Cargando…

Accreditation in India: Pathways and Mechanisms

Continuing medical education (CME) is a valuable mechanism to update physicians’ knowledge with ever-increasing plethora of contemporary advances within medical fraternity. Over time, scope of CME has seen change from simple clinical updates to comprehensive continuing professional development (CPD)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Swaptagni, Shah, Manan, Mane, Amey, Goyal, Vishal, Singh, Vikram, Lele, Jayesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5912189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29755849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2018.1454251
_version_ 1783316346806730752
author Das, Swaptagni
Shah, Manan
Mane, Amey
Goyal, Vishal
Singh, Vikram
Lele, Jayesh
author_facet Das, Swaptagni
Shah, Manan
Mane, Amey
Goyal, Vishal
Singh, Vikram
Lele, Jayesh
author_sort Das, Swaptagni
collection PubMed
description Continuing medical education (CME) is a valuable mechanism to update physicians’ knowledge with ever-increasing plethora of contemporary advances within medical fraternity. Over time, scope of CME has seen change from simple clinical updates to comprehensive continuing professional development (CPD), which is accomplished with help of accredited CME programmes. The Medical Council of India, in 2011, made a mandatory resolution for doctors to attend minimum of 30 hours of CME/5 years to ensure recertification. Authorised accreditation councils and licensing authorities award CME credits for maintenance of physicians’ licensures. To date, in India, only 9 of 26 State Medical Councils have made re-registration mandatory. Although CME events benefit healthcare professionals by improving their proficiency and awareness, costs even to attend such interventions may be prohibitive. Despite financial help being received through grants and sponsorships, ethics of industry-sponsored CME remains a matter of debate. However, over past 10 years, pharmaceutical companies have started going beyond basic product information in order to focus on building physicians’ knowledge in various therapeutic areas. Though CME credit system and criteria for re-licensure for medical practice in India are evolving at a rapid pace, there is a need for harmonisation and robust implementation across all states in India.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5912189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59121892018-05-11 Accreditation in India: Pathways and Mechanisms Das, Swaptagni Shah, Manan Mane, Amey Goyal, Vishal Singh, Vikram Lele, Jayesh J Eur CME Research Article Continuing medical education (CME) is a valuable mechanism to update physicians’ knowledge with ever-increasing plethora of contemporary advances within medical fraternity. Over time, scope of CME has seen change from simple clinical updates to comprehensive continuing professional development (CPD), which is accomplished with help of accredited CME programmes. The Medical Council of India, in 2011, made a mandatory resolution for doctors to attend minimum of 30 hours of CME/5 years to ensure recertification. Authorised accreditation councils and licensing authorities award CME credits for maintenance of physicians’ licensures. To date, in India, only 9 of 26 State Medical Councils have made re-registration mandatory. Although CME events benefit healthcare professionals by improving their proficiency and awareness, costs even to attend such interventions may be prohibitive. Despite financial help being received through grants and sponsorships, ethics of industry-sponsored CME remains a matter of debate. However, over past 10 years, pharmaceutical companies have started going beyond basic product information in order to focus on building physicians’ knowledge in various therapeutic areas. Though CME credit system and criteria for re-licensure for medical practice in India are evolving at a rapid pace, there is a need for harmonisation and robust implementation across all states in India. Taylor & Francis 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5912189/ /pubmed/29755849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2018.1454251 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Das, Swaptagni
Shah, Manan
Mane, Amey
Goyal, Vishal
Singh, Vikram
Lele, Jayesh
Accreditation in India: Pathways and Mechanisms
title Accreditation in India: Pathways and Mechanisms
title_full Accreditation in India: Pathways and Mechanisms
title_fullStr Accreditation in India: Pathways and Mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Accreditation in India: Pathways and Mechanisms
title_short Accreditation in India: Pathways and Mechanisms
title_sort accreditation in india: pathways and mechanisms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5912189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29755849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2018.1454251
work_keys_str_mv AT dasswaptagni accreditationinindiapathwaysandmechanisms
AT shahmanan accreditationinindiapathwaysandmechanisms
AT maneamey accreditationinindiapathwaysandmechanisms
AT goyalvishal accreditationinindiapathwaysandmechanisms
AT singhvikram accreditationinindiapathwaysandmechanisms
AT lelejayesh accreditationinindiapathwaysandmechanisms