Cargando…
The effect of gut microbiota elimination in Drosophila melanogaster: A how‐to guide for host–microbiota studies
In recent years, there has been a surge in interest in the effects of the microbiota on the host. Increasingly, we are coming to understand the importance of the gut microbiota in modulating host physiology, ecology, behavior, and evolution. One method utilized to evaluate the effect of the microbio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3991 |
_version_ | 1783316996192993280 |
---|---|
author | Heys, Chloe Lizé, Anne Blow, Frances White, Lewis Darby, Alistair Lewis, Zenobia J. |
author_facet | Heys, Chloe Lizé, Anne Blow, Frances White, Lewis Darby, Alistair Lewis, Zenobia J. |
author_sort | Heys, Chloe |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, there has been a surge in interest in the effects of the microbiota on the host. Increasingly, we are coming to understand the importance of the gut microbiota in modulating host physiology, ecology, behavior, and evolution. One method utilized to evaluate the effect of the microbiota is to suppress or eliminate it, and compare the effect on the host with that of untreated individuals. In this study, we evaluate some of these commonly used methods in the model organism, Drosophila melanogaster. We test the efficacy of a low‐dose streptomycin diet, egg dechorionation, and an axenic or sterile diet, in the removal of gut bacteria within this species in a fully factorial design. We further determine potential side effects of these methods on host physiology by performing a series of standard physiological assays. Our results showed that individuals from all treatments took significantly longer to develop, and weighed less, compared to normal flies. Males and females that had undergone egg dechorionation weighed significantly less than streptomycin reared individuals. Similarly, axenic female flies, but not males, were much less active when analyzed in a locomotion assay. All methods decreased the egg to adult survival, with egg dechorionation inducing significantly higher mortality. We conclude that low‐dose streptomycin added to the dietary media is more effective at removing the gut bacteria than egg dechorionation and has somewhat less detrimental effects to host physiology. More importantly, this method is the most practical and reliable for use in behavioral research. Our study raises the important issue that the efficacy of and impacts on the host of these methods require investigation in a case‐by‐case manner, rather than assuming homogeneity across species and laboratories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5916298 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59162982018-05-02 The effect of gut microbiota elimination in Drosophila melanogaster: A how‐to guide for host–microbiota studies Heys, Chloe Lizé, Anne Blow, Frances White, Lewis Darby, Alistair Lewis, Zenobia J. Ecol Evol Original Research In recent years, there has been a surge in interest in the effects of the microbiota on the host. Increasingly, we are coming to understand the importance of the gut microbiota in modulating host physiology, ecology, behavior, and evolution. One method utilized to evaluate the effect of the microbiota is to suppress or eliminate it, and compare the effect on the host with that of untreated individuals. In this study, we evaluate some of these commonly used methods in the model organism, Drosophila melanogaster. We test the efficacy of a low‐dose streptomycin diet, egg dechorionation, and an axenic or sterile diet, in the removal of gut bacteria within this species in a fully factorial design. We further determine potential side effects of these methods on host physiology by performing a series of standard physiological assays. Our results showed that individuals from all treatments took significantly longer to develop, and weighed less, compared to normal flies. Males and females that had undergone egg dechorionation weighed significantly less than streptomycin reared individuals. Similarly, axenic female flies, but not males, were much less active when analyzed in a locomotion assay. All methods decreased the egg to adult survival, with egg dechorionation inducing significantly higher mortality. We conclude that low‐dose streptomycin added to the dietary media is more effective at removing the gut bacteria than egg dechorionation and has somewhat less detrimental effects to host physiology. More importantly, this method is the most practical and reliable for use in behavioral research. Our study raises the important issue that the efficacy of and impacts on the host of these methods require investigation in a case‐by‐case manner, rather than assuming homogeneity across species and laboratories. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5916298/ /pubmed/29721287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3991 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Heys, Chloe Lizé, Anne Blow, Frances White, Lewis Darby, Alistair Lewis, Zenobia J. The effect of gut microbiota elimination in Drosophila melanogaster: A how‐to guide for host–microbiota studies |
title | The effect of gut microbiota elimination in Drosophila melanogaster: A how‐to guide for host–microbiota studies |
title_full | The effect of gut microbiota elimination in Drosophila melanogaster: A how‐to guide for host–microbiota studies |
title_fullStr | The effect of gut microbiota elimination in Drosophila melanogaster: A how‐to guide for host–microbiota studies |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of gut microbiota elimination in Drosophila melanogaster: A how‐to guide for host–microbiota studies |
title_short | The effect of gut microbiota elimination in Drosophila melanogaster: A how‐to guide for host–microbiota studies |
title_sort | effect of gut microbiota elimination in drosophila melanogaster: a how‐to guide for host–microbiota studies |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3991 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heyschloe theeffectofgutmicrobiotaeliminationindrosophilamelanogasterahowtoguideforhostmicrobiotastudies AT lizeanne theeffectofgutmicrobiotaeliminationindrosophilamelanogasterahowtoguideforhostmicrobiotastudies AT blowfrances theeffectofgutmicrobiotaeliminationindrosophilamelanogasterahowtoguideforhostmicrobiotastudies AT whitelewis theeffectofgutmicrobiotaeliminationindrosophilamelanogasterahowtoguideforhostmicrobiotastudies AT darbyalistair theeffectofgutmicrobiotaeliminationindrosophilamelanogasterahowtoguideforhostmicrobiotastudies AT lewiszenobiaj theeffectofgutmicrobiotaeliminationindrosophilamelanogasterahowtoguideforhostmicrobiotastudies AT heyschloe effectofgutmicrobiotaeliminationindrosophilamelanogasterahowtoguideforhostmicrobiotastudies AT lizeanne effectofgutmicrobiotaeliminationindrosophilamelanogasterahowtoguideforhostmicrobiotastudies AT blowfrances effectofgutmicrobiotaeliminationindrosophilamelanogasterahowtoguideforhostmicrobiotastudies AT whitelewis effectofgutmicrobiotaeliminationindrosophilamelanogasterahowtoguideforhostmicrobiotastudies AT darbyalistair effectofgutmicrobiotaeliminationindrosophilamelanogasterahowtoguideforhostmicrobiotastudies AT lewiszenobiaj effectofgutmicrobiotaeliminationindrosophilamelanogasterahowtoguideforhostmicrobiotastudies |