Cargando…
Comparison of CHROMagar, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and polymerase chain reaction-fragment size for the identification of Candida species
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The epidemiological alteration in the distribution of Candida species, as well as the significantly increasing trend of either intrinsic or acquired resistance of some of these fungi highlights the need for a reliable method for the identification of the species. Polymerase c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Society of Medical Mycology
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707668 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/cmm.3.3.10 |
_version_ | 1783316783527100416 |
---|---|
author | Jafari, Zahra Motamedi, Marjan Jalalizand, Nilufar Shokoohi, Gholam. R Charsizadeh, Arezu Mirhendi, Hossein |
author_facet | Jafari, Zahra Motamedi, Marjan Jalalizand, Nilufar Shokoohi, Gholam. R Charsizadeh, Arezu Mirhendi, Hossein |
author_sort | Jafari, Zahra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The epidemiological alteration in the distribution of Candida species, as well as the significantly increasing trend of either intrinsic or acquired resistance of some of these fungi highlights the need for a reliable method for the identification of the species. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is one of the methods facilitating the quick and precise identification of Candida species. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of CHROMagar, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), and PCR-fragment size polymorphism (PCR-FSP) assays in the identification of Candida species to determine the benefits and limitations of these methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 107 Candida strains, including 20 standard strains and 87 clinical isolates. The identification of the isolates was accomplished by using CHROMagar as a conventional method. The PCR-RFLP assay was performed on the entire internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA (rDNA), and the consequent enzymatic digestion was compared with PCR-FSP results in which ITS1 and ITS2 regions were separately PCR amplified. In both molecular assays, yeast identification was carried out through the specific electrophoretic profiles of the PCR products. RESULTS: According to the results, the utilization of CHROMagar resulted in the identification of 29 (33.3%) Candida isolates, while the PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP facilitated the identification of 83 (95.4%) and 80 (91.9%) clinical isolates, respectively. The obtained concordances between CHROMagar and PCR-RFLP, between CHROMagar and PCR-FSP, as well as between PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP were 0.23, 0.20, and 0.77, respectively. CONCLUSION: The recognition of the benefits and limitations of PCR methods allows for the selection of the most efficient technique for a fast and correct differentiation. The PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP assays had satisfactory concordance. The PCR-FSP provides a rapid, technically simple, and cost-effective method for the identification of Candida species. Nevertheless, to accurately differentiate among the taxonomically related species, PCR-RFLP should be implemented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5914921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Iranian Society of Medical Mycology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59149212018-04-27 Comparison of CHROMagar, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and polymerase chain reaction-fragment size for the identification of Candida species Jafari, Zahra Motamedi, Marjan Jalalizand, Nilufar Shokoohi, Gholam. R Charsizadeh, Arezu Mirhendi, Hossein Curr Med Mycol Original Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The epidemiological alteration in the distribution of Candida species, as well as the significantly increasing trend of either intrinsic or acquired resistance of some of these fungi highlights the need for a reliable method for the identification of the species. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is one of the methods facilitating the quick and precise identification of Candida species. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of CHROMagar, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), and PCR-fragment size polymorphism (PCR-FSP) assays in the identification of Candida species to determine the benefits and limitations of these methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 107 Candida strains, including 20 standard strains and 87 clinical isolates. The identification of the isolates was accomplished by using CHROMagar as a conventional method. The PCR-RFLP assay was performed on the entire internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA (rDNA), and the consequent enzymatic digestion was compared with PCR-FSP results in which ITS1 and ITS2 regions were separately PCR amplified. In both molecular assays, yeast identification was carried out through the specific electrophoretic profiles of the PCR products. RESULTS: According to the results, the utilization of CHROMagar resulted in the identification of 29 (33.3%) Candida isolates, while the PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP facilitated the identification of 83 (95.4%) and 80 (91.9%) clinical isolates, respectively. The obtained concordances between CHROMagar and PCR-RFLP, between CHROMagar and PCR-FSP, as well as between PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP were 0.23, 0.20, and 0.77, respectively. CONCLUSION: The recognition of the benefits and limitations of PCR methods allows for the selection of the most efficient technique for a fast and correct differentiation. The PCR-RFLP and PCR-FSP assays had satisfactory concordance. The PCR-FSP provides a rapid, technically simple, and cost-effective method for the identification of Candida species. Nevertheless, to accurately differentiate among the taxonomically related species, PCR-RFLP should be implemented. Iranian Society of Medical Mycology 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5914921/ /pubmed/29707668 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/cmm.3.3.10 Text en © 2017, Published by Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences on behalf of Iranian Society of Medical Mycology and Invasive Fungi Research Center. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jafari, Zahra Motamedi, Marjan Jalalizand, Nilufar Shokoohi, Gholam. R Charsizadeh, Arezu Mirhendi, Hossein Comparison of CHROMagar, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and polymerase chain reaction-fragment size for the identification of Candida species |
title | Comparison of CHROMagar, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and polymerase chain reaction-fragment size for the identification of Candida species |
title_full | Comparison of CHROMagar, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and polymerase chain reaction-fragment size for the identification of Candida species |
title_fullStr | Comparison of CHROMagar, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and polymerase chain reaction-fragment size for the identification of Candida species |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of CHROMagar, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and polymerase chain reaction-fragment size for the identification of Candida species |
title_short | Comparison of CHROMagar, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and polymerase chain reaction-fragment size for the identification of Candida species |
title_sort | comparison of chromagar, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and polymerase chain reaction-fragment size for the identification of candida species |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29707668 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/cmm.3.3.10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jafarizahra comparisonofchromagarpolymerasechainreactionrestrictionfragmentlengthpolymorphismandpolymerasechainreactionfragmentsizefortheidentificationofcandidaspecies AT motamedimarjan comparisonofchromagarpolymerasechainreactionrestrictionfragmentlengthpolymorphismandpolymerasechainreactionfragmentsizefortheidentificationofcandidaspecies AT jalalizandnilufar comparisonofchromagarpolymerasechainreactionrestrictionfragmentlengthpolymorphismandpolymerasechainreactionfragmentsizefortheidentificationofcandidaspecies AT shokoohigholamr comparisonofchromagarpolymerasechainreactionrestrictionfragmentlengthpolymorphismandpolymerasechainreactionfragmentsizefortheidentificationofcandidaspecies AT charsizadeharezu comparisonofchromagarpolymerasechainreactionrestrictionfragmentlengthpolymorphismandpolymerasechainreactionfragmentsizefortheidentificationofcandidaspecies AT mirhendihossein comparisonofchromagarpolymerasechainreactionrestrictionfragmentlengthpolymorphismandpolymerasechainreactionfragmentsizefortheidentificationofcandidaspecies |