Cargando…

Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?

Background: Soldiers’ perception of leadership during military deployment has gained research attention as a potentially modifiable factor to buffer against the development of postdeployment post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Within nonmilitary research, the organizational justice (OJ) framework...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elrond, Andreas F., Høgh, Annie, Andersen, Søren B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5912440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2018.1449558
_version_ 1783316376142741504
author Elrond, Andreas F.
Høgh, Annie
Andersen, Søren B.
author_facet Elrond, Andreas F.
Høgh, Annie
Andersen, Søren B.
author_sort Elrond, Andreas F.
collection PubMed
description Background: Soldiers’ perception of leadership during military deployment has gained research attention as a potentially modifiable factor to buffer against the development of postdeployment post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Within nonmilitary research, the organizational justice (OJ) framework, i.e. distributive justice, procedural justice (PJ) and interactional justice (IJ), has been found to relate to mental health outcomes. Aspects of OJ may, therefore, be protective against PTSD. Objectives: We examined the prospective relationship between aspects of OJ, namely the perceptions of PJ and IJ by subordinate soldiers without leadership obligations in relationship to immediate superiors and PTSD. Method: Participants were soldiers (n = 245) deployed to Helmand Province in Afghanistan in 2009. Logistic regression procedures were used. The primary analysis measured PTSD cases using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis-I Disorder (SCID) 2½ years after homecoming. PJ/IJ was measured during deployment with a 6-item composite measure ranging from 0 to 12. Supplementary primary analyses were performed with PJ/IJ measured before and immediately after deployment. A secondary PJ/IJ analysis also tested against four postdeployment measures with the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Civilian (PCL-C) dichotomized at screening symptom levels. Results: Higher levels of perceived PJ/IJ for soldiers without leadership obligations during deployment had a prospective relation (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75–0.98) with PTSD on the SCID 2½ years after homecoming after adjustment for factors including predeployment PTSD symptoms, trauma and combat exposure, and state affectivity. Similar results were found by measuring PJ/IJ before (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.71–0.95) but not immediately after homecoming (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85–1.11). A relationship with PTSD symptoms at the screening level at the four measurements of PCL-C was found, but only when predeployment PTSD symptoms were not controlled for. Conclusions: These results suggest that PJ/IJ exercised by superiors in relation to military deployments may protect subordinate soldiers against the development of postdeployment PTSD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5912440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59124402018-04-27 Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective? Elrond, Andreas F. Høgh, Annie Andersen, Søren B. Eur J Psychotraumatol Basic Research Article Background: Soldiers’ perception of leadership during military deployment has gained research attention as a potentially modifiable factor to buffer against the development of postdeployment post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Within nonmilitary research, the organizational justice (OJ) framework, i.e. distributive justice, procedural justice (PJ) and interactional justice (IJ), has been found to relate to mental health outcomes. Aspects of OJ may, therefore, be protective against PTSD. Objectives: We examined the prospective relationship between aspects of OJ, namely the perceptions of PJ and IJ by subordinate soldiers without leadership obligations in relationship to immediate superiors and PTSD. Method: Participants were soldiers (n = 245) deployed to Helmand Province in Afghanistan in 2009. Logistic regression procedures were used. The primary analysis measured PTSD cases using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis-I Disorder (SCID) 2½ years after homecoming. PJ/IJ was measured during deployment with a 6-item composite measure ranging from 0 to 12. Supplementary primary analyses were performed with PJ/IJ measured before and immediately after deployment. A secondary PJ/IJ analysis also tested against four postdeployment measures with the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Civilian (PCL-C) dichotomized at screening symptom levels. Results: Higher levels of perceived PJ/IJ for soldiers without leadership obligations during deployment had a prospective relation (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75–0.98) with PTSD on the SCID 2½ years after homecoming after adjustment for factors including predeployment PTSD symptoms, trauma and combat exposure, and state affectivity. Similar results were found by measuring PJ/IJ before (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.71–0.95) but not immediately after homecoming (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.85–1.11). A relationship with PTSD symptoms at the screening level at the four measurements of PCL-C was found, but only when predeployment PTSD symptoms were not controlled for. Conclusions: These results suggest that PJ/IJ exercised by superiors in relation to military deployments may protect subordinate soldiers against the development of postdeployment PTSD. Taylor & Francis 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5912440/ /pubmed/29707168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2018.1449558 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Basic Research Article
Elrond, Andreas F.
Høgh, Annie
Andersen, Søren B.
Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
title Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
title_full Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
title_fullStr Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
title_full_unstemmed Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
title_short Leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
title_sort leadership and post-traumatic stress disorder: are soldiers’ perceptions of organizational justice during deployment protective?
topic Basic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5912440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2018.1449558
work_keys_str_mv AT elrondandreasf leadershipandposttraumaticstressdisorderaresoldiersperceptionsoforganizationaljusticeduringdeploymentprotective
AT høghannie leadershipandposttraumaticstressdisorderaresoldiersperceptionsoforganizationaljusticeduringdeploymentprotective
AT andersensørenb leadershipandposttraumaticstressdisorderaresoldiersperceptionsoforganizationaljusticeduringdeploymentprotective