Cargando…

The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India

BACKGROUND: Unsafe disposal of child faeces is persistent and may lead to considerable impact on the health of young children. Research is limited on the impact of sanitation or hygiene interventions to improve child faeces disposal practices. METHODS: In the context of a randomised controlled trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freeman, Matthew C., Majorin, Fiona, Boisson, Sophie, Routray, Parimita, Torondel, Belen, Clasen, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27496512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trw043
_version_ 1783317001607839744
author Freeman, Matthew C.
Majorin, Fiona
Boisson, Sophie
Routray, Parimita
Torondel, Belen
Clasen, Thomas
author_facet Freeman, Matthew C.
Majorin, Fiona
Boisson, Sophie
Routray, Parimita
Torondel, Belen
Clasen, Thomas
author_sort Freeman, Matthew C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unsafe disposal of child faeces is persistent and may lead to considerable impact on the health of young children. Research is limited on the impact of sanitation or hygiene interventions to improve child faeces disposal practices. METHODS: In the context of a randomised controlled trial to assess the health impact of a programme in Odisha, India, to promote rural sanitation under the Government of India's Total Sanitation Campaign, we explored whether the intervention affected the safe disposal of faeces of children under-5 years of age. RESULTS: At baseline, 1.1% of households practised ‘safe’ disposal of child faeces, either disposing it in a toilet or by burial. The intervention increased safe disposal of child faeces to 10.4% in intervention households, compared to 3.1% in the control households (RR 3.34; 95% CI 1.99–5.59). This increase in safe disposal is attributable to increases in latrine presence in the intervention communities; the intervention did not change safe disposal practices above and beyond the increase in latrine coverage. CONCLUSIONS: The very modest increase in safe disposal, while statistically significant, is not likely to have consequential health benefit. To achieve open defecation free communities, sanitation interventions will need to develop behaviour change approaches to explicitly target safe disposal behaviours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5916378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59163782018-04-30 The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India Freeman, Matthew C. Majorin, Fiona Boisson, Sophie Routray, Parimita Torondel, Belen Clasen, Thomas Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Article BACKGROUND: Unsafe disposal of child faeces is persistent and may lead to considerable impact on the health of young children. Research is limited on the impact of sanitation or hygiene interventions to improve child faeces disposal practices. METHODS: In the context of a randomised controlled trial to assess the health impact of a programme in Odisha, India, to promote rural sanitation under the Government of India's Total Sanitation Campaign, we explored whether the intervention affected the safe disposal of faeces of children under-5 years of age. RESULTS: At baseline, 1.1% of households practised ‘safe’ disposal of child faeces, either disposing it in a toilet or by burial. The intervention increased safe disposal of child faeces to 10.4% in intervention households, compared to 3.1% in the control households (RR 3.34; 95% CI 1.99–5.59). This increase in safe disposal is attributable to increases in latrine presence in the intervention communities; the intervention did not change safe disposal practices above and beyond the increase in latrine coverage. CONCLUSIONS: The very modest increase in safe disposal, while statistically significant, is not likely to have consequential health benefit. To achieve open defecation free communities, sanitation interventions will need to develop behaviour change approaches to explicitly target safe disposal behaviours. Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2016-07 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5916378/ /pubmed/27496512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trw043 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Freeman, Matthew C.
Majorin, Fiona
Boisson, Sophie
Routray, Parimita
Torondel, Belen
Clasen, Thomas
The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India
title The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India
title_full The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India
title_fullStr The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India
title_full_unstemmed The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India
title_short The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India
title_sort impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in odisha, india
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27496512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trw043
work_keys_str_mv AT freemanmatthewc theimpactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia
AT majorinfiona theimpactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia
AT boissonsophie theimpactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia
AT routrayparimita theimpactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia
AT torondelbelen theimpactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia
AT clasenthomas theimpactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia
AT freemanmatthewc impactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia
AT majorinfiona impactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia
AT boissonsophie impactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia
AT routrayparimita impactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia
AT torondelbelen impactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia
AT clasenthomas impactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia