Cargando…
Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship
BACKGROUND: Previous research shows that many authors of Cochrane overviews were also involved in some of the included systematic reviews (SRs). This type of dual (co-)authorship (DCA) may be a conflict of interest and a potential source of bias. Our objectives were to (1) additionally investigate D...
Autores principales: | Pieper, Dawid, Waltering, Andreas, Holstiege, Jakob, Büchter, Roland Brian |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29690911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0722-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012–2016: protocol for a systematic review
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance
por: Büchter, Roland Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Büchter, Roland Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Are patients willing to accept longer travel times to decrease their risk associated with surgical procedures? A systematic review
por: Bühn, Stefanie, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Assessing transferability in systematic reviews of health economic evaluations – a review of methodological guidance
por: Weise, Alina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)