Cargando…
The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation
BACKGROUND: Acute malnutrition is currently divided into severe (SAM) and moderate (MAM) based on level of wasting. SAM and MAM currently have separate treatment protocols and products, managed by separate international agencies. For SAM, the dose of treatment is allocated by the child’s weight. A c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29690899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7 |
_version_ | 1783317068779618304 |
---|---|
author | Lelijveld, Natasha Bailey, Jeanette Mayberry, Amy Trenouth, Lani N’Diaye, Dieynaba S. Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan Puett, Chloe |
author_facet | Lelijveld, Natasha Bailey, Jeanette Mayberry, Amy Trenouth, Lani N’Diaye, Dieynaba S. Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan Puett, Chloe |
author_sort | Lelijveld, Natasha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acute malnutrition is currently divided into severe (SAM) and moderate (MAM) based on level of wasting. SAM and MAM currently have separate treatment protocols and products, managed by separate international agencies. For SAM, the dose of treatment is allocated by the child’s weight. A combined and simplified protocol for SAM and MAM, with a standardised dose of ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF), is being trialled for non-inferior recovery rates and may be more cost-effective than the current standard protocols for treating SAM and MAM. METHOD: This is the protocol for the economic evaluation of the ComPAS trial, a cluster-randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial that compares a novel combined protocol for treating uncomplicated acute malnutrition compared to the current standard protocol in South Sudan and Kenya. We will calculate the total economic costs of both protocols from a societal perspective, using accounting data, interviews and survey questionnaires. The incremental cost of implementing the combined protocol will be estimated, and all costs and outcomes will be presented as a cost-consequence analysis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated for primary and secondary outcome, if statistically significant. DISCUSSION: We hypothesise that implementing the combined protocol will be cost-effective due to streamlined logistics at clinic level, reduced length of treatment, especially for MAM, and reduced dosages of RUTF. The findings of this economic evaluation will be important for policymakers, especially given the hypothesised non-inferiority of the main health outcomes. The publication of this protocol aims to improve rigour of conduct and transparency of data collection and analysis. It is also intended to promote inclusion of economic evaluation in other nutrition intervention studies, especially for MAM, and improve comparability with other studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 30393230, date: 16/03/2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5916722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59167222018-04-30 The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation Lelijveld, Natasha Bailey, Jeanette Mayberry, Amy Trenouth, Lani N’Diaye, Dieynaba S. Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan Puett, Chloe Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Acute malnutrition is currently divided into severe (SAM) and moderate (MAM) based on level of wasting. SAM and MAM currently have separate treatment protocols and products, managed by separate international agencies. For SAM, the dose of treatment is allocated by the child’s weight. A combined and simplified protocol for SAM and MAM, with a standardised dose of ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF), is being trialled for non-inferior recovery rates and may be more cost-effective than the current standard protocols for treating SAM and MAM. METHOD: This is the protocol for the economic evaluation of the ComPAS trial, a cluster-randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial that compares a novel combined protocol for treating uncomplicated acute malnutrition compared to the current standard protocol in South Sudan and Kenya. We will calculate the total economic costs of both protocols from a societal perspective, using accounting data, interviews and survey questionnaires. The incremental cost of implementing the combined protocol will be estimated, and all costs and outcomes will be presented as a cost-consequence analysis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated for primary and secondary outcome, if statistically significant. DISCUSSION: We hypothesise that implementing the combined protocol will be cost-effective due to streamlined logistics at clinic level, reduced length of treatment, especially for MAM, and reduced dosages of RUTF. The findings of this economic evaluation will be important for policymakers, especially given the hypothesised non-inferiority of the main health outcomes. The publication of this protocol aims to improve rigour of conduct and transparency of data collection and analysis. It is also intended to promote inclusion of economic evaluation in other nutrition intervention studies, especially for MAM, and improve comparability with other studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 30393230, date: 16/03/2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5916722/ /pubmed/29690899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Lelijveld, Natasha Bailey, Jeanette Mayberry, Amy Trenouth, Lani N’Diaye, Dieynaba S. Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan Puett, Chloe The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation |
title | The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation |
title_full | The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation |
title_fullStr | The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation |
title_short | The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation |
title_sort | "compas trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29690899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lelijveldnatasha thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT baileyjeanette thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT mayberryamy thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT trenouthlani thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT ndiayedieynabas thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT haghparastbidgolihassan thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT puettchloe thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT lelijveldnatasha compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT baileyjeanette compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT mayberryamy compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT trenouthlani compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT ndiayedieynabas compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT haghparastbidgolihassan compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation AT puettchloe compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation |