Cargando…

Development and characterization of an anti-rituximab monoclonal antibody panel

During the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and other therapeutic proteins, immunogenicity, in particular the induction of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), is an important concern, and thus immunogenicity assessment is a requirement for their approval. Establishment of appropriate methods for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tada, Minoru, Suzuki, Takuo, Ishii-Watabe, Akiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29309213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2018.1424610
_version_ 1783317031833042944
author Tada, Minoru
Suzuki, Takuo
Ishii-Watabe, Akiko
author_facet Tada, Minoru
Suzuki, Takuo
Ishii-Watabe, Akiko
author_sort Tada, Minoru
collection PubMed
description During the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and other therapeutic proteins, immunogenicity, in particular the induction of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), is an important concern, and thus immunogenicity assessment is a requirement for their approval. Establishment of appropriate methods for detecting and characterizing ADAs is necessary for immunogenicity assessment, but the lack of commonly available reference standards makes it difficult to compare and evaluate the methods. It is also difficult to compare the data with those obtained by other methods or facilities without reference standards. Here, we developed a panel of ADAs against anti-CD20 rituximab (Rituxan®, MabThera®); the panel consisted of eight clones of recombinant human-rat chimeric mAbs that target rituximab. The anti-rituximab mAbs showed different binding properties (specificity, epitope and affinity), and different neutralization potencies for CD20 binding, complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The molecular size of the immune complex consisting of rituximab and the anti-rituximab mAb differed among the clones, and was well correlated with their level of Fcγ-receptor activation. These results suggest that the ADAs chosen for the newly developed panel are suitable surrogates for human ADAs, which exhibit different potential to affect the efficacy and safety of rituximab. Next, we used this panel to compare several ADA-detecting assays and revealed that the assays had different abilities to detect the ADAs with different binding characteristics. We conclude that our panel of ADAs against rituximab will be useful for the future development and characterization of assays for immunogenicity assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5916554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59165542018-04-27 Development and characterization of an anti-rituximab monoclonal antibody panel Tada, Minoru Suzuki, Takuo Ishii-Watabe, Akiko MAbs Report During the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and other therapeutic proteins, immunogenicity, in particular the induction of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), is an important concern, and thus immunogenicity assessment is a requirement for their approval. Establishment of appropriate methods for detecting and characterizing ADAs is necessary for immunogenicity assessment, but the lack of commonly available reference standards makes it difficult to compare and evaluate the methods. It is also difficult to compare the data with those obtained by other methods or facilities without reference standards. Here, we developed a panel of ADAs against anti-CD20 rituximab (Rituxan®, MabThera®); the panel consisted of eight clones of recombinant human-rat chimeric mAbs that target rituximab. The anti-rituximab mAbs showed different binding properties (specificity, epitope and affinity), and different neutralization potencies for CD20 binding, complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The molecular size of the immune complex consisting of rituximab and the anti-rituximab mAb differed among the clones, and was well correlated with their level of Fcγ-receptor activation. These results suggest that the ADAs chosen for the newly developed panel are suitable surrogates for human ADAs, which exhibit different potential to affect the efficacy and safety of rituximab. Next, we used this panel to compare several ADA-detecting assays and revealed that the assays had different abilities to detect the ADAs with different binding characteristics. We conclude that our panel of ADAs against rituximab will be useful for the future development and characterization of assays for immunogenicity assessment. Taylor & Francis 2018-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5916554/ /pubmed/29309213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2018.1424610 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Report
Tada, Minoru
Suzuki, Takuo
Ishii-Watabe, Akiko
Development and characterization of an anti-rituximab monoclonal antibody panel
title Development and characterization of an anti-rituximab monoclonal antibody panel
title_full Development and characterization of an anti-rituximab monoclonal antibody panel
title_fullStr Development and characterization of an anti-rituximab monoclonal antibody panel
title_full_unstemmed Development and characterization of an anti-rituximab monoclonal antibody panel
title_short Development and characterization of an anti-rituximab monoclonal antibody panel
title_sort development and characterization of an anti-rituximab monoclonal antibody panel
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29309213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2018.1424610
work_keys_str_mv AT tadaminoru developmentandcharacterizationofanantirituximabmonoclonalantibodypanel
AT suzukitakuo developmentandcharacterizationofanantirituximabmonoclonalantibodypanel
AT ishiiwatabeakiko developmentandcharacterizationofanantirituximabmonoclonalantibodypanel