Cargando…
Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias
One leading hypothesis on the nature of visual callosal connections (CC) is that they replicate features of intrahemispheric lateral connections. However, CC act also in the central part of the binocular visual field. In agreement, early experiments in cats indicated that they provide the ipsilatera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5911488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00011 |
_version_ | 1783316218387628032 |
---|---|
author | Conde-Ocazionez, Sergio A. Jungen, Christiane Wunderle, Thomas Eriksson, David Neuenschwander, Sergio Schmidt, Kerstin E. |
author_facet | Conde-Ocazionez, Sergio A. Jungen, Christiane Wunderle, Thomas Eriksson, David Neuenschwander, Sergio Schmidt, Kerstin E. |
author_sort | Conde-Ocazionez, Sergio A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | One leading hypothesis on the nature of visual callosal connections (CC) is that they replicate features of intrahemispheric lateral connections. However, CC act also in the central part of the binocular visual field. In agreement, early experiments in cats indicated that they provide the ipsilateral eye part of binocular receptive fields (RFs) at the vertical midline (Berlucchi and Rizzolatti, 1968), and play a key role in stereoscopic function. But until today callosal inputs to receptive fields activated by one or both eyes were never compared simultaneously, because callosal function has been often studied by cutting or lesioning either corpus callosum or optic chiasm not allowing such a comparison. To investigate the functional contribution of CC in the intact cat visual system we recorded both monocular and binocular neuronal spiking responses and receptive fields in the 17/18 transition zone during reversible deactivation of the contralateral hemisphere. Unexpectedly from many of the previous reports, we observe no change in ocular dominance during CC deactivation. Throughout the transition zone, a majority of RFs shrink, but several also increase in size. RFs are significantly more affected for ipsi- as opposed to contralateral stimulation, but changes are also observed with binocular stimulation. Noteworthy, RF shrinkages are tiny and not correlated to the profound decreases of monocular and binocular firing rates. They depend more on orientation and direction preference than on eccentricity or ocular dominance of the receiving neuron's RF. Our findings confirm that in binocularly viewing mammals, binocular RFs near the midline are constructed via the direct geniculo-cortical pathway. They also support the idea that input from the two eyes complement each other through CC: Rather than linking parts of RFs separated by the vertical meridian, CC convey a modulatory influence, reflecting the feature selectivity of lateral circuits, with a strong cardinal bias. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5911488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59114882018-04-30 Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias Conde-Ocazionez, Sergio A. Jungen, Christiane Wunderle, Thomas Eriksson, David Neuenschwander, Sergio Schmidt, Kerstin E. Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience One leading hypothesis on the nature of visual callosal connections (CC) is that they replicate features of intrahemispheric lateral connections. However, CC act also in the central part of the binocular visual field. In agreement, early experiments in cats indicated that they provide the ipsilateral eye part of binocular receptive fields (RFs) at the vertical midline (Berlucchi and Rizzolatti, 1968), and play a key role in stereoscopic function. But until today callosal inputs to receptive fields activated by one or both eyes were never compared simultaneously, because callosal function has been often studied by cutting or lesioning either corpus callosum or optic chiasm not allowing such a comparison. To investigate the functional contribution of CC in the intact cat visual system we recorded both monocular and binocular neuronal spiking responses and receptive fields in the 17/18 transition zone during reversible deactivation of the contralateral hemisphere. Unexpectedly from many of the previous reports, we observe no change in ocular dominance during CC deactivation. Throughout the transition zone, a majority of RFs shrink, but several also increase in size. RFs are significantly more affected for ipsi- as opposed to contralateral stimulation, but changes are also observed with binocular stimulation. Noteworthy, RF shrinkages are tiny and not correlated to the profound decreases of monocular and binocular firing rates. They depend more on orientation and direction preference than on eccentricity or ocular dominance of the receiving neuron's RF. Our findings confirm that in binocularly viewing mammals, binocular RFs near the midline are constructed via the direct geniculo-cortical pathway. They also support the idea that input from the two eyes complement each other through CC: Rather than linking parts of RFs separated by the vertical meridian, CC convey a modulatory influence, reflecting the feature selectivity of lateral circuits, with a strong cardinal bias. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5911488/ /pubmed/29713267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00011 Text en Copyright © 2018 Conde-Ocazionez, Jungen, Wunderle, Eriksson, Neuenschwander and Schmidt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Conde-Ocazionez, Sergio A. Jungen, Christiane Wunderle, Thomas Eriksson, David Neuenschwander, Sergio Schmidt, Kerstin E. Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias |
title | Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias |
title_full | Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias |
title_fullStr | Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias |
title_full_unstemmed | Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias |
title_short | Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias |
title_sort | callosal influence on visual receptive fields has an ocular, an orientation-and direction bias |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5911488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT condeocazionezsergioa callosalinfluenceonvisualreceptivefieldshasanocularanorientationanddirectionbias AT jungenchristiane callosalinfluenceonvisualreceptivefieldshasanocularanorientationanddirectionbias AT wunderlethomas callosalinfluenceonvisualreceptivefieldshasanocularanorientationanddirectionbias AT erikssondavid callosalinfluenceonvisualreceptivefieldshasanocularanorientationanddirectionbias AT neuenschwandersergio callosalinfluenceonvisualreceptivefieldshasanocularanorientationanddirectionbias AT schmidtkerstine callosalinfluenceonvisualreceptivefieldshasanocularanorientationanddirectionbias |