Cargando…

Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer

Traditional prostate imaging is fairly limited, and only a few imaging modalities have been used for this purpose. Until today, grey scale ultrasound was the most widely used method for the characterization of the prostatic gland, however its limitations for prostate cancer (PCa) detection are well...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velasquez, Maria C., Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana, Venkatramani, Vivek, Nahar, Bruno, Punnen, Sanoj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5911538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732281
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.08.13
_version_ 1783316229176426496
author Velasquez, Maria C.
Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana
Venkatramani, Vivek
Nahar, Bruno
Punnen, Sanoj
author_facet Velasquez, Maria C.
Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana
Venkatramani, Vivek
Nahar, Bruno
Punnen, Sanoj
author_sort Velasquez, Maria C.
collection PubMed
description Traditional prostate imaging is fairly limited, and only a few imaging modalities have been used for this purpose. Until today, grey scale ultrasound was the most widely used method for the characterization of the prostatic gland, however its limitations for prostate cancer (PCa) detection are well known and hence ultrasound is primarily used to localize the prostate and facilitate template prostate biopsies. In the past decade, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has emerged as a promising tool for the detection of PCa. Evidence has shown the value of mpMRI in the active surveillance (AS) population, given its ability to detect more aggressive disease, with data building up and supporting its use for the selection of patients suitable for surveillance. Additionally, mpMRI targeted biopsies have shown an improved detection rate of aggressive PCa when compared to regular transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsies. Current data supports the use of mpMRI in patients considered for AS for reclassification purposes; with a negative mpMRI indicating a decreased risk of reclassification. However, a percentage of patients with negative imaging or low suspicion lesions can experience reclassification, highlighting the importance of repeat confirmatory biopsy regardless of mpMRI findings. At present, no robust data is available to recommend the substitution of regular biopsies with mpMRI in the follow-up of patients on AS and efforts are being made to determine the role of integrating genomic markers with imaging with the objective of minimizing the need of biopsies during the follow up period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5911538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59115382018-05-04 Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer Velasquez, Maria C. Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana Venkatramani, Vivek Nahar, Bruno Punnen, Sanoj Transl Androl Urol Review Article Traditional prostate imaging is fairly limited, and only a few imaging modalities have been used for this purpose. Until today, grey scale ultrasound was the most widely used method for the characterization of the prostatic gland, however its limitations for prostate cancer (PCa) detection are well known and hence ultrasound is primarily used to localize the prostate and facilitate template prostate biopsies. In the past decade, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has emerged as a promising tool for the detection of PCa. Evidence has shown the value of mpMRI in the active surveillance (AS) population, given its ability to detect more aggressive disease, with data building up and supporting its use for the selection of patients suitable for surveillance. Additionally, mpMRI targeted biopsies have shown an improved detection rate of aggressive PCa when compared to regular transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsies. Current data supports the use of mpMRI in patients considered for AS for reclassification purposes; with a negative mpMRI indicating a decreased risk of reclassification. However, a percentage of patients with negative imaging or low suspicion lesions can experience reclassification, highlighting the importance of repeat confirmatory biopsy regardless of mpMRI findings. At present, no robust data is available to recommend the substitution of regular biopsies with mpMRI in the follow-up of patients on AS and efforts are being made to determine the role of integrating genomic markers with imaging with the objective of minimizing the need of biopsies during the follow up period. AME Publishing Company 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5911538/ /pubmed/29732281 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.08.13 Text en 2018 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Review Article
Velasquez, Maria C.
Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana
Venkatramani, Vivek
Nahar, Bruno
Punnen, Sanoj
Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
title Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
title_full Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
title_fullStr Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
title_short Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
title_sort imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5911538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732281
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.08.13
work_keys_str_mv AT velasquezmariac imagingfortheselectionandmonitoringofmenonactivesurveillanceforprostatecancer
AT prakashnachikethsoodana imagingfortheselectionandmonitoringofmenonactivesurveillanceforprostatecancer
AT venkatramanivivek imagingfortheselectionandmonitoringofmenonactivesurveillanceforprostatecancer
AT naharbruno imagingfortheselectionandmonitoringofmenonactivesurveillanceforprostatecancer
AT punnensanoj imagingfortheselectionandmonitoringofmenonactivesurveillanceforprostatecancer