Cargando…

Have geopolitics influenced decisions on American health foreign assistance efforts during the Obama presidency?

BACKGROUND: This study sought to characterize the possible relationship between US geopolitical priorities and annual decisions on health foreign assistance among recipient nations between 2009 and 2016. METHODS: Data on total planned United States (US) foreign aid and health aid were collected for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Vin, Tsai, Alexander C, Mason-Sharma, Alexandre, Goosby, Eric P, Jha, Ashish K, Kerry, Vanessa B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5912092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29740500
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08.010417
_version_ 1783316335301754880
author Gupta, Vin
Tsai, Alexander C
Mason-Sharma, Alexandre
Goosby, Eric P
Jha, Ashish K
Kerry, Vanessa B
author_facet Gupta, Vin
Tsai, Alexander C
Mason-Sharma, Alexandre
Goosby, Eric P
Jha, Ashish K
Kerry, Vanessa B
author_sort Gupta, Vin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study sought to characterize the possible relationship between US geopolitical priorities and annual decisions on health foreign assistance among recipient nations between 2009 and 2016. METHODS: Data on total planned United States (US) foreign aid and health aid were collected for the 194 member nations of the World Health Organization (WHO) from publicly available databases. Trends in per-capita spending were examined between 2009 and 2016 across the six regions of the WHO (Africa, Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, Southeast Asia, and the Western Pacific). Data on US national security threats were obtained from the Council on Foreign Relations’ annual Preventive Priorities Survey. Multivariable regression models were fitted specifying planned health aid as the dependent variable and threat level of a recipient aid nation as the primary independent variable. RESULTS: Across the aggregate 80 planned recipient countries of US health aid over the duration of the study period, cumulative planned per-capita spending was stable (US$ 0.65 in both 2009 and 2016). The number of annual planned recipients of this aid declined from 74 in 2009 to 56 in 2016 (24.3% decline), with planned allocations decreasing in the Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, and Europe; corresponding increases were observed in Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Western Pacific. Regression analyses demonstrated a dose-response, whereby higher levels of threat were associated with larger declines in planned spending (critical threat nations: b = -3.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.84 to -1.78, P ≤ 0.001) and one-year lagged (critical threat nations: b = -3.91; 95% CI, -5.94 to -1.88, P ≤ 0.001) analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Higher threat levels are associated with less health aid. This is a novel finding, as prior studies have demonstrated a strong association between national security considerations and decisions on development aid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5912092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Edinburgh University Global Health Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59120922018-05-08 Have geopolitics influenced decisions on American health foreign assistance efforts during the Obama presidency? Gupta, Vin Tsai, Alexander C Mason-Sharma, Alexandre Goosby, Eric P Jha, Ashish K Kerry, Vanessa B J Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: This study sought to characterize the possible relationship between US geopolitical priorities and annual decisions on health foreign assistance among recipient nations between 2009 and 2016. METHODS: Data on total planned United States (US) foreign aid and health aid were collected for the 194 member nations of the World Health Organization (WHO) from publicly available databases. Trends in per-capita spending were examined between 2009 and 2016 across the six regions of the WHO (Africa, Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, Southeast Asia, and the Western Pacific). Data on US national security threats were obtained from the Council on Foreign Relations’ annual Preventive Priorities Survey. Multivariable regression models were fitted specifying planned health aid as the dependent variable and threat level of a recipient aid nation as the primary independent variable. RESULTS: Across the aggregate 80 planned recipient countries of US health aid over the duration of the study period, cumulative planned per-capita spending was stable (US$ 0.65 in both 2009 and 2016). The number of annual planned recipients of this aid declined from 74 in 2009 to 56 in 2016 (24.3% decline), with planned allocations decreasing in the Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, and Europe; corresponding increases were observed in Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Western Pacific. Regression analyses demonstrated a dose-response, whereby higher levels of threat were associated with larger declines in planned spending (critical threat nations: b = -3.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.84 to -1.78, P ≤ 0.001) and one-year lagged (critical threat nations: b = -3.91; 95% CI, -5.94 to -1.88, P ≤ 0.001) analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Higher threat levels are associated with less health aid. This is a novel finding, as prior studies have demonstrated a strong association between national security considerations and decisions on development aid. Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2018-06 2018-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5912092/ /pubmed/29740500 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08.010417 Text en Copyright © 2018 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Gupta, Vin
Tsai, Alexander C
Mason-Sharma, Alexandre
Goosby, Eric P
Jha, Ashish K
Kerry, Vanessa B
Have geopolitics influenced decisions on American health foreign assistance efforts during the Obama presidency?
title Have geopolitics influenced decisions on American health foreign assistance efforts during the Obama presidency?
title_full Have geopolitics influenced decisions on American health foreign assistance efforts during the Obama presidency?
title_fullStr Have geopolitics influenced decisions on American health foreign assistance efforts during the Obama presidency?
title_full_unstemmed Have geopolitics influenced decisions on American health foreign assistance efforts during the Obama presidency?
title_short Have geopolitics influenced decisions on American health foreign assistance efforts during the Obama presidency?
title_sort have geopolitics influenced decisions on american health foreign assistance efforts during the obama presidency?
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5912092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29740500
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08.010417
work_keys_str_mv AT guptavin havegeopoliticsinfluenceddecisionsonamericanhealthforeignassistanceeffortsduringtheobamapresidency
AT tsaialexanderc havegeopoliticsinfluenceddecisionsonamericanhealthforeignassistanceeffortsduringtheobamapresidency
AT masonsharmaalexandre havegeopoliticsinfluenceddecisionsonamericanhealthforeignassistanceeffortsduringtheobamapresidency
AT goosbyericp havegeopoliticsinfluenceddecisionsonamericanhealthforeignassistanceeffortsduringtheobamapresidency
AT jhaashishk havegeopoliticsinfluenceddecisionsonamericanhealthforeignassistanceeffortsduringtheobamapresidency
AT kerryvanessab havegeopoliticsinfluenceddecisionsonamericanhealthforeignassistanceeffortsduringtheobamapresidency