Cargando…
Feasibility of personalised remote long-term follow-up of people with cochlear implants: a randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Substantial resources are required to provide lifelong postoperative care to people with cochlear implants. Most patients visit the clinic annually. We introduced a person-centred remote follow-up pathway, giving patients telemedicine tools to use at home so they would only visit the c...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29678970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019640 |
_version_ | 1783316753251565568 |
---|---|
author | Cullington, Helen Kitterick, Padraig Weal, Mark Margol-Gromada, Magdalena |
author_facet | Cullington, Helen Kitterick, Padraig Weal, Mark Margol-Gromada, Magdalena |
author_sort | Cullington, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Substantial resources are required to provide lifelong postoperative care to people with cochlear implants. Most patients visit the clinic annually. We introduced a person-centred remote follow-up pathway, giving patients telemedicine tools to use at home so they would only visit the centre when intervention was required. OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of comparing a remote care pathway with the standard pathway in adults using cochlear implants. DESIGN: Two-arm randomised controlled trial. Randomisation used a minimisation approach, controlling for potential confounding factors. Participant blinding was not possible, but baseline measures occurred before allocation. SETTING: University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service: provider of National Health Service care. PARTICIPANTS: 60 adults who had used cochlear implants for at least 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: Control group (n=30) followed usual care pathway. Remote care group (n=30) received care remotely for 6 months incorporating: home hearing in noise test, online support tool and self-adjustment of device (only 10 had compatible equipment). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: change in patient activation; measured using the Patient Activation Measure. Secondary: change in hearing and quality of life; qualitative feedback from patients and clinicians. RESULTS: One participant in the remote care group dropped out. The remote care group showed a greater increase in patient activation than the control group. Changes in hearing differed between the groups. The remote care group improved on the Triple Digit Test hearing test; the control group perceived their hearing was worse on the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale questionnaire. Quality of life remained unchanged in both groups. Patients and clinicians were generally positive about remote care tools and wanted to continue. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with cochlear implants were willing to be randomised and complied with the protocol. Personalised remote care for long-term follow-up is feasible and acceptable, leading to more empowered patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14644286. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5914764 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59147642018-04-27 Feasibility of personalised remote long-term follow-up of people with cochlear implants: a randomised controlled trial Cullington, Helen Kitterick, Padraig Weal, Mark Margol-Gromada, Magdalena BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: Substantial resources are required to provide lifelong postoperative care to people with cochlear implants. Most patients visit the clinic annually. We introduced a person-centred remote follow-up pathway, giving patients telemedicine tools to use at home so they would only visit the centre when intervention was required. OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of comparing a remote care pathway with the standard pathway in adults using cochlear implants. DESIGN: Two-arm randomised controlled trial. Randomisation used a minimisation approach, controlling for potential confounding factors. Participant blinding was not possible, but baseline measures occurred before allocation. SETTING: University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service: provider of National Health Service care. PARTICIPANTS: 60 adults who had used cochlear implants for at least 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: Control group (n=30) followed usual care pathway. Remote care group (n=30) received care remotely for 6 months incorporating: home hearing in noise test, online support tool and self-adjustment of device (only 10 had compatible equipment). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: change in patient activation; measured using the Patient Activation Measure. Secondary: change in hearing and quality of life; qualitative feedback from patients and clinicians. RESULTS: One participant in the remote care group dropped out. The remote care group showed a greater increase in patient activation than the control group. Changes in hearing differed between the groups. The remote care group improved on the Triple Digit Test hearing test; the control group perceived their hearing was worse on the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale questionnaire. Quality of life remained unchanged in both groups. Patients and clinicians were generally positive about remote care tools and wanted to continue. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with cochlear implants were willing to be randomised and complied with the protocol. Personalised remote care for long-term follow-up is feasible and acceptable, leading to more empowered patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14644286. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5914764/ /pubmed/29678970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019640 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Cullington, Helen Kitterick, Padraig Weal, Mark Margol-Gromada, Magdalena Feasibility of personalised remote long-term follow-up of people with cochlear implants: a randomised controlled trial |
title | Feasibility of personalised remote long-term follow-up of people with cochlear implants: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Feasibility of personalised remote long-term follow-up of people with cochlear implants: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of personalised remote long-term follow-up of people with cochlear implants: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of personalised remote long-term follow-up of people with cochlear implants: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Feasibility of personalised remote long-term follow-up of people with cochlear implants: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | feasibility of personalised remote long-term follow-up of people with cochlear implants: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29678970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019640 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cullingtonhelen feasibilityofpersonalisedremotelongtermfollowupofpeoplewithcochlearimplantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kitterickpadraig feasibilityofpersonalisedremotelongtermfollowupofpeoplewithcochlearimplantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wealmark feasibilityofpersonalisedremotelongtermfollowupofpeoplewithcochlearimplantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT margolgromadamagdalena feasibilityofpersonalisedremotelongtermfollowupofpeoplewithcochlearimplantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial |