Cargando…

Impact of a “Diagonal” Intervention on Uptake of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services by Female Sex Workers in Mozambique: A Mixed-Methods Implementation Study

BACKGROUND: Female sex workers (FSWs) have high risks for adverse sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes, yet low access to services. Within an implementation research project enhancing uptake of SRH services by FSWs, we piloted a “diagonal” intervention, which combined strengthening of FSW-t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lafort, Yves, Lessitala, Faustino, Ismael de Melo, Malica Sofia, Griffin, Sally, Chersich, Matthew, Delva, Wim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721490
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00109
_version_ 1783316866292252672
author Lafort, Yves
Lessitala, Faustino
Ismael de Melo, Malica Sofia
Griffin, Sally
Chersich, Matthew
Delva, Wim
author_facet Lafort, Yves
Lessitala, Faustino
Ismael de Melo, Malica Sofia
Griffin, Sally
Chersich, Matthew
Delva, Wim
author_sort Lafort, Yves
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Female sex workers (FSWs) have high risks for adverse sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes, yet low access to services. Within an implementation research project enhancing uptake of SRH services by FSWs, we piloted a “diagonal” intervention, which combined strengthening of FSW-targeted services (vertical) with making public health facilities more FSW-friendly (horizontal), and tested its effect. METHODS: The study applied a convergent parallel mixed-methods design to assess changes in access to SRH services. Results of structured interviews with FSWs pre-intervention (N = 311) and thereafter (N = 404) were compared with the findings of eight post-intervention focus group discussions (FGDs) with FSWs and two with FSW-peer educators (PEs). RESULTS: Marked and statistically significant rises occurred in consistent condom use with all partners (55.3–67.7%), ever use of female condoms (37.9–54.5%), being tested for HIV in the past 6 months (56.0–76.6%), using contraception (84.5–95.4%), ever screened for cervical cancer (0.0–16.9%) and having ≥10 contacts with a PE in the past year (0.5–24.45%). Increases mostly resulted from FSW-targeted outreach, with no rise detected in utilization of public health facilities. FGD participants reported that some facilities had become more FSW-friendly, but barriers such as stock-outs, being asked for bribes and disrespectful treatment persisted. CONCLUSION: The combination of expanding FSW-targeted SRH services with improving access to the public health services resulted in an overall increased uptake of services, but almost exclusively because of the strengthened targeted (vertical) outreach services. Utilization of public SRH services had not yet increased and many barriers to access remained. Our diagonal approach was thus only successful in its vertical component. Improving access to the general health services remains nevertheless important and further research is needed how to reduce barriers. Ideally, the combination approach should be maintained and more successful approaches to increase utilization of public services should be explored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5915464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59154642018-05-02 Impact of a “Diagonal” Intervention on Uptake of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services by Female Sex Workers in Mozambique: A Mixed-Methods Implementation Study Lafort, Yves Lessitala, Faustino Ismael de Melo, Malica Sofia Griffin, Sally Chersich, Matthew Delva, Wim Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Female sex workers (FSWs) have high risks for adverse sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes, yet low access to services. Within an implementation research project enhancing uptake of SRH services by FSWs, we piloted a “diagonal” intervention, which combined strengthening of FSW-targeted services (vertical) with making public health facilities more FSW-friendly (horizontal), and tested its effect. METHODS: The study applied a convergent parallel mixed-methods design to assess changes in access to SRH services. Results of structured interviews with FSWs pre-intervention (N = 311) and thereafter (N = 404) were compared with the findings of eight post-intervention focus group discussions (FGDs) with FSWs and two with FSW-peer educators (PEs). RESULTS: Marked and statistically significant rises occurred in consistent condom use with all partners (55.3–67.7%), ever use of female condoms (37.9–54.5%), being tested for HIV in the past 6 months (56.0–76.6%), using contraception (84.5–95.4%), ever screened for cervical cancer (0.0–16.9%) and having ≥10 contacts with a PE in the past year (0.5–24.45%). Increases mostly resulted from FSW-targeted outreach, with no rise detected in utilization of public health facilities. FGD participants reported that some facilities had become more FSW-friendly, but barriers such as stock-outs, being asked for bribes and disrespectful treatment persisted. CONCLUSION: The combination of expanding FSW-targeted SRH services with improving access to the public health services resulted in an overall increased uptake of services, but almost exclusively because of the strengthened targeted (vertical) outreach services. Utilization of public SRH services had not yet increased and many barriers to access remained. Our diagonal approach was thus only successful in its vertical component. Improving access to the general health services remains nevertheless important and further research is needed how to reduce barriers. Ideally, the combination approach should be maintained and more successful approaches to increase utilization of public services should be explored. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5915464/ /pubmed/29721490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00109 Text en Copyright © 2018 Lafort, Lessitala, Ismael de Melo, Griffin, Chersich and Delva. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Lafort, Yves
Lessitala, Faustino
Ismael de Melo, Malica Sofia
Griffin, Sally
Chersich, Matthew
Delva, Wim
Impact of a “Diagonal” Intervention on Uptake of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services by Female Sex Workers in Mozambique: A Mixed-Methods Implementation Study
title Impact of a “Diagonal” Intervention on Uptake of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services by Female Sex Workers in Mozambique: A Mixed-Methods Implementation Study
title_full Impact of a “Diagonal” Intervention on Uptake of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services by Female Sex Workers in Mozambique: A Mixed-Methods Implementation Study
title_fullStr Impact of a “Diagonal” Intervention on Uptake of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services by Female Sex Workers in Mozambique: A Mixed-Methods Implementation Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a “Diagonal” Intervention on Uptake of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services by Female Sex Workers in Mozambique: A Mixed-Methods Implementation Study
title_short Impact of a “Diagonal” Intervention on Uptake of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services by Female Sex Workers in Mozambique: A Mixed-Methods Implementation Study
title_sort impact of a “diagonal” intervention on uptake of sexual and reproductive health services by female sex workers in mozambique: a mixed-methods implementation study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721490
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00109
work_keys_str_mv AT lafortyves impactofadiagonalinterventiononuptakeofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesbyfemalesexworkersinmozambiqueamixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT lessitalafaustino impactofadiagonalinterventiononuptakeofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesbyfemalesexworkersinmozambiqueamixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT ismaeldemelomalicasofia impactofadiagonalinterventiononuptakeofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesbyfemalesexworkersinmozambiqueamixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT griffinsally impactofadiagonalinterventiononuptakeofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesbyfemalesexworkersinmozambiqueamixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT chersichmatthew impactofadiagonalinterventiononuptakeofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesbyfemalesexworkersinmozambiqueamixedmethodsimplementationstudy
AT delvawim impactofadiagonalinterventiononuptakeofsexualandreproductivehealthservicesbyfemalesexworkersinmozambiqueamixedmethodsimplementationstudy