Cargando…
A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery
Resection control using magnetic resonance imaging during neurosurgical interventions increases confidence regarding the extent of tumor removal already during the procedure. In addition to morphological imaging, functional information such as perfusion might become an important marker of the presen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29719627 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24970 |
_version_ | 1783316814432829440 |
---|---|
author | Lindner, Thomas Ahmeti, Hajrullah Juhasz, Julia Helle, Michael Jansen, Olav Synowitz, Michael Ulmer, Stephan |
author_facet | Lindner, Thomas Ahmeti, Hajrullah Juhasz, Julia Helle, Michael Jansen, Olav Synowitz, Michael Ulmer, Stephan |
author_sort | Lindner, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Resection control using magnetic resonance imaging during neurosurgical interventions increases confidence regarding the extent of tumor removal already during the procedure. In addition to morphological imaging, functional information such as perfusion might become an important marker of the presence and extent of residual tumor mass. The aim of this study was to implement arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging as a noninvasive alternative to dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion imaging in patients suffering from intra-axial tumors for resection control already during surgery. The study included 15 patients suffering from glioblastoma multiforme in whom perfusion imaging using DSC and ASL was performed before, during, and after surgery. The data obtained from intraoperative scanning were analyzed by two readers blinded to any clinical information, and the presence of residual tumor mass was evaluated using a ranking scale. Similarity of results was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The results show that intraoperative ASL is as reliable as DSC when performing intraoperative perfusion imaging. According to the results of this study, intraoperative imaging using ASL represents an attractive alternative to contrast agent-based perfusion imaging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5915094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59150942018-05-01 A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery Lindner, Thomas Ahmeti, Hajrullah Juhasz, Julia Helle, Michael Jansen, Olav Synowitz, Michael Ulmer, Stephan Oncotarget Research Paper Resection control using magnetic resonance imaging during neurosurgical interventions increases confidence regarding the extent of tumor removal already during the procedure. In addition to morphological imaging, functional information such as perfusion might become an important marker of the presence and extent of residual tumor mass. The aim of this study was to implement arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging as a noninvasive alternative to dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion imaging in patients suffering from intra-axial tumors for resection control already during surgery. The study included 15 patients suffering from glioblastoma multiforme in whom perfusion imaging using DSC and ASL was performed before, during, and after surgery. The data obtained from intraoperative scanning were analyzed by two readers blinded to any clinical information, and the presence of residual tumor mass was evaluated using a ranking scale. Similarity of results was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The results show that intraoperative ASL is as reliable as DSC when performing intraoperative perfusion imaging. According to the results of this study, intraoperative imaging using ASL represents an attractive alternative to contrast agent-based perfusion imaging. Impact Journals LLC 2018-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5915094/ /pubmed/29719627 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24970 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Lindner et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Lindner, Thomas Ahmeti, Hajrullah Juhasz, Julia Helle, Michael Jansen, Olav Synowitz, Michael Ulmer, Stephan A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery |
title | A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery |
title_full | A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery |
title_fullStr | A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery |
title_short | A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery |
title_sort | comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29719627 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24970 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindnerthomas acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT ahmetihajrullah acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT juhaszjulia acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT hellemichael acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT jansenolav acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT synowitzmichael acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT ulmerstephan acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT lindnerthomas comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT ahmetihajrullah comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT juhaszjulia comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT hellemichael comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT jansenolav comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT synowitzmichael comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery AT ulmerstephan comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery |