Cargando…
Preoperative Molecular Markers in Thyroid Nodules
The need for distinguishing benign from malignant thyroid nodules has led to the pursuit of differentiating molecular markers. The most common molecular tests in clinical use are Afirma(®) Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) and Thyroseq(®) V2. Despite the rapidly developing field of molecular markers,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29720964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00179 |
Sumario: | The need for distinguishing benign from malignant thyroid nodules has led to the pursuit of differentiating molecular markers. The most common molecular tests in clinical use are Afirma(®) Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) and Thyroseq(®) V2. Despite the rapidly developing field of molecular markers, several limitations exist. These challenges include the recent introduction of the histopathological diagnosis “Non-Invasive Follicular Thyroid neoplasm with Papillary-like nuclear features”, the correlation of genetic mutations within both benign and malignant pathologic diagnoses, the lack of follow-up of molecular marker negative nodules, and the cost-effectiveness of molecular markers. In this manuscript, we review the current published literature surrounding the diagnostic value of Afirma(®) GEC and Thyroseq(®) V2. Among Afirma(®) GEC studies, sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) ranged from 75 to 100%, 5 to 53%, 13 to 100%, and 20 to 100%, respectively. Among Thyroseq(®) V2 studies, Se, Sp, PPV, and NPV ranged from 40 to 100%, 56 to 93%, 13 to 90%, and 48 to 97%, respectively. We also discuss current challenges to Afirma(®) GEC and Thyroseq(®) V2 utility and clinical application, and preview the future directions of these rapidly developing technologies. |
---|