Cargando…

Expanded criteria for active surveillance in prostate cancer: a review of the current data

Over the last ten years, active surveillance (AS) has become increasingly utilized for patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Appropriately selected AS patients have a 10-year prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) approaching 99%. Therefore, some institutions have expanded the inclusion criteri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Cameron, Fam, Mina M., Davies, Benjamin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5911537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732280
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.08.23
_version_ 1783316228940496896
author Jones, Cameron
Fam, Mina M.
Davies, Benjamin J.
author_facet Jones, Cameron
Fam, Mina M.
Davies, Benjamin J.
author_sort Jones, Cameron
collection PubMed
description Over the last ten years, active surveillance (AS) has become increasingly utilized for patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Appropriately selected AS patients have a 10-year prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) approaching 99%. Therefore, some institutions have expanded the inclusion criteria for AS to avoid the unnecessary morbidity associated with overtreatment. In this review, data from several high-quality studies were compiled to demonstrate how AS inclusion criteria may be safely expanded. Although AS criteria, data reporting, and statistical methods were heterogeneous across studies, several findings were consistent and provided insight for clinical practice. Gleason score ≥3+4 and prostate specific antigen density (PSAd) ≥0.15 ng/mL were consistently associated poor oncologic outcomes [biopsy reclassification/progression, adverse pathology at prostatectomy, biochemical recurrence (BCR), and PCSM]. Maximum single-core involvement, number of positive cores, and clinical stage were not consistently associated with negative outcomes. These data support the safety of expanded AS inclusion criteria beyond Epstein’s very low-risk (VLR) criteria to include patients with clinical stage T2, up to 60% maximum core involvement, and up to 4 positive cores (Gleason 3+3 and ≤ PSAd 0.15 ng/mL). Furthermore, although it is clear that patients with intermediate-risk disease have poorer oncologic outcomes compared to low-risk, the absolute 10-year PCSM remains low and select patients may be optimally managed with AS. Although AS utilization is increasing, many men who might be safely managed with AS are still undergoing morbid and unnecessary definitive treatments. Further research into clinical parameters such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and genetic testing is required to improve the accuracy of patient stratification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5911537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59115372018-05-04 Expanded criteria for active surveillance in prostate cancer: a review of the current data Jones, Cameron Fam, Mina M. Davies, Benjamin J. Transl Androl Urol Review Article Over the last ten years, active surveillance (AS) has become increasingly utilized for patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Appropriately selected AS patients have a 10-year prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) approaching 99%. Therefore, some institutions have expanded the inclusion criteria for AS to avoid the unnecessary morbidity associated with overtreatment. In this review, data from several high-quality studies were compiled to demonstrate how AS inclusion criteria may be safely expanded. Although AS criteria, data reporting, and statistical methods were heterogeneous across studies, several findings were consistent and provided insight for clinical practice. Gleason score ≥3+4 and prostate specific antigen density (PSAd) ≥0.15 ng/mL were consistently associated poor oncologic outcomes [biopsy reclassification/progression, adverse pathology at prostatectomy, biochemical recurrence (BCR), and PCSM]. Maximum single-core involvement, number of positive cores, and clinical stage were not consistently associated with negative outcomes. These data support the safety of expanded AS inclusion criteria beyond Epstein’s very low-risk (VLR) criteria to include patients with clinical stage T2, up to 60% maximum core involvement, and up to 4 positive cores (Gleason 3+3 and ≤ PSAd 0.15 ng/mL). Furthermore, although it is clear that patients with intermediate-risk disease have poorer oncologic outcomes compared to low-risk, the absolute 10-year PCSM remains low and select patients may be optimally managed with AS. Although AS utilization is increasing, many men who might be safely managed with AS are still undergoing morbid and unnecessary definitive treatments. Further research into clinical parameters such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and genetic testing is required to improve the accuracy of patient stratification. AME Publishing Company 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5911537/ /pubmed/29732280 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.08.23 Text en 2018 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Review Article
Jones, Cameron
Fam, Mina M.
Davies, Benjamin J.
Expanded criteria for active surveillance in prostate cancer: a review of the current data
title Expanded criteria for active surveillance in prostate cancer: a review of the current data
title_full Expanded criteria for active surveillance in prostate cancer: a review of the current data
title_fullStr Expanded criteria for active surveillance in prostate cancer: a review of the current data
title_full_unstemmed Expanded criteria for active surveillance in prostate cancer: a review of the current data
title_short Expanded criteria for active surveillance in prostate cancer: a review of the current data
title_sort expanded criteria for active surveillance in prostate cancer: a review of the current data
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5911537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732280
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.08.23
work_keys_str_mv AT jonescameron expandedcriteriaforactivesurveillanceinprostatecancerareviewofthecurrentdata
AT famminam expandedcriteriaforactivesurveillanceinprostatecancerareviewofthecurrentdata
AT daviesbenjaminj expandedcriteriaforactivesurveillanceinprostatecancerareviewofthecurrentdata