Cargando…

Computer screening for palliative care needs in primary care: a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: Though the majority of people could benefit from palliative care before they die, most do not receive this approach, especially those with multimorbidity and frailty. GPs find it difficult to identify such patients. AIM: To refine and evaluate the utility of a computer application (Antic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mason, Bruce, Boyd, Kirsty, Steyn, John, Kendall, Marilyn, Macpherson, Stella, Murray, Scott A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29581129
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X695729
_version_ 1783316957404069888
author Mason, Bruce
Boyd, Kirsty
Steyn, John
Kendall, Marilyn
Macpherson, Stella
Murray, Scott A
author_facet Mason, Bruce
Boyd, Kirsty
Steyn, John
Kendall, Marilyn
Macpherson, Stella
Murray, Scott A
author_sort Mason, Bruce
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Though the majority of people could benefit from palliative care before they die, most do not receive this approach, especially those with multimorbidity and frailty. GPs find it difficult to identify such patients. AIM: To refine and evaluate the utility of a computer application (AnticiPal) to help primary care teams screen their registered patients for people who could benefit from palliative care. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed-methods study of eight GP practices in Scotland, conducted in 2016–2017. METHOD: After a search development cycle the authors adopted a mixed-methods approach, combining analysis of the number of people identified by the search with qualitative observations of the computer search as used by primary care teams, and interviews with professionals and patients. RESULTS: The search identified 0.8% of 62 708 registered patients. A total of 27 multidisciplinary meetings were observed, and eight GPs and 10 patients were interviewed. GPs thought the search identified many unrecognised patients with advanced multimorbidity and frailty, but were concerned about workload implications of assessment and care planning. Patients and carers endorsed the value of proactive identification of people with advanced illness. CONCLUSION: GP practices can use computer searching to generate lists of patients for review and care planning. The challenges of starting a conversation about the future remain. However, most patients regard key components of palliative care (proactive planning, including sharing information with urgent care services) as important. Screening for people with deteriorating health at risk from unplanned care is a current focus for quality improvement and should not be limited by labelling it solely as ‘palliative care’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5916083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59160832018-05-04 Computer screening for palliative care needs in primary care: a mixed-methods study Mason, Bruce Boyd, Kirsty Steyn, John Kendall, Marilyn Macpherson, Stella Murray, Scott A Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Though the majority of people could benefit from palliative care before they die, most do not receive this approach, especially those with multimorbidity and frailty. GPs find it difficult to identify such patients. AIM: To refine and evaluate the utility of a computer application (AnticiPal) to help primary care teams screen their registered patients for people who could benefit from palliative care. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed-methods study of eight GP practices in Scotland, conducted in 2016–2017. METHOD: After a search development cycle the authors adopted a mixed-methods approach, combining analysis of the number of people identified by the search with qualitative observations of the computer search as used by primary care teams, and interviews with professionals and patients. RESULTS: The search identified 0.8% of 62 708 registered patients. A total of 27 multidisciplinary meetings were observed, and eight GPs and 10 patients were interviewed. GPs thought the search identified many unrecognised patients with advanced multimorbidity and frailty, but were concerned about workload implications of assessment and care planning. Patients and carers endorsed the value of proactive identification of people with advanced illness. CONCLUSION: GP practices can use computer searching to generate lists of patients for review and care planning. The challenges of starting a conversation about the future remain. However, most patients regard key components of palliative care (proactive planning, including sharing information with urgent care services) as important. Screening for people with deteriorating health at risk from unplanned care is a current focus for quality improvement and should not be limited by labelling it solely as ‘palliative care’. Royal College of General Practitioners 2018-05 2018-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5916083/ /pubmed/29581129 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X695729 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2018 This article is Open Access: CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research
Mason, Bruce
Boyd, Kirsty
Steyn, John
Kendall, Marilyn
Macpherson, Stella
Murray, Scott A
Computer screening for palliative care needs in primary care: a mixed-methods study
title Computer screening for palliative care needs in primary care: a mixed-methods study
title_full Computer screening for palliative care needs in primary care: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Computer screening for palliative care needs in primary care: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Computer screening for palliative care needs in primary care: a mixed-methods study
title_short Computer screening for palliative care needs in primary care: a mixed-methods study
title_sort computer screening for palliative care needs in primary care: a mixed-methods study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29581129
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X695729
work_keys_str_mv AT masonbruce computerscreeningforpalliativecareneedsinprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy
AT boydkirsty computerscreeningforpalliativecareneedsinprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy
AT steynjohn computerscreeningforpalliativecareneedsinprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy
AT kendallmarilyn computerscreeningforpalliativecareneedsinprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy
AT macphersonstella computerscreeningforpalliativecareneedsinprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy
AT murrayscotta computerscreeningforpalliativecareneedsinprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy