Cargando…

The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation

BACKGROUND: Acute malnutrition is currently divided into severe (SAM) and moderate (MAM) based on level of wasting. SAM and MAM currently have separate treatment protocols and products, managed by separate international agencies. For SAM, the dose of treatment is allocated by the child’s weight. A c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lelijveld, Natasha, Bailey, Jeanette, Mayberry, Amy, Trenouth, Lani, N’Diaye, Dieynaba S., Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan, Puett, Chloe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29690899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7
_version_ 1783317068779618304
author Lelijveld, Natasha
Bailey, Jeanette
Mayberry, Amy
Trenouth, Lani
N’Diaye, Dieynaba S.
Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan
Puett, Chloe
author_facet Lelijveld, Natasha
Bailey, Jeanette
Mayberry, Amy
Trenouth, Lani
N’Diaye, Dieynaba S.
Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan
Puett, Chloe
author_sort Lelijveld, Natasha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute malnutrition is currently divided into severe (SAM) and moderate (MAM) based on level of wasting. SAM and MAM currently have separate treatment protocols and products, managed by separate international agencies. For SAM, the dose of treatment is allocated by the child’s weight. A combined and simplified protocol for SAM and MAM, with a standardised dose of ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF), is being trialled for non-inferior recovery rates and may be more cost-effective than the current standard protocols for treating SAM and MAM. METHOD: This is the protocol for the economic evaluation of the ComPAS trial, a cluster-randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial that compares a novel combined protocol for treating uncomplicated acute malnutrition compared to the current standard protocol in South Sudan and Kenya. We will calculate the total economic costs of both protocols from a societal perspective, using accounting data, interviews and survey questionnaires. The incremental cost of implementing the combined protocol will be estimated, and all costs and outcomes will be presented as a cost-consequence analysis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated for primary and secondary outcome, if statistically significant. DISCUSSION: We hypothesise that implementing the combined protocol will be cost-effective due to streamlined logistics at clinic level, reduced length of treatment, especially for MAM, and reduced dosages of RUTF. The findings of this economic evaluation will be important for policymakers, especially given the hypothesised non-inferiority of the main health outcomes. The publication of this protocol aims to improve rigour of conduct and transparency of data collection and analysis. It is also intended to promote inclusion of economic evaluation in other nutrition intervention studies, especially for MAM, and improve comparability with other studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 30393230, date: 16/03/2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5916722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59167222018-04-30 The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation Lelijveld, Natasha Bailey, Jeanette Mayberry, Amy Trenouth, Lani N’Diaye, Dieynaba S. Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan Puett, Chloe Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Acute malnutrition is currently divided into severe (SAM) and moderate (MAM) based on level of wasting. SAM and MAM currently have separate treatment protocols and products, managed by separate international agencies. For SAM, the dose of treatment is allocated by the child’s weight. A combined and simplified protocol for SAM and MAM, with a standardised dose of ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF), is being trialled for non-inferior recovery rates and may be more cost-effective than the current standard protocols for treating SAM and MAM. METHOD: This is the protocol for the economic evaluation of the ComPAS trial, a cluster-randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial that compares a novel combined protocol for treating uncomplicated acute malnutrition compared to the current standard protocol in South Sudan and Kenya. We will calculate the total economic costs of both protocols from a societal perspective, using accounting data, interviews and survey questionnaires. The incremental cost of implementing the combined protocol will be estimated, and all costs and outcomes will be presented as a cost-consequence analysis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated for primary and secondary outcome, if statistically significant. DISCUSSION: We hypothesise that implementing the combined protocol will be cost-effective due to streamlined logistics at clinic level, reduced length of treatment, especially for MAM, and reduced dosages of RUTF. The findings of this economic evaluation will be important for policymakers, especially given the hypothesised non-inferiority of the main health outcomes. The publication of this protocol aims to improve rigour of conduct and transparency of data collection and analysis. It is also intended to promote inclusion of economic evaluation in other nutrition intervention studies, especially for MAM, and improve comparability with other studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 30393230, date: 16/03/2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5916722/ /pubmed/29690899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lelijveld, Natasha
Bailey, Jeanette
Mayberry, Amy
Trenouth, Lani
N’Diaye, Dieynaba S.
Haghparast-Bidgoli, Hassan
Puett, Chloe
The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation
title The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation
title_full The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation
title_fullStr The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation
title_short The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation
title_sort "compas trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29690899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lelijveldnatasha thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT baileyjeanette thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT mayberryamy thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT trenouthlani thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT ndiayedieynabas thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT haghparastbidgolihassan thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT puettchloe thecompastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT lelijveldnatasha compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT baileyjeanette compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT mayberryamy compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT trenouthlani compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT ndiayedieynabas compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT haghparastbidgolihassan compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation
AT puettchloe compastrialcombinedtreatmentmodelforacutemalnutritionstudyprotocolfortheeconomicevaluation