Cargando…

Development of a quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the field detection of Erysiphe necator

Plant pathogen detection systems have been useful tools to monitor inoculum presence and initiate management schedules. More recently, a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay was successfully designed for field use in the grape powdery mildew pathosystem; however, false negatives or fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thiessen, Lindsey D., Neill, Tara M., Mahaffee, Walter F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5912203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29692952
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4639
_version_ 1783316350195728384
author Thiessen, Lindsey D.
Neill, Tara M.
Mahaffee, Walter F.
author_facet Thiessen, Lindsey D.
Neill, Tara M.
Mahaffee, Walter F.
author_sort Thiessen, Lindsey D.
collection PubMed
description Plant pathogen detection systems have been useful tools to monitor inoculum presence and initiate management schedules. More recently, a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay was successfully designed for field use in the grape powdery mildew pathosystem; however, false negatives or false positives were prevalent in grower-conducted assays due to the difficulty in perceiving the magnesium pyrophosphate precipitate at low DNA concentrations. A quantitative LAMP (qLAMP) assay using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based probe was assessed by grape growers in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Custom impaction spore samplers were placed at a research vineyard and six commercial vineyard locations, and were tested bi-weekly by the lab and by growers. Grower-conducted qLAMP assays used a beta-version of the Smart-DART handheld LAMP reaction devices (Diagenetix, Inc., Honolulu, HI, USA), connected to Android 4.4 enabled, Bluetooth-capable Nexus 7 tablets for output. Quantification by a quantitative PCR assay was assumed correct to compare the lab and grower qLAMP assay quantification. Growers were able to conduct and interpret qLAMP results; however, the Erysiphe necator inoculum quantification was unreliable using the beta-Smart-DART devices. The qLAMP assay developed was sensitive to one spore in early testing of the assay, but decreased to >20 spores by the end of the trial. The qLAMP assay is not likely a suitable management tool for grape powdery mildew due to losses in sensitivity and decreasing costs and portability for other, more reliable molecular tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5912203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59122032018-04-24 Development of a quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the field detection of Erysiphe necator Thiessen, Lindsey D. Neill, Tara M. Mahaffee, Walter F. PeerJ Agricultural Science Plant pathogen detection systems have been useful tools to monitor inoculum presence and initiate management schedules. More recently, a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay was successfully designed for field use in the grape powdery mildew pathosystem; however, false negatives or false positives were prevalent in grower-conducted assays due to the difficulty in perceiving the magnesium pyrophosphate precipitate at low DNA concentrations. A quantitative LAMP (qLAMP) assay using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based probe was assessed by grape growers in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Custom impaction spore samplers were placed at a research vineyard and six commercial vineyard locations, and were tested bi-weekly by the lab and by growers. Grower-conducted qLAMP assays used a beta-version of the Smart-DART handheld LAMP reaction devices (Diagenetix, Inc., Honolulu, HI, USA), connected to Android 4.4 enabled, Bluetooth-capable Nexus 7 tablets for output. Quantification by a quantitative PCR assay was assumed correct to compare the lab and grower qLAMP assay quantification. Growers were able to conduct and interpret qLAMP results; however, the Erysiphe necator inoculum quantification was unreliable using the beta-Smart-DART devices. The qLAMP assay developed was sensitive to one spore in early testing of the assay, but decreased to >20 spores by the end of the trial. The qLAMP assay is not likely a suitable management tool for grape powdery mildew due to losses in sensitivity and decreasing costs and portability for other, more reliable molecular tools. PeerJ Inc. 2018-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5912203/ /pubmed/29692952 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4639 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, made available under the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) . This work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Thiessen, Lindsey D.
Neill, Tara M.
Mahaffee, Walter F.
Development of a quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the field detection of Erysiphe necator
title Development of a quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the field detection of Erysiphe necator
title_full Development of a quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the field detection of Erysiphe necator
title_fullStr Development of a quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the field detection of Erysiphe necator
title_full_unstemmed Development of a quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the field detection of Erysiphe necator
title_short Development of a quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the field detection of Erysiphe necator
title_sort development of a quantitative loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the field detection of erysiphe necator
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5912203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29692952
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4639
work_keys_str_mv AT thiessenlindseyd developmentofaquantitativeloopmediatedisothermalamplificationassayforthefielddetectionoferysiphenecator
AT neilltaram developmentofaquantitativeloopmediatedisothermalamplificationassayforthefielddetectionoferysiphenecator
AT mahaffeewalterf developmentofaquantitativeloopmediatedisothermalamplificationassayforthefielddetectionoferysiphenecator