Cargando…
Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer
Traditional prostate imaging is fairly limited, and only a few imaging modalities have been used for this purpose. Until today, grey scale ultrasound was the most widely used method for the characterization of the prostatic gland, however its limitations for prostate cancer (PCa) detection are well...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5911538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732281 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.08.13 |
_version_ | 1783316229176426496 |
---|---|
author | Velasquez, Maria C. Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana Venkatramani, Vivek Nahar, Bruno Punnen, Sanoj |
author_facet | Velasquez, Maria C. Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana Venkatramani, Vivek Nahar, Bruno Punnen, Sanoj |
author_sort | Velasquez, Maria C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traditional prostate imaging is fairly limited, and only a few imaging modalities have been used for this purpose. Until today, grey scale ultrasound was the most widely used method for the characterization of the prostatic gland, however its limitations for prostate cancer (PCa) detection are well known and hence ultrasound is primarily used to localize the prostate and facilitate template prostate biopsies. In the past decade, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has emerged as a promising tool for the detection of PCa. Evidence has shown the value of mpMRI in the active surveillance (AS) population, given its ability to detect more aggressive disease, with data building up and supporting its use for the selection of patients suitable for surveillance. Additionally, mpMRI targeted biopsies have shown an improved detection rate of aggressive PCa when compared to regular transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsies. Current data supports the use of mpMRI in patients considered for AS for reclassification purposes; with a negative mpMRI indicating a decreased risk of reclassification. However, a percentage of patients with negative imaging or low suspicion lesions can experience reclassification, highlighting the importance of repeat confirmatory biopsy regardless of mpMRI findings. At present, no robust data is available to recommend the substitution of regular biopsies with mpMRI in the follow-up of patients on AS and efforts are being made to determine the role of integrating genomic markers with imaging with the objective of minimizing the need of biopsies during the follow up period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5911538 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59115382018-05-04 Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer Velasquez, Maria C. Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana Venkatramani, Vivek Nahar, Bruno Punnen, Sanoj Transl Androl Urol Review Article Traditional prostate imaging is fairly limited, and only a few imaging modalities have been used for this purpose. Until today, grey scale ultrasound was the most widely used method for the characterization of the prostatic gland, however its limitations for prostate cancer (PCa) detection are well known and hence ultrasound is primarily used to localize the prostate and facilitate template prostate biopsies. In the past decade, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has emerged as a promising tool for the detection of PCa. Evidence has shown the value of mpMRI in the active surveillance (AS) population, given its ability to detect more aggressive disease, with data building up and supporting its use for the selection of patients suitable for surveillance. Additionally, mpMRI targeted biopsies have shown an improved detection rate of aggressive PCa when compared to regular transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsies. Current data supports the use of mpMRI in patients considered for AS for reclassification purposes; with a negative mpMRI indicating a decreased risk of reclassification. However, a percentage of patients with negative imaging or low suspicion lesions can experience reclassification, highlighting the importance of repeat confirmatory biopsy regardless of mpMRI findings. At present, no robust data is available to recommend the substitution of regular biopsies with mpMRI in the follow-up of patients on AS and efforts are being made to determine the role of integrating genomic markers with imaging with the objective of minimizing the need of biopsies during the follow up period. AME Publishing Company 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5911538/ /pubmed/29732281 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.08.13 Text en 2018 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Velasquez, Maria C. Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana Venkatramani, Vivek Nahar, Bruno Punnen, Sanoj Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer |
title | Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer |
title_full | Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer |
title_short | Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer |
title_sort | imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5911538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732281 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.08.13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT velasquezmariac imagingfortheselectionandmonitoringofmenonactivesurveillanceforprostatecancer AT prakashnachikethsoodana imagingfortheselectionandmonitoringofmenonactivesurveillanceforprostatecancer AT venkatramanivivek imagingfortheselectionandmonitoringofmenonactivesurveillanceforprostatecancer AT naharbruno imagingfortheselectionandmonitoringofmenonactivesurveillanceforprostatecancer AT punnensanoj imagingfortheselectionandmonitoringofmenonactivesurveillanceforprostatecancer |