Cargando…

Haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings

BACKGROUND: Recommendations for haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings are largely lacking. METHODS: A task force of six international experts in critical care medicine, all of them members of the Global Intensive Care Working Group of the Europea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Misango, David, Pattnaik, Rajyabardhan, Baker, Tim, Dünser, Martin W, Dondorp, Arjen M, Schultz, Marcus J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29438568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/try007
_version_ 1783316704243220480
author Misango, David
Pattnaik, Rajyabardhan
Baker, Tim
Dünser, Martin W
Dondorp, Arjen M
Schultz, Marcus J
author_facet Misango, David
Pattnaik, Rajyabardhan
Baker, Tim
Dünser, Martin W
Dondorp, Arjen M
Schultz, Marcus J
author_sort Misango, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recommendations for haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings are largely lacking. METHODS: A task force of six international experts in critical care medicine, all of them members of the Global Intensive Care Working Group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and with extensive bedside experience in resource-limited intensive care units, reviewed the literature and provided recommendations regarding haemodynamic assessment and support, keeping aspects of efficacy and effectiveness, availability and feasibility and affordability and safety in mind. RESULTS: We suggest using capillary refill time, skin mottling scores and skin temperature gradients; suggest a passive leg raise test to guide fluid resuscitation; recommend crystalloid solutions as the initial fluid of choice; recommend initial fluid resuscitation with 30 ml/kg in the first 3 h, but with extreme caution in settings where there is a lack of mechanical ventilation; recommend against an early start of vasopressors; suggest starting a vasopressor in patients with persistent hypotension after initial fluid resuscitation with at least 30 ml/kg, but earlier when there is lack of vasopressors and mechanical ventilation; recommend using norepinephrine (noradrenaline) as a first-line vasopressor; suggest starting an inotrope with persistence of plasma lactate >2 mmol/L or persistence of skin mottling or prolonged capillary refill time when plasma lactate cannot be measured, and only after initial fluid resuscitation; suggest the use of dobutamine as a first-line inotrope; recommend administering vasopressors through a central venous line and suggest administering vasopressors and inotropes via a central venous line using a syringe or infusion pump when available. CONCLUSION: Recommendations for haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings have been developed by a task force of six international experts in critical care medicine with extensive practical experience in resource-limited settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5914406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59144062018-05-04 Haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings Misango, David Pattnaik, Rajyabardhan Baker, Tim Dünser, Martin W Dondorp, Arjen M Schultz, Marcus J Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Review BACKGROUND: Recommendations for haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings are largely lacking. METHODS: A task force of six international experts in critical care medicine, all of them members of the Global Intensive Care Working Group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and with extensive bedside experience in resource-limited intensive care units, reviewed the literature and provided recommendations regarding haemodynamic assessment and support, keeping aspects of efficacy and effectiveness, availability and feasibility and affordability and safety in mind. RESULTS: We suggest using capillary refill time, skin mottling scores and skin temperature gradients; suggest a passive leg raise test to guide fluid resuscitation; recommend crystalloid solutions as the initial fluid of choice; recommend initial fluid resuscitation with 30 ml/kg in the first 3 h, but with extreme caution in settings where there is a lack of mechanical ventilation; recommend against an early start of vasopressors; suggest starting a vasopressor in patients with persistent hypotension after initial fluid resuscitation with at least 30 ml/kg, but earlier when there is lack of vasopressors and mechanical ventilation; recommend using norepinephrine (noradrenaline) as a first-line vasopressor; suggest starting an inotrope with persistence of plasma lactate >2 mmol/L or persistence of skin mottling or prolonged capillary refill time when plasma lactate cannot be measured, and only after initial fluid resuscitation; suggest the use of dobutamine as a first-line inotrope; recommend administering vasopressors through a central venous line and suggest administering vasopressors and inotropes via a central venous line using a syringe or infusion pump when available. CONCLUSION: Recommendations for haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings have been developed by a task force of six international experts in critical care medicine with extensive practical experience in resource-limited settings. Oxford University Press 2017-11 2018-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5914406/ /pubmed/29438568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/try007 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Misango, David
Pattnaik, Rajyabardhan
Baker, Tim
Dünser, Martin W
Dondorp, Arjen M
Schultz, Marcus J
Haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings
title Haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings
title_full Haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings
title_fullStr Haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings
title_full_unstemmed Haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings
title_short Haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings
title_sort haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29438568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/try007
work_keys_str_mv AT misangodavid haemodynamicassessmentandsupportinsepsisandsepticshockinresourcelimitedsettings
AT pattnaikrajyabardhan haemodynamicassessmentandsupportinsepsisandsepticshockinresourcelimitedsettings
AT bakertim haemodynamicassessmentandsupportinsepsisandsepticshockinresourcelimitedsettings
AT dunsermartinw haemodynamicassessmentandsupportinsepsisandsepticshockinresourcelimitedsettings
AT dondorparjenm haemodynamicassessmentandsupportinsepsisandsepticshockinresourcelimitedsettings
AT schultzmarcusj haemodynamicassessmentandsupportinsepsisandsepticshockinresourcelimitedsettings
AT haemodynamicassessmentandsupportinsepsisandsepticshockinresourcelimitedsettings
AT haemodynamicassessmentandsupportinsepsisandsepticshockinresourcelimitedsettings