Cargando…

Altruism, Scepticism, and collective decision-making in foreign-born U.S. residents in a tuberculosis vaccine trial

BACKGROUND: The current vaccine against tuberculosis, BCG, is effective when given in most TB-endemic countries at birth but has diminished efficacy against pulmonary TB after 15–20 years. As a result, new booster vaccines for adolescents and adults are being developed to realize the World Health Or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Craig, Sienna R., Lahey, Timothy, Dixit, Apoorva, Fordham von Reyn, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29685114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5460-3
_version_ 1783316635009941504
author Craig, Sienna R.
Lahey, Timothy
Dixit, Apoorva
Fordham von Reyn, C.
author_facet Craig, Sienna R.
Lahey, Timothy
Dixit, Apoorva
Fordham von Reyn, C.
author_sort Craig, Sienna R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current vaccine against tuberculosis, BCG, is effective when given in most TB-endemic countries at birth but has diminished efficacy against pulmonary TB after 15–20 years. As a result, new booster vaccines for adolescents and adults are being developed to realize the World Health Organization target of global elimination of TB by 2035. Multiple TB candidates thus are in active clinical development. METHODS: One of these, DAR-901, is advancing in human clinical trials. These clinical trials are conducted in BCG immunized adults with and without HIV infection in order to assess safety and efficacy among the people most in need of a new vaccine. A Phase I dose escalation trial of DAR-901 in BCG-immunized adults with or without HIV infection was conducted between 2014 and 2016. This offered an unusual opportunity to qualitatively examine why foreign-born adults living in the United States – a poorly studied population – decide to participate, or not, in clinical trials. RESULTS: We conducted a qualitative study of individuals who were recruited to participate in this Phase I vaccine trial, interviewing those who agreed and declined to participate. We found diverse motivations for participation or refusal; varied understandings of tuberculosis and vaccines; and complex views about how ‘informed consent’ can be at odds with cultural understandings of power, authority, and medical decision-making. These dynamics included: knowledge (direct or indirect) of tuberculosis, a desire to be altruistic and simultaneous hopes for personal gain as well as concerns over what remuneration for participation could mean, the importance of personal relationships with care providers in shaping volunteerism, concerns over privacy, and evidence of how culture and history shape medical decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: This US-based trial, aimed at addressing a crucible global health issue, raises productive questions about the interface between altruism and scepticism regarding clinical research participation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02063555.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5914029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59140292018-04-30 Altruism, Scepticism, and collective decision-making in foreign-born U.S. residents in a tuberculosis vaccine trial Craig, Sienna R. Lahey, Timothy Dixit, Apoorva Fordham von Reyn, C. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The current vaccine against tuberculosis, BCG, is effective when given in most TB-endemic countries at birth but has diminished efficacy against pulmonary TB after 15–20 years. As a result, new booster vaccines for adolescents and adults are being developed to realize the World Health Organization target of global elimination of TB by 2035. Multiple TB candidates thus are in active clinical development. METHODS: One of these, DAR-901, is advancing in human clinical trials. These clinical trials are conducted in BCG immunized adults with and without HIV infection in order to assess safety and efficacy among the people most in need of a new vaccine. A Phase I dose escalation trial of DAR-901 in BCG-immunized adults with or without HIV infection was conducted between 2014 and 2016. This offered an unusual opportunity to qualitatively examine why foreign-born adults living in the United States – a poorly studied population – decide to participate, or not, in clinical trials. RESULTS: We conducted a qualitative study of individuals who were recruited to participate in this Phase I vaccine trial, interviewing those who agreed and declined to participate. We found diverse motivations for participation or refusal; varied understandings of tuberculosis and vaccines; and complex views about how ‘informed consent’ can be at odds with cultural understandings of power, authority, and medical decision-making. These dynamics included: knowledge (direct or indirect) of tuberculosis, a desire to be altruistic and simultaneous hopes for personal gain as well as concerns over what remuneration for participation could mean, the importance of personal relationships with care providers in shaping volunteerism, concerns over privacy, and evidence of how culture and history shape medical decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: This US-based trial, aimed at addressing a crucible global health issue, raises productive questions about the interface between altruism and scepticism regarding clinical research participation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02063555. BioMed Central 2018-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5914029/ /pubmed/29685114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5460-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Craig, Sienna R.
Lahey, Timothy
Dixit, Apoorva
Fordham von Reyn, C.
Altruism, Scepticism, and collective decision-making in foreign-born U.S. residents in a tuberculosis vaccine trial
title Altruism, Scepticism, and collective decision-making in foreign-born U.S. residents in a tuberculosis vaccine trial
title_full Altruism, Scepticism, and collective decision-making in foreign-born U.S. residents in a tuberculosis vaccine trial
title_fullStr Altruism, Scepticism, and collective decision-making in foreign-born U.S. residents in a tuberculosis vaccine trial
title_full_unstemmed Altruism, Scepticism, and collective decision-making in foreign-born U.S. residents in a tuberculosis vaccine trial
title_short Altruism, Scepticism, and collective decision-making in foreign-born U.S. residents in a tuberculosis vaccine trial
title_sort altruism, scepticism, and collective decision-making in foreign-born u.s. residents in a tuberculosis vaccine trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29685114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5460-3
work_keys_str_mv AT craigsiennar altruismscepticismandcollectivedecisionmakinginforeignbornusresidentsinatuberculosisvaccinetrial
AT laheytimothy altruismscepticismandcollectivedecisionmakinginforeignbornusresidentsinatuberculosisvaccinetrial
AT dixitapoorva altruismscepticismandcollectivedecisionmakinginforeignbornusresidentsinatuberculosisvaccinetrial
AT fordhamvonreync altruismscepticismandcollectivedecisionmakinginforeignbornusresidentsinatuberculosisvaccinetrial