Cargando…

Economic evaluation of the Good School Toolkit: an intervention for reducing violence in primary schools in Uganda

INTRODUCTION: This paper presents the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Good School Toolkit (GST), a programme aimed at reducing physical violence perpetrated by school staff to students in Uganda. METHODS: The effectiveness of the Toolkit was tested with a cluster randomised controlled trial in 42...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greco, Giulia, Knight, Louise, Ssekadde, Willington, Namy, Sophie, Naker, Dipak, Devries, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000526
_version_ 1783316778358669312
author Greco, Giulia
Knight, Louise
Ssekadde, Willington
Namy, Sophie
Naker, Dipak
Devries, Karen
author_facet Greco, Giulia
Knight, Louise
Ssekadde, Willington
Namy, Sophie
Naker, Dipak
Devries, Karen
author_sort Greco, Giulia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This paper presents the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Good School Toolkit (GST), a programme aimed at reducing physical violence perpetrated by school staff to students in Uganda. METHODS: The effectiveness of the Toolkit was tested with a cluster randomised controlled trial in 42 primary schools in Luwero District, Uganda. A full economic costing evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis were conducted alongside the trial. Both financial and economic costs were collected retrospectively from the provider’s perspective to estimate total and unit costs. RESULTS: The total cost of setting up and running the Toolkit over the 18-month trial period is estimated at US$397 233, excluding process monitor (M&E) activities. The cost to run the intervention is US$7429 per school annually, or US$15 per primary school pupil annually, in the trial intervention schools. It is estimated that the intervention has averted 1620 cases of past-week physical violence during the 18-month implementation period. The total cost per case of violence averted is US$244, and the annual implementation cost is US$96 per case averted during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: The GST is a cost-effective intervention for reducing violence against pupils in primary schools in Uganda. It compares favourably against other violence reduction interventions in the region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5914895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59148952018-04-27 Economic evaluation of the Good School Toolkit: an intervention for reducing violence in primary schools in Uganda Greco, Giulia Knight, Louise Ssekadde, Willington Namy, Sophie Naker, Dipak Devries, Karen BMJ Glob Health Research INTRODUCTION: This paper presents the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Good School Toolkit (GST), a programme aimed at reducing physical violence perpetrated by school staff to students in Uganda. METHODS: The effectiveness of the Toolkit was tested with a cluster randomised controlled trial in 42 primary schools in Luwero District, Uganda. A full economic costing evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis were conducted alongside the trial. Both financial and economic costs were collected retrospectively from the provider’s perspective to estimate total and unit costs. RESULTS: The total cost of setting up and running the Toolkit over the 18-month trial period is estimated at US$397 233, excluding process monitor (M&E) activities. The cost to run the intervention is US$7429 per school annually, or US$15 per primary school pupil annually, in the trial intervention schools. It is estimated that the intervention has averted 1620 cases of past-week physical violence during the 18-month implementation period. The total cost per case of violence averted is US$244, and the annual implementation cost is US$96 per case averted during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: The GST is a cost-effective intervention for reducing violence against pupils in primary schools in Uganda. It compares favourably against other violence reduction interventions in the region. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5914895/ /pubmed/29707243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000526 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Greco, Giulia
Knight, Louise
Ssekadde, Willington
Namy, Sophie
Naker, Dipak
Devries, Karen
Economic evaluation of the Good School Toolkit: an intervention for reducing violence in primary schools in Uganda
title Economic evaluation of the Good School Toolkit: an intervention for reducing violence in primary schools in Uganda
title_full Economic evaluation of the Good School Toolkit: an intervention for reducing violence in primary schools in Uganda
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of the Good School Toolkit: an intervention for reducing violence in primary schools in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of the Good School Toolkit: an intervention for reducing violence in primary schools in Uganda
title_short Economic evaluation of the Good School Toolkit: an intervention for reducing violence in primary schools in Uganda
title_sort economic evaluation of the good school toolkit: an intervention for reducing violence in primary schools in uganda
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000526
work_keys_str_mv AT grecogiulia economicevaluationofthegoodschooltoolkitaninterventionforreducingviolenceinprimaryschoolsinuganda
AT knightlouise economicevaluationofthegoodschooltoolkitaninterventionforreducingviolenceinprimaryschoolsinuganda
AT ssekaddewillington economicevaluationofthegoodschooltoolkitaninterventionforreducingviolenceinprimaryschoolsinuganda
AT namysophie economicevaluationofthegoodschooltoolkitaninterventionforreducingviolenceinprimaryschoolsinuganda
AT nakerdipak economicevaluationofthegoodschooltoolkitaninterventionforreducingviolenceinprimaryschoolsinuganda
AT devrieskaren economicevaluationofthegoodschooltoolkitaninterventionforreducingviolenceinprimaryschoolsinuganda