Cargando…

Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias

One leading hypothesis on the nature of visual callosal connections (CC) is that they replicate features of intrahemispheric lateral connections. However, CC act also in the central part of the binocular visual field. In agreement, early experiments in cats indicated that they provide the ipsilatera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conde-Ocazionez, Sergio A., Jungen, Christiane, Wunderle, Thomas, Eriksson, David, Neuenschwander, Sergio, Schmidt, Kerstin E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5911488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00011
_version_ 1783316218387628032
author Conde-Ocazionez, Sergio A.
Jungen, Christiane
Wunderle, Thomas
Eriksson, David
Neuenschwander, Sergio
Schmidt, Kerstin E.
author_facet Conde-Ocazionez, Sergio A.
Jungen, Christiane
Wunderle, Thomas
Eriksson, David
Neuenschwander, Sergio
Schmidt, Kerstin E.
author_sort Conde-Ocazionez, Sergio A.
collection PubMed
description One leading hypothesis on the nature of visual callosal connections (CC) is that they replicate features of intrahemispheric lateral connections. However, CC act also in the central part of the binocular visual field. In agreement, early experiments in cats indicated that they provide the ipsilateral eye part of binocular receptive fields (RFs) at the vertical midline (Berlucchi and Rizzolatti, 1968), and play a key role in stereoscopic function. But until today callosal inputs to receptive fields activated by one or both eyes were never compared simultaneously, because callosal function has been often studied by cutting or lesioning either corpus callosum or optic chiasm not allowing such a comparison. To investigate the functional contribution of CC in the intact cat visual system we recorded both monocular and binocular neuronal spiking responses and receptive fields in the 17/18 transition zone during reversible deactivation of the contralateral hemisphere. Unexpectedly from many of the previous reports, we observe no change in ocular dominance during CC deactivation. Throughout the transition zone, a majority of RFs shrink, but several also increase in size. RFs are significantly more affected for ipsi- as opposed to contralateral stimulation, but changes are also observed with binocular stimulation. Noteworthy, RF shrinkages are tiny and not correlated to the profound decreases of monocular and binocular firing rates. They depend more on orientation and direction preference than on eccentricity or ocular dominance of the receiving neuron's RF. Our findings confirm that in binocularly viewing mammals, binocular RFs near the midline are constructed via the direct geniculo-cortical pathway. They also support the idea that input from the two eyes complement each other through CC: Rather than linking parts of RFs separated by the vertical meridian, CC convey a modulatory influence, reflecting the feature selectivity of lateral circuits, with a strong cardinal bias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5911488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59114882018-04-30 Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias Conde-Ocazionez, Sergio A. Jungen, Christiane Wunderle, Thomas Eriksson, David Neuenschwander, Sergio Schmidt, Kerstin E. Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience One leading hypothesis on the nature of visual callosal connections (CC) is that they replicate features of intrahemispheric lateral connections. However, CC act also in the central part of the binocular visual field. In agreement, early experiments in cats indicated that they provide the ipsilateral eye part of binocular receptive fields (RFs) at the vertical midline (Berlucchi and Rizzolatti, 1968), and play a key role in stereoscopic function. But until today callosal inputs to receptive fields activated by one or both eyes were never compared simultaneously, because callosal function has been often studied by cutting or lesioning either corpus callosum or optic chiasm not allowing such a comparison. To investigate the functional contribution of CC in the intact cat visual system we recorded both monocular and binocular neuronal spiking responses and receptive fields in the 17/18 transition zone during reversible deactivation of the contralateral hemisphere. Unexpectedly from many of the previous reports, we observe no change in ocular dominance during CC deactivation. Throughout the transition zone, a majority of RFs shrink, but several also increase in size. RFs are significantly more affected for ipsi- as opposed to contralateral stimulation, but changes are also observed with binocular stimulation. Noteworthy, RF shrinkages are tiny and not correlated to the profound decreases of monocular and binocular firing rates. They depend more on orientation and direction preference than on eccentricity or ocular dominance of the receiving neuron's RF. Our findings confirm that in binocularly viewing mammals, binocular RFs near the midline are constructed via the direct geniculo-cortical pathway. They also support the idea that input from the two eyes complement each other through CC: Rather than linking parts of RFs separated by the vertical meridian, CC convey a modulatory influence, reflecting the feature selectivity of lateral circuits, with a strong cardinal bias. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5911488/ /pubmed/29713267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00011 Text en Copyright © 2018 Conde-Ocazionez, Jungen, Wunderle, Eriksson, Neuenschwander and Schmidt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Conde-Ocazionez, Sergio A.
Jungen, Christiane
Wunderle, Thomas
Eriksson, David
Neuenschwander, Sergio
Schmidt, Kerstin E.
Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias
title Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias
title_full Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias
title_fullStr Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias
title_full_unstemmed Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias
title_short Callosal Influence on Visual Receptive Fields Has an Ocular, an Orientation-and Direction Bias
title_sort callosal influence on visual receptive fields has an ocular, an orientation-and direction bias
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5911488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00011
work_keys_str_mv AT condeocazionezsergioa callosalinfluenceonvisualreceptivefieldshasanocularanorientationanddirectionbias
AT jungenchristiane callosalinfluenceonvisualreceptivefieldshasanocularanorientationanddirectionbias
AT wunderlethomas callosalinfluenceonvisualreceptivefieldshasanocularanorientationanddirectionbias
AT erikssondavid callosalinfluenceonvisualreceptivefieldshasanocularanorientationanddirectionbias
AT neuenschwandersergio callosalinfluenceonvisualreceptivefieldshasanocularanorientationanddirectionbias
AT schmidtkerstine callosalinfluenceonvisualreceptivefieldshasanocularanorientationanddirectionbias