 h or secondary tracheostomy. Secondary outcome measures included airway obstruction related morbidity and mortality. Predictor variables included tumor localisation, surgical procedure and reconstruction method, length of operation and pre-existing morbidity. Furthermore we assessed the ability of four clinical scoring systems to identify patients requiring secondary tracheostomy. Statistical processing includes basic descriptive statistics, Chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty four cases were enclosed to this retrospective study. Fourteen patients (6%) required secondary tracheostomy, Ten patients (4%) required reintubation within 24 h after extubation. No airway obstruction associated mortality, morbidity and cannot intubate cannot ventilate situation was observed. Seventy five percent of the patients were extubated within 17 h after ICU admission. All evaluated scores showed a poor positive predictive value (0.08 to 0.18) with a sensitivity ranged from 0.13 to 0.63 and specificity ranged from 0.5 to 0.93. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that common clinical scoring systems fail to prevent tracheostomy in patients after MOCS. Application of scoring systems may lead to a higher number of unnecessary tracheostomies. Delayed routine extubation in the ICU after MOCS seems an appropriate and safe approach to avoid tracheostomy and the related morbidity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0506-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5910593/ /pubmed/29678147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0506-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schmutz, Axel
Dieterich, Rolf
Kalbhenn, Johannes
Voss, Pit
Loop, Torsten
Heinrich, Sebastian
Protocol based evaluation for feasibility of extubation compared to clinical scoring systems after major oral cancer surgery safely reduces the need for tracheostomy: a retrospective cohort study
title Protocol based evaluation for feasibility of extubation compared to clinical scoring systems after major oral cancer surgery safely reduces the need for tracheostomy: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Protocol based evaluation for feasibility of extubation compared to clinical scoring systems after major oral cancer surgery safely reduces the need for tracheostomy: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Protocol based evaluation for feasibility of extubation compared to clinical scoring systems after major oral cancer surgery safely reduces the need for tracheostomy: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Protocol based evaluation for feasibility of extubation compared to clinical scoring systems after major oral cancer surgery safely reduces the need for tracheostomy: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Protocol based evaluation for feasibility of extubation compared to clinical scoring systems after major oral cancer surgery safely reduces the need for tracheostomy: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort protocol based evaluation for feasibility of extubation compared to clinical scoring systems after major oral cancer surgery safely reduces the need for tracheostomy: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29678147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0506-8
work_keys_str_mv AT schmutzaxel protocolbasedevaluationforfeasibilityofextubationcomparedtoclinicalscoringsystemsaftermajororalcancersurgerysafelyreducestheneedfortracheostomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dieterichrolf protocolbasedevaluationforfeasibilityofextubationcomparedtoclinicalscoringsystemsaftermajororalcancersurgerysafelyreducestheneedfortracheostomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kalbhennjohannes protocolbasedevaluationforfeasibilityofextubationcomparedtoclinicalscoringsystemsaftermajororalcancersurgerysafelyreducestheneedfortracheostomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT vosspit protocolbasedevaluationforfeasibilityofextubationcomparedtoclinicalscoringsystemsaftermajororalcancersurgerysafelyreducestheneedfortracheostomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT looptorsten protocolbasedevaluationforfeasibilityofextubationcomparedtoclinicalscoringsystemsaftermajororalcancersurgerysafelyreducestheneedfortracheostomyaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT heinrichsebastian protocolbasedevaluationforfeasibilityofextubationcomparedtoclinicalscoringsystemsaftermajororalcancersurgerysafelyreducestheneedfortracheostomyaretrospectivecohortstudy