Cargando…

New approaches to the analysis of eye movement behaviour across expertise while viewing brain MRIs

Brain tumour detection and diagnosis requires clinicians to inspect and analyse brain magnetic resonance images. Eye-tracking is commonly used to examine observers’ gaze behaviour during such medical image interpretation tasks, but analysis of eye movement sequences is limited. We therefore used Sca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crowe, Emily M., Gilchrist, Iain D., Kent, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0097-4
_version_ 1783316878165278720
author Crowe, Emily M.
Gilchrist, Iain D.
Kent, Christopher
author_facet Crowe, Emily M.
Gilchrist, Iain D.
Kent, Christopher
author_sort Crowe, Emily M.
collection PubMed
description Brain tumour detection and diagnosis requires clinicians to inspect and analyse brain magnetic resonance images. Eye-tracking is commonly used to examine observers’ gaze behaviour during such medical image interpretation tasks, but analysis of eye movement sequences is limited. We therefore used ScanMatch, a novel technique that compares saccadic eye movement sequences, to examine the effect of expertise and diagnosis on the similarity of scanning patterns. Diagnostic accuracy was also recorded. Thirty-five participants were classified as Novices, Medics and Experts based on their level of expertise. Participants completed two brain tumour detection tasks. The first was a whole-brain task, which consisted of 60 consecutively presented slices from one patient; the second was an independent-slice detection task, which consisted of 32 independent slices from five different patients. Experts displayed the highest accuracy and sensitivity followed by Medics and then Novices in the independent-slice task. Experts showed the highest level of scanning pattern similarity, with medics engaging in the least similar scanning patterns, for both the whole-brain and independent-slice task. In the independent-slice task, scanning patterns were the least similar for false negatives across all expertise levels and most similar for experts when they responded correctly. These results demonstrate the value of using ScanMatch in the medical image perception literature. Future research adopting this tool could, for example, identify cases that yield low scanning similarity and so provide insight into why diagnostic errors occur and ultimately help in training radiologists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5915515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59155152018-04-30 New approaches to the analysis of eye movement behaviour across expertise while viewing brain MRIs Crowe, Emily M. Gilchrist, Iain D. Kent, Christopher Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article Brain tumour detection and diagnosis requires clinicians to inspect and analyse brain magnetic resonance images. Eye-tracking is commonly used to examine observers’ gaze behaviour during such medical image interpretation tasks, but analysis of eye movement sequences is limited. We therefore used ScanMatch, a novel technique that compares saccadic eye movement sequences, to examine the effect of expertise and diagnosis on the similarity of scanning patterns. Diagnostic accuracy was also recorded. Thirty-five participants were classified as Novices, Medics and Experts based on their level of expertise. Participants completed two brain tumour detection tasks. The first was a whole-brain task, which consisted of 60 consecutively presented slices from one patient; the second was an independent-slice detection task, which consisted of 32 independent slices from five different patients. Experts displayed the highest accuracy and sensitivity followed by Medics and then Novices in the independent-slice task. Experts showed the highest level of scanning pattern similarity, with medics engaging in the least similar scanning patterns, for both the whole-brain and independent-slice task. In the independent-slice task, scanning patterns were the least similar for false negatives across all expertise levels and most similar for experts when they responded correctly. These results demonstrate the value of using ScanMatch in the medical image perception literature. Future research adopting this tool could, for example, identify cases that yield low scanning similarity and so provide insight into why diagnostic errors occur and ultimately help in training radiologists. Springer International Publishing 2018-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5915515/ /pubmed/29721518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0097-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Crowe, Emily M.
Gilchrist, Iain D.
Kent, Christopher
New approaches to the analysis of eye movement behaviour across expertise while viewing brain MRIs
title New approaches to the analysis of eye movement behaviour across expertise while viewing brain MRIs
title_full New approaches to the analysis of eye movement behaviour across expertise while viewing brain MRIs
title_fullStr New approaches to the analysis of eye movement behaviour across expertise while viewing brain MRIs
title_full_unstemmed New approaches to the analysis of eye movement behaviour across expertise while viewing brain MRIs
title_short New approaches to the analysis of eye movement behaviour across expertise while viewing brain MRIs
title_sort new approaches to the analysis of eye movement behaviour across expertise while viewing brain mris
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0097-4
work_keys_str_mv AT croweemilym newapproachestotheanalysisofeyemovementbehaviouracrossexpertisewhileviewingbrainmris
AT gilchristiaind newapproachestotheanalysisofeyemovementbehaviouracrossexpertisewhileviewingbrainmris
AT kentchristopher newapproachestotheanalysisofeyemovementbehaviouracrossexpertisewhileviewingbrainmris