Cargando…

Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy: Surgical Approaches and Postoperative Imaging Changes

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. PURPOSE: This study investigated the relationship between surgical approaches and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD), including the reduction in intervertebral disc height and the incidence of Modic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Shu, Taguchi, Mitsuto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5913021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713411
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.294
_version_ 1783316453655576576
author Nakamura, Shu
Taguchi, Mitsuto
author_facet Nakamura, Shu
Taguchi, Mitsuto
author_sort Nakamura, Shu
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. PURPOSE: This study investigated the relationship between surgical approaches and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD), including the reduction in intervertebral disc height and the incidence of Modic changes. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The anterior approach involves partial invasion of the intervertebral disc, with a reported reduction in intervertebral disc height after PECD. METHODS: Forty-two patients with cervical disk hernia who underwent PECD and magnetic resonance imaging at least 3 months postoperatively were divided into four groups according to the hernia sites and the surgical approach used: unilateral hernia treated using the contralateral approach (group C, n=18), unilateral hernia treated using the ipsilateral approach (group I, n=15), midline hernia (group M, n=4), and broad and bilateral hernia (group B, n=5). Modic changes and intervertebral disc height were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall incidence of Modic changes was 52.4%: 72.2% in group C, 26.7% in group I, 25.0% in group M, and 80.0% in group B. The reduction in intervertebral disc height was 21.8% across all the patients: 24.5% in group C, 11.0% in group I, 22.8% in group M, and 23.9% in group B. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of Modic changes and the reduction in intervertebral disc height were lower in the patients treated using the ipsilateral approach than in those treated using the contralateral approach. Traditionally, a contralateral approach has been used for PECD; however, the ipsilateral approach is more appropriate and is therefore recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5913021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59130212018-04-30 Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy: Surgical Approaches and Postoperative Imaging Changes Nakamura, Shu Taguchi, Mitsuto Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. PURPOSE: This study investigated the relationship between surgical approaches and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD), including the reduction in intervertebral disc height and the incidence of Modic changes. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The anterior approach involves partial invasion of the intervertebral disc, with a reported reduction in intervertebral disc height after PECD. METHODS: Forty-two patients with cervical disk hernia who underwent PECD and magnetic resonance imaging at least 3 months postoperatively were divided into four groups according to the hernia sites and the surgical approach used: unilateral hernia treated using the contralateral approach (group C, n=18), unilateral hernia treated using the ipsilateral approach (group I, n=15), midline hernia (group M, n=4), and broad and bilateral hernia (group B, n=5). Modic changes and intervertebral disc height were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall incidence of Modic changes was 52.4%: 72.2% in group C, 26.7% in group I, 25.0% in group M, and 80.0% in group B. The reduction in intervertebral disc height was 21.8% across all the patients: 24.5% in group C, 11.0% in group I, 22.8% in group M, and 23.9% in group B. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of Modic changes and the reduction in intervertebral disc height were lower in the patients treated using the ipsilateral approach than in those treated using the contralateral approach. Traditionally, a contralateral approach has been used for PECD; however, the ipsilateral approach is more appropriate and is therefore recommended. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2018-04 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5913021/ /pubmed/29713411 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.294 Text en Copyright © 2018 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Nakamura, Shu
Taguchi, Mitsuto
Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy: Surgical Approaches and Postoperative Imaging Changes
title Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy: Surgical Approaches and Postoperative Imaging Changes
title_full Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy: Surgical Approaches and Postoperative Imaging Changes
title_fullStr Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy: Surgical Approaches and Postoperative Imaging Changes
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy: Surgical Approaches and Postoperative Imaging Changes
title_short Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy: Surgical Approaches and Postoperative Imaging Changes
title_sort percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: surgical approaches and postoperative imaging changes
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5913021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713411
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.2.294
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamurashu percutaneousendoscopiccervicaldiscectomysurgicalapproachesandpostoperativeimagingchanges
AT taguchimitsuto percutaneousendoscopiccervicaldiscectomysurgicalapproachesandpostoperativeimagingchanges