Cargando…
Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The role of somatosensory feedback in motor performance has been warranted in the literature. Although sensorimotor deficits are common after stroke, current rehabilitation approaches primarily focus on restoring upper limb motor ability. Evidence for integrative sensorimotor rehabilitat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29678195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2609-4 |
_version_ | 1783316088390418432 |
---|---|
author | De Bruyn, Nele Essers, Bea Thijs, Liselot Van Gils, Annick Tedesco Triccas, Lisa Meyer, Sarah Alaerts, Kaat Verheyden, Geert |
author_facet | De Bruyn, Nele Essers, Bea Thijs, Liselot Van Gils, Annick Tedesco Triccas, Lisa Meyer, Sarah Alaerts, Kaat Verheyden, Geert |
author_sort | De Bruyn, Nele |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The role of somatosensory feedback in motor performance has been warranted in the literature. Although sensorimotor deficits are common after stroke, current rehabilitation approaches primarily focus on restoring upper limb motor ability. Evidence for integrative sensorimotor rehabilitation approaches is scarce, as is knowledge about neural correlates of somatosensory impairments after stroke and the effect of rehabilitation on brain connectivity level. Therefore, we aim to investigate changes in sensorimotor function and brain connectivity following a sensorimotor therapy program compared to an attention-matched motor therapy program for the upper limb after stroke. METHODS: An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Sixty inpatient rehabilitation patients up to eight weeks after stroke will be included. Patients will be randomized to either an experimental group receiving sensorimotor therapy or a control group receiving attention-matched motor therapy for the upper limb, with both groups receiving conventional therapy. Thus, all patients will receive extra therapy, a total of 16 1-h sessions over four weeks. Patients will be assessed at baseline, after four weeks of training, and after four weeks of follow-up. Primary outcome measure is the Action Research Arm Test. Secondary outcome measures will consist of somatosensory, motor and cognitive assessments, and a standardized resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol. DISCUSSION: The integration of sensory and motor rehabilitation into one therapy model might provide the added value of this therapy to improve sensorimotor performance post stroke. Insight in the behavioral and brain connectivity changes post therapy will lead to a better understanding of working mechanisms of therapy and will provide new knowledge for patient-tailored therapy approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03236376. Registered on 8 August 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2609-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5910616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59106162018-05-02 Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial De Bruyn, Nele Essers, Bea Thijs, Liselot Van Gils, Annick Tedesco Triccas, Lisa Meyer, Sarah Alaerts, Kaat Verheyden, Geert Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The role of somatosensory feedback in motor performance has been warranted in the literature. Although sensorimotor deficits are common after stroke, current rehabilitation approaches primarily focus on restoring upper limb motor ability. Evidence for integrative sensorimotor rehabilitation approaches is scarce, as is knowledge about neural correlates of somatosensory impairments after stroke and the effect of rehabilitation on brain connectivity level. Therefore, we aim to investigate changes in sensorimotor function and brain connectivity following a sensorimotor therapy program compared to an attention-matched motor therapy program for the upper limb after stroke. METHODS: An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Sixty inpatient rehabilitation patients up to eight weeks after stroke will be included. Patients will be randomized to either an experimental group receiving sensorimotor therapy or a control group receiving attention-matched motor therapy for the upper limb, with both groups receiving conventional therapy. Thus, all patients will receive extra therapy, a total of 16 1-h sessions over four weeks. Patients will be assessed at baseline, after four weeks of training, and after four weeks of follow-up. Primary outcome measure is the Action Research Arm Test. Secondary outcome measures will consist of somatosensory, motor and cognitive assessments, and a standardized resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol. DISCUSSION: The integration of sensory and motor rehabilitation into one therapy model might provide the added value of this therapy to improve sensorimotor performance post stroke. Insight in the behavioral and brain connectivity changes post therapy will lead to a better understanding of working mechanisms of therapy and will provide new knowledge for patient-tailored therapy approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03236376. Registered on 8 August 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2609-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5910616/ /pubmed/29678195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2609-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol De Bruyn, Nele Essers, Bea Thijs, Liselot Van Gils, Annick Tedesco Triccas, Lisa Meyer, Sarah Alaerts, Kaat Verheyden, Geert Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial |
title | Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | does sensorimotor upper limb therapy post stroke alter behavior and brain connectivity differently compared to motor therapy? protocol of a phase ii randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29678195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2609-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT debruynnele doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT essersbea doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thijsliselot doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vangilsannick doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tedescotriccaslisa doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meyersarah doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT alaertskaat doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial AT verheydengeert doessensorimotorupperlimbtherapypoststrokealterbehaviorandbrainconnectivitydifferentlycomparedtomotortherapyprotocolofaphaseiirandomizedcontrolledtrial |