Cargando…

A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery

Resection control using magnetic resonance imaging during neurosurgical interventions increases confidence regarding the extent of tumor removal already during the procedure. In addition to morphological imaging, functional information such as perfusion might become an important marker of the presen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindner, Thomas, Ahmeti, Hajrullah, Juhasz, Julia, Helle, Michael, Jansen, Olav, Synowitz, Michael, Ulmer, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29719627
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24970
_version_ 1783316814432829440
author Lindner, Thomas
Ahmeti, Hajrullah
Juhasz, Julia
Helle, Michael
Jansen, Olav
Synowitz, Michael
Ulmer, Stephan
author_facet Lindner, Thomas
Ahmeti, Hajrullah
Juhasz, Julia
Helle, Michael
Jansen, Olav
Synowitz, Michael
Ulmer, Stephan
author_sort Lindner, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Resection control using magnetic resonance imaging during neurosurgical interventions increases confidence regarding the extent of tumor removal already during the procedure. In addition to morphological imaging, functional information such as perfusion might become an important marker of the presence and extent of residual tumor mass. The aim of this study was to implement arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging as a noninvasive alternative to dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion imaging in patients suffering from intra-axial tumors for resection control already during surgery. The study included 15 patients suffering from glioblastoma multiforme in whom perfusion imaging using DSC and ASL was performed before, during, and after surgery. The data obtained from intraoperative scanning were analyzed by two readers blinded to any clinical information, and the presence of residual tumor mass was evaluated using a ranking scale. Similarity of results was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The results show that intraoperative ASL is as reliable as DSC when performing intraoperative perfusion imaging. According to the results of this study, intraoperative imaging using ASL represents an attractive alternative to contrast agent-based perfusion imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5915094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59150942018-05-01 A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery Lindner, Thomas Ahmeti, Hajrullah Juhasz, Julia Helle, Michael Jansen, Olav Synowitz, Michael Ulmer, Stephan Oncotarget Research Paper Resection control using magnetic resonance imaging during neurosurgical interventions increases confidence regarding the extent of tumor removal already during the procedure. In addition to morphological imaging, functional information such as perfusion might become an important marker of the presence and extent of residual tumor mass. The aim of this study was to implement arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging as a noninvasive alternative to dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion imaging in patients suffering from intra-axial tumors for resection control already during surgery. The study included 15 patients suffering from glioblastoma multiforme in whom perfusion imaging using DSC and ASL was performed before, during, and after surgery. The data obtained from intraoperative scanning were analyzed by two readers blinded to any clinical information, and the presence of residual tumor mass was evaluated using a ranking scale. Similarity of results was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The results show that intraoperative ASL is as reliable as DSC when performing intraoperative perfusion imaging. According to the results of this study, intraoperative imaging using ASL represents an attractive alternative to contrast agent-based perfusion imaging. Impact Journals LLC 2018-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5915094/ /pubmed/29719627 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24970 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Lindner et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Lindner, Thomas
Ahmeti, Hajrullah
Juhasz, Julia
Helle, Michael
Jansen, Olav
Synowitz, Michael
Ulmer, Stephan
A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery
title A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery
title_full A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery
title_fullStr A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery
title_short A comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery
title_sort comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility perfusion imaging for resection control in glioblastoma surgery
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29719627
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24970
work_keys_str_mv AT lindnerthomas acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT ahmetihajrullah acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT juhaszjulia acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT hellemichael acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT jansenolav acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT synowitzmichael acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT ulmerstephan acomparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT lindnerthomas comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT ahmetihajrullah comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT juhaszjulia comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT hellemichael comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT jansenolav comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT synowitzmichael comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery
AT ulmerstephan comparisonofarterialspinlabelinganddynamicsusceptibilityperfusionimagingforresectioncontrolinglioblastomasurgery