Cargando…
Comparing the consequences of natural selection, adaptive phenotypic plasticity, and matching habitat choice for phenotype–environment matching, population genetic structure, and reproductive isolation in meta‐populations
Organisms commonly experience significant spatiotemporal variation in their environments. In response to such heterogeneity, different mechanisms may act that enhance ecological performance locally. However, depending on the nature of the mechanism involved, the consequences for populations may diff...
Autores principales: | Nicolaus, Marion, Edelaar, Pim |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3816 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Phenotype-dependent habitat choice is too weak to cause assortative mating between Drosophila melanogaster strains differing in light sensitivity
por: Peralta-Rincón, Juan Ramón, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Phenotype–environment matching in sand fleas
por: Stevens, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Rethinking phenotypic plasticity and its consequences for individuals, populations and species
por: Forsman, A
Publicado: (2015) -
How phenotypic matching based on neutral mating cues enables speciation in locally adapted populations
por: Sibly, Richard M., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Trait-specific consequences of inbreeding on adaptive phenotypic plasticity
por: Schou, Mads F, et al.
Publicado: (2015)