Cargando…
The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India
BACKGROUND: Unsafe disposal of child faeces is persistent and may lead to considerable impact on the health of young children. Research is limited on the impact of sanitation or hygiene interventions to improve child faeces disposal practices. METHODS: In the context of a randomised controlled trial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27496512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trw043 |
_version_ | 1783317001607839744 |
---|---|
author | Freeman, Matthew C. Majorin, Fiona Boisson, Sophie Routray, Parimita Torondel, Belen Clasen, Thomas |
author_facet | Freeman, Matthew C. Majorin, Fiona Boisson, Sophie Routray, Parimita Torondel, Belen Clasen, Thomas |
author_sort | Freeman, Matthew C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Unsafe disposal of child faeces is persistent and may lead to considerable impact on the health of young children. Research is limited on the impact of sanitation or hygiene interventions to improve child faeces disposal practices. METHODS: In the context of a randomised controlled trial to assess the health impact of a programme in Odisha, India, to promote rural sanitation under the Government of India's Total Sanitation Campaign, we explored whether the intervention affected the safe disposal of faeces of children under-5 years of age. RESULTS: At baseline, 1.1% of households practised ‘safe’ disposal of child faeces, either disposing it in a toilet or by burial. The intervention increased safe disposal of child faeces to 10.4% in intervention households, compared to 3.1% in the control households (RR 3.34; 95% CI 1.99–5.59). This increase in safe disposal is attributable to increases in latrine presence in the intervention communities; the intervention did not change safe disposal practices above and beyond the increase in latrine coverage. CONCLUSIONS: The very modest increase in safe disposal, while statistically significant, is not likely to have consequential health benefit. To achieve open defecation free communities, sanitation interventions will need to develop behaviour change approaches to explicitly target safe disposal behaviours. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5916378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59163782018-04-30 The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India Freeman, Matthew C. Majorin, Fiona Boisson, Sophie Routray, Parimita Torondel, Belen Clasen, Thomas Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Article BACKGROUND: Unsafe disposal of child faeces is persistent and may lead to considerable impact on the health of young children. Research is limited on the impact of sanitation or hygiene interventions to improve child faeces disposal practices. METHODS: In the context of a randomised controlled trial to assess the health impact of a programme in Odisha, India, to promote rural sanitation under the Government of India's Total Sanitation Campaign, we explored whether the intervention affected the safe disposal of faeces of children under-5 years of age. RESULTS: At baseline, 1.1% of households practised ‘safe’ disposal of child faeces, either disposing it in a toilet or by burial. The intervention increased safe disposal of child faeces to 10.4% in intervention households, compared to 3.1% in the control households (RR 3.34; 95% CI 1.99–5.59). This increase in safe disposal is attributable to increases in latrine presence in the intervention communities; the intervention did not change safe disposal practices above and beyond the increase in latrine coverage. CONCLUSIONS: The very modest increase in safe disposal, while statistically significant, is not likely to have consequential health benefit. To achieve open defecation free communities, sanitation interventions will need to develop behaviour change approaches to explicitly target safe disposal behaviours. Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2016-07 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5916378/ /pubmed/27496512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trw043 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Freeman, Matthew C. Majorin, Fiona Boisson, Sophie Routray, Parimita Torondel, Belen Clasen, Thomas The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India |
title | The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India |
title_full | The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India |
title_fullStr | The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India |
title_short | The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India |
title_sort | impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in odisha, india |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27496512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trw043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freemanmatthewc theimpactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia AT majorinfiona theimpactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia AT boissonsophie theimpactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia AT routrayparimita theimpactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia AT torondelbelen theimpactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia AT clasenthomas theimpactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia AT freemanmatthewc impactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia AT majorinfiona impactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia AT boissonsophie impactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia AT routrayparimita impactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia AT torondelbelen impactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia AT clasenthomas impactofaruralsanitationprogrammeonsafedisposalofchildfaecesaclusterrandomisedtrialinodishaindia |