Cargando…

Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women

BACKGROUND: The use of valid dietary assessment methods is crucial to analyse adherence to dietary recommendations among pregnant women. This study aims to assess the relative validity of a self-administered Web-based 24-h dietary recall, the R24W, against a pen-paper 3-day food record (FR) among pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savard, Claudia, Lemieux, Simone, Lafrenière, Jacynthe, Laramée, Catherine, Robitaille, Julie, Morisset, Anne-Sophie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5913813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29685127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1741-1
_version_ 1783316609834680320
author Savard, Claudia
Lemieux, Simone
Lafrenière, Jacynthe
Laramée, Catherine
Robitaille, Julie
Morisset, Anne-Sophie
author_facet Savard, Claudia
Lemieux, Simone
Lafrenière, Jacynthe
Laramée, Catherine
Robitaille, Julie
Morisset, Anne-Sophie
author_sort Savard, Claudia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of valid dietary assessment methods is crucial to analyse adherence to dietary recommendations among pregnant women. This study aims to assess the relative validity of a self-administered Web-based 24-h dietary recall, the R24W, against a pen-paper 3-day food record (FR) among pregnant women. METHODS: Sixty (60) pregnant women recruited at 9.3 ± 0.7 weeks of pregnancy in Quebec City completed, at each trimester, 3 R24W and a 3-day FR. Mean energy and nutrient intakes reported by both tools were compared using paired Student T-Tests. Pearson correlations were used to analyze the association between both methods. Agreement between the two methods was evaluated using cross-classification analyses, weighted kappa coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients were all significant, except for vitamin B(12) (r = 0.03; p = 0.83) and ranged from 0.27 to 0.76 (p < 0.05). Differences between mean intakes assessed by the R24W and the FR did not exceed 10% in 19 variables and were not significant for 16 out of 26 variables. In cross-classification analyses, the R24W ranked, on average, 79.1% of participants in the same or adjacent quartiles as the FR. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a 3-day FR, the R24W is a valid method to assess intakes of energy and most nutrients but may be less accurate in the evaluation of intakes of fat (as a proportion of energy intake), vitamin D, zinc and folic acid. During pregnancy, the R24W was a more accurate tool at a group-level than at an individual-level and should, therefore, be used in an epidemiological rather than a clinical setting. The R24W may be particularly valuable as a tool used in cohort studies to provide valid information on pregnant women’s dietary intakes and facilitate evaluation of associations between diet and adverse pregnancy outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1741-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5913813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59138132018-04-30 Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women Savard, Claudia Lemieux, Simone Lafrenière, Jacynthe Laramée, Catherine Robitaille, Julie Morisset, Anne-Sophie BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of valid dietary assessment methods is crucial to analyse adherence to dietary recommendations among pregnant women. This study aims to assess the relative validity of a self-administered Web-based 24-h dietary recall, the R24W, against a pen-paper 3-day food record (FR) among pregnant women. METHODS: Sixty (60) pregnant women recruited at 9.3 ± 0.7 weeks of pregnancy in Quebec City completed, at each trimester, 3 R24W and a 3-day FR. Mean energy and nutrient intakes reported by both tools were compared using paired Student T-Tests. Pearson correlations were used to analyze the association between both methods. Agreement between the two methods was evaluated using cross-classification analyses, weighted kappa coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients were all significant, except for vitamin B(12) (r = 0.03; p = 0.83) and ranged from 0.27 to 0.76 (p < 0.05). Differences between mean intakes assessed by the R24W and the FR did not exceed 10% in 19 variables and were not significant for 16 out of 26 variables. In cross-classification analyses, the R24W ranked, on average, 79.1% of participants in the same or adjacent quartiles as the FR. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a 3-day FR, the R24W is a valid method to assess intakes of energy and most nutrients but may be less accurate in the evaluation of intakes of fat (as a proportion of energy intake), vitamin D, zinc and folic acid. During pregnancy, the R24W was a more accurate tool at a group-level than at an individual-level and should, therefore, be used in an epidemiological rather than a clinical setting. The R24W may be particularly valuable as a tool used in cohort studies to provide valid information on pregnant women’s dietary intakes and facilitate evaluation of associations between diet and adverse pregnancy outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1741-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5913813/ /pubmed/29685127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1741-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Savard, Claudia
Lemieux, Simone
Lafrenière, Jacynthe
Laramée, Catherine
Robitaille, Julie
Morisset, Anne-Sophie
Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women
title Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women
title_full Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women
title_fullStr Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women
title_short Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women
title_sort validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5913813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29685127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1741-1
work_keys_str_mv AT savardclaudia validationofaselfadministeredwebbased24hourdietaryrecallamongpregnantwomen
AT lemieuxsimone validationofaselfadministeredwebbased24hourdietaryrecallamongpregnantwomen
AT lafrenierejacynthe validationofaselfadministeredwebbased24hourdietaryrecallamongpregnantwomen
AT larameecatherine validationofaselfadministeredwebbased24hourdietaryrecallamongpregnantwomen
AT robitaillejulie validationofaselfadministeredwebbased24hourdietaryrecallamongpregnantwomen
AT morissetannesophie validationofaselfadministeredwebbased24hourdietaryrecallamongpregnantwomen