Cargando…

Insight and inference for DVARS

Estimates of functional connectivity using resting state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) are acutely sensitive to artifacts and large scale nuisance variation. As a result much effort is dedicated to preprocessing rs-fMRI data and using diagnostic measures to identify bad scans. One...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afyouni, Soroosh, Nichols, Thomas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29307608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.098
_version_ 1783316892136505344
author Afyouni, Soroosh
Nichols, Thomas E.
author_facet Afyouni, Soroosh
Nichols, Thomas E.
author_sort Afyouni, Soroosh
collection PubMed
description Estimates of functional connectivity using resting state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) are acutely sensitive to artifacts and large scale nuisance variation. As a result much effort is dedicated to preprocessing rs-fMRI data and using diagnostic measures to identify bad scans. One such diagnostic measure is DVARS, the spatial root mean square of the data after temporal differencing. A limitation of DVARS however is the lack of concrete interpretation of the absolute values of DVARS, and finding a threshold to distinguish bad scans from good. In this work we describe a sum of squares decomposition of the entire 4D dataset that shows DVARS to be just one of three sources of variation we refer to as D-var (closely linked to DVARS), S-var and E-var. D-var and S-var partition the sum of squares at adjacent time points, while E-var accounts for edge effects; each can be used to make spatial and temporal summary diagnostic measures. Extending the partitioning to global (and non-global) signal leads to a rs-fMRI DSE table, which decomposes the total and global variability into fast (D-var), slow (S-var) and edge (E-var) components. We find expected values for each component under nominal models, showing how D-var (and thus DVARS) scales with overall variability and is diminished by temporal autocorrelation. Finally we propose a null sampling distribution for DVARS-squared and robust methods to estimate this null model, allowing computation of DVARS p-values. We propose that these diagnostic time series, images, p-values and DSE table will provide a succinct summary of the quality of a rs-fMRI dataset that will support comparisons of datasets over preprocessing steps and between subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5915574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59155742018-05-15 Insight and inference for DVARS Afyouni, Soroosh Nichols, Thomas E. Neuroimage Article Estimates of functional connectivity using resting state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) are acutely sensitive to artifacts and large scale nuisance variation. As a result much effort is dedicated to preprocessing rs-fMRI data and using diagnostic measures to identify bad scans. One such diagnostic measure is DVARS, the spatial root mean square of the data after temporal differencing. A limitation of DVARS however is the lack of concrete interpretation of the absolute values of DVARS, and finding a threshold to distinguish bad scans from good. In this work we describe a sum of squares decomposition of the entire 4D dataset that shows DVARS to be just one of three sources of variation we refer to as D-var (closely linked to DVARS), S-var and E-var. D-var and S-var partition the sum of squares at adjacent time points, while E-var accounts for edge effects; each can be used to make spatial and temporal summary diagnostic measures. Extending the partitioning to global (and non-global) signal leads to a rs-fMRI DSE table, which decomposes the total and global variability into fast (D-var), slow (S-var) and edge (E-var) components. We find expected values for each component under nominal models, showing how D-var (and thus DVARS) scales with overall variability and is diminished by temporal autocorrelation. Finally we propose a null sampling distribution for DVARS-squared and robust methods to estimate this null model, allowing computation of DVARS p-values. We propose that these diagnostic time series, images, p-values and DSE table will provide a succinct summary of the quality of a rs-fMRI dataset that will support comparisons of datasets over preprocessing steps and between subjects. Academic Press 2018-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5915574/ /pubmed/29307608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.098 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Afyouni, Soroosh
Nichols, Thomas E.
Insight and inference for DVARS
title Insight and inference for DVARS
title_full Insight and inference for DVARS
title_fullStr Insight and inference for DVARS
title_full_unstemmed Insight and inference for DVARS
title_short Insight and inference for DVARS
title_sort insight and inference for dvars
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29307608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.098
work_keys_str_mv AT afyounisoroosh insightandinferencefordvars
AT nicholsthomase insightandinferencefordvars