Cargando…

Professional Quality of Life among Professional Care Providers at Cancer Palliative Care Centers in Bengaluru, India

CONTEXT: Being a professional care provider at cancer palliative care settings is demanding and stressful. Literature has indicated the prevalence of high burnout (BO) and distress; however, there is a dearth of studies in India, with no study available on professional quality of life in the field o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Amanpreet, Sharma, Mahendra P, Chaturvedi, Santosh K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736119
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_31_18
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: Being a professional care provider at cancer palliative care settings is demanding and stressful. Literature has indicated the prevalence of high burnout (BO) and distress; however, there is a dearth of studies in India, with no study available on professional quality of life in the field of palliative care. AIMS: The aim of the present study was to explore the professional quality of life, namely-compassion satisfaction [CS], burnout [BO], and secondary traumatic stress [STS] among professional care providers at cancer palliative care centers. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A cross-sectional, descriptive, and quantitative study was carried out at four cancer palliative care centers in Bengaluru after the permissions and ethical approvals. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The tools used were brief sociodemographic datasheet and professional quality of life (ProQoL)-Version 5 administered with 65 participants (mean age = 32.5 and standard deviation = 11.78) with work experience of at least 6 months. ANALYSIS: A descriptive, correlational, and inferential analysis of the quantitative data was undertaken. RESULTS: The results revealed that an average level of CS and BO was reported by 32 (49.2%) and 35 (53.8%) study participants, respectively, while 62 (95.4%) participants reported higher STS on ProQoL scale-Version 5. Significant differences in levels of CS, BO, and STS were found based on additional training taken in palliative care (P = 0.01), designation type (P < 0.001), and workplace type (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The overall results strongly suggest that a short intervention targeting STS and BO can help the study population and further enhance their CS and patient care.