Cargando…

Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and computed tomography findings between signet ring cell carcinoma and nonsignet ring cell carcinoma in early and advanced gastric cancer

Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) of the stomach is a histological type based on microscopic characteristics. SRC's clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis are still controversial. Our study is to describe the clinicopathological features and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jian, Cai, Rong, Ren, Gang, Zhao, Jianxi, Li, Huali, Guo, Chen, He, Wenguang, Wu, Xiangru, Zhang, Wenjie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5911613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29533002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1417
_version_ 1783316242439864320
author Chen, Jian
Cai, Rong
Ren, Gang
Zhao, Jianxi
Li, Huali
Guo, Chen
He, Wenguang
Wu, Xiangru
Zhang, Wenjie
author_facet Chen, Jian
Cai, Rong
Ren, Gang
Zhao, Jianxi
Li, Huali
Guo, Chen
He, Wenguang
Wu, Xiangru
Zhang, Wenjie
author_sort Chen, Jian
collection PubMed
description Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) of the stomach is a histological type based on microscopic characteristics. SRC's clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis are still controversial. Our study is to describe the clinicopathological features and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings of patients with SRC of the stomach in comparison with nonsignet ring cell adenocarcinoma (NSRC). We retrospectively analyzed data from 241 patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy, including 62 SRC and 179 NSRC. Clinicopathological outcomes and MDCT findings were evaluated, and we investigated whether these variables were correlated with histopathological type. In early gastric carcinoma, patients with SRC were younger (50.2 vs. 60.2 years; P = 0.000) and more likely to be observed in the middle and lower third stomach (P = 0.010). Early SRC had a tendency to be confined to the mucosa (82.1%). There were significant differences in degree of enhancement between early SRC and NSRC on MDCT imaging (P < 0.001). In advanced gastric carcinoma, SRC was more likely to be stage T3‐4 (100%). SRC patients had thicker tumors (P = 0.001) and a higher frequency of diffusely infiltrative gross appearance (P < 0.001). SRC was more likely to have high‐degree contrast enhancement than were NSRC (P = 0.001). The maximal diameter of SRC tumor on MDCT imaging correlated with lymph node metastasis (sensitivity 93.9%, specificity 74.1%) and serosal invasion (sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 78.0%) of SRC. In conclusion, SRC differs significantly from NSRC in clinicopathological features at presentation. MDCT could help differentiate advanced gastric SRC from NSRC based on the thickened stomach wall, high‐degree contrast enhancement, and a higher frequency of diffusely infiltrative gross appearance, particularly in combination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5911613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59116132018-04-30 Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and computed tomography findings between signet ring cell carcinoma and nonsignet ring cell carcinoma in early and advanced gastric cancer Chen, Jian Cai, Rong Ren, Gang Zhao, Jianxi Li, Huali Guo, Chen He, Wenguang Wu, Xiangru Zhang, Wenjie Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) of the stomach is a histological type based on microscopic characteristics. SRC's clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis are still controversial. Our study is to describe the clinicopathological features and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings of patients with SRC of the stomach in comparison with nonsignet ring cell adenocarcinoma (NSRC). We retrospectively analyzed data from 241 patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy, including 62 SRC and 179 NSRC. Clinicopathological outcomes and MDCT findings were evaluated, and we investigated whether these variables were correlated with histopathological type. In early gastric carcinoma, patients with SRC were younger (50.2 vs. 60.2 years; P = 0.000) and more likely to be observed in the middle and lower third stomach (P = 0.010). Early SRC had a tendency to be confined to the mucosa (82.1%). There were significant differences in degree of enhancement between early SRC and NSRC on MDCT imaging (P < 0.001). In advanced gastric carcinoma, SRC was more likely to be stage T3‐4 (100%). SRC patients had thicker tumors (P = 0.001) and a higher frequency of diffusely infiltrative gross appearance (P < 0.001). SRC was more likely to have high‐degree contrast enhancement than were NSRC (P = 0.001). The maximal diameter of SRC tumor on MDCT imaging correlated with lymph node metastasis (sensitivity 93.9%, specificity 74.1%) and serosal invasion (sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 78.0%) of SRC. In conclusion, SRC differs significantly from NSRC in clinicopathological features at presentation. MDCT could help differentiate advanced gastric SRC from NSRC based on the thickened stomach wall, high‐degree contrast enhancement, and a higher frequency of diffusely infiltrative gross appearance, particularly in combination. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5911613/ /pubmed/29533002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1417 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Chen, Jian
Cai, Rong
Ren, Gang
Zhao, Jianxi
Li, Huali
Guo, Chen
He, Wenguang
Wu, Xiangru
Zhang, Wenjie
Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and computed tomography findings between signet ring cell carcinoma and nonsignet ring cell carcinoma in early and advanced gastric cancer
title Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and computed tomography findings between signet ring cell carcinoma and nonsignet ring cell carcinoma in early and advanced gastric cancer
title_full Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and computed tomography findings between signet ring cell carcinoma and nonsignet ring cell carcinoma in early and advanced gastric cancer
title_fullStr Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and computed tomography findings between signet ring cell carcinoma and nonsignet ring cell carcinoma in early and advanced gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and computed tomography findings between signet ring cell carcinoma and nonsignet ring cell carcinoma in early and advanced gastric cancer
title_short Differences in clinicopathological characteristics and computed tomography findings between signet ring cell carcinoma and nonsignet ring cell carcinoma in early and advanced gastric cancer
title_sort differences in clinicopathological characteristics and computed tomography findings between signet ring cell carcinoma and nonsignet ring cell carcinoma in early and advanced gastric cancer
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5911613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29533002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1417
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjian differencesinclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandcomputedtomographyfindingsbetweensignetringcellcarcinomaandnonsignetringcellcarcinomainearlyandadvancedgastriccancer
AT cairong differencesinclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandcomputedtomographyfindingsbetweensignetringcellcarcinomaandnonsignetringcellcarcinomainearlyandadvancedgastriccancer
AT rengang differencesinclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandcomputedtomographyfindingsbetweensignetringcellcarcinomaandnonsignetringcellcarcinomainearlyandadvancedgastriccancer
AT zhaojianxi differencesinclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandcomputedtomographyfindingsbetweensignetringcellcarcinomaandnonsignetringcellcarcinomainearlyandadvancedgastriccancer
AT lihuali differencesinclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandcomputedtomographyfindingsbetweensignetringcellcarcinomaandnonsignetringcellcarcinomainearlyandadvancedgastriccancer
AT guochen differencesinclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandcomputedtomographyfindingsbetweensignetringcellcarcinomaandnonsignetringcellcarcinomainearlyandadvancedgastriccancer
AT hewenguang differencesinclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandcomputedtomographyfindingsbetweensignetringcellcarcinomaandnonsignetringcellcarcinomainearlyandadvancedgastriccancer
AT wuxiangru differencesinclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandcomputedtomographyfindingsbetweensignetringcellcarcinomaandnonsignetringcellcarcinomainearlyandadvancedgastriccancer
AT zhangwenjie differencesinclinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandcomputedtomographyfindingsbetweensignetringcellcarcinomaandnonsignetringcellcarcinomainearlyandadvancedgastriccancer