Cargando…
Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women
BACKGROUND: The use of valid dietary assessment methods is crucial to analyse adherence to dietary recommendations among pregnant women. This study aims to assess the relative validity of a self-administered Web-based 24-h dietary recall, the R24W, against a pen-paper 3-day food record (FR) among pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5913813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29685127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1741-1 |
_version_ | 1783316609834680320 |
---|---|
author | Savard, Claudia Lemieux, Simone Lafrenière, Jacynthe Laramée, Catherine Robitaille, Julie Morisset, Anne-Sophie |
author_facet | Savard, Claudia Lemieux, Simone Lafrenière, Jacynthe Laramée, Catherine Robitaille, Julie Morisset, Anne-Sophie |
author_sort | Savard, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of valid dietary assessment methods is crucial to analyse adherence to dietary recommendations among pregnant women. This study aims to assess the relative validity of a self-administered Web-based 24-h dietary recall, the R24W, against a pen-paper 3-day food record (FR) among pregnant women. METHODS: Sixty (60) pregnant women recruited at 9.3 ± 0.7 weeks of pregnancy in Quebec City completed, at each trimester, 3 R24W and a 3-day FR. Mean energy and nutrient intakes reported by both tools were compared using paired Student T-Tests. Pearson correlations were used to analyze the association between both methods. Agreement between the two methods was evaluated using cross-classification analyses, weighted kappa coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients were all significant, except for vitamin B(12) (r = 0.03; p = 0.83) and ranged from 0.27 to 0.76 (p < 0.05). Differences between mean intakes assessed by the R24W and the FR did not exceed 10% in 19 variables and were not significant for 16 out of 26 variables. In cross-classification analyses, the R24W ranked, on average, 79.1% of participants in the same or adjacent quartiles as the FR. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a 3-day FR, the R24W is a valid method to assess intakes of energy and most nutrients but may be less accurate in the evaluation of intakes of fat (as a proportion of energy intake), vitamin D, zinc and folic acid. During pregnancy, the R24W was a more accurate tool at a group-level than at an individual-level and should, therefore, be used in an epidemiological rather than a clinical setting. The R24W may be particularly valuable as a tool used in cohort studies to provide valid information on pregnant women’s dietary intakes and facilitate evaluation of associations between diet and adverse pregnancy outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1741-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5913813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59138132018-04-30 Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women Savard, Claudia Lemieux, Simone Lafrenière, Jacynthe Laramée, Catherine Robitaille, Julie Morisset, Anne-Sophie BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of valid dietary assessment methods is crucial to analyse adherence to dietary recommendations among pregnant women. This study aims to assess the relative validity of a self-administered Web-based 24-h dietary recall, the R24W, against a pen-paper 3-day food record (FR) among pregnant women. METHODS: Sixty (60) pregnant women recruited at 9.3 ± 0.7 weeks of pregnancy in Quebec City completed, at each trimester, 3 R24W and a 3-day FR. Mean energy and nutrient intakes reported by both tools were compared using paired Student T-Tests. Pearson correlations were used to analyze the association between both methods. Agreement between the two methods was evaluated using cross-classification analyses, weighted kappa coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients were all significant, except for vitamin B(12) (r = 0.03; p = 0.83) and ranged from 0.27 to 0.76 (p < 0.05). Differences between mean intakes assessed by the R24W and the FR did not exceed 10% in 19 variables and were not significant for 16 out of 26 variables. In cross-classification analyses, the R24W ranked, on average, 79.1% of participants in the same or adjacent quartiles as the FR. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a 3-day FR, the R24W is a valid method to assess intakes of energy and most nutrients but may be less accurate in the evaluation of intakes of fat (as a proportion of energy intake), vitamin D, zinc and folic acid. During pregnancy, the R24W was a more accurate tool at a group-level than at an individual-level and should, therefore, be used in an epidemiological rather than a clinical setting. The R24W may be particularly valuable as a tool used in cohort studies to provide valid information on pregnant women’s dietary intakes and facilitate evaluation of associations between diet and adverse pregnancy outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1741-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5913813/ /pubmed/29685127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1741-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Savard, Claudia Lemieux, Simone Lafrenière, Jacynthe Laramée, Catherine Robitaille, Julie Morisset, Anne-Sophie Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women |
title | Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women |
title_full | Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women |
title_fullStr | Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women |
title_short | Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women |
title_sort | validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5913813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29685127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1741-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT savardclaudia validationofaselfadministeredwebbased24hourdietaryrecallamongpregnantwomen AT lemieuxsimone validationofaselfadministeredwebbased24hourdietaryrecallamongpregnantwomen AT lafrenierejacynthe validationofaselfadministeredwebbased24hourdietaryrecallamongpregnantwomen AT larameecatherine validationofaselfadministeredwebbased24hourdietaryrecallamongpregnantwomen AT robitaillejulie validationofaselfadministeredwebbased24hourdietaryrecallamongpregnantwomen AT morissetannesophie validationofaselfadministeredwebbased24hourdietaryrecallamongpregnantwomen |