Cargando…
The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare three polishing systems on the surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 disk shaped specimens (10 mm diameter, 3 mm thickness) were fabricated from monolithic zirconia blocks. 20 speci...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.132 |
_version_ | 1783317130128654336 |
---|---|
author | Caglar, Ipek Ates, Sabit Melih Yesil Duymus, Zeynep |
author_facet | Caglar, Ipek Ates, Sabit Melih Yesil Duymus, Zeynep |
author_sort | Caglar, Ipek |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare three polishing systems on the surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 disk shaped specimens (10 mm diameter, 3 mm thickness) were fabricated from monolithic zirconia blocks. 20 specimens were left as a control group and remaining specimens were grinded by diamond bur to simulate the occlusal adjustments. Grinded specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups: group G (no polishing), group M (Meisinger, zirconia polishing kit), group E (EVE Diacera, zirconia polishing kit), and group P (EVE Diapol, porcelain polishing kit). Surface roughness was measured with profilometer and surface topography was observed with SEM. XRD analysis was performed to investigate the phase transformation. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests at a significance level of P=.05. RESULTS: All polishing groups showed a smoother surface than group G. Among 3 polishing systems, group M and group E exhibited a smoother surface than the group P. However, no significant differences were observed between group M and group E (P>.05). Grinding and polishing did not cause phase transformations in zirconia specimens. CONCLUSION: Zirconia polishing systems created a smoother surface on zirconia than the porcelain polishing system. Phase transformation did not occur during the polishing procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5917105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59171052018-04-30 The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia Caglar, Ipek Ates, Sabit Melih Yesil Duymus, Zeynep J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare three polishing systems on the surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 disk shaped specimens (10 mm diameter, 3 mm thickness) were fabricated from monolithic zirconia blocks. 20 specimens were left as a control group and remaining specimens were grinded by diamond bur to simulate the occlusal adjustments. Grinded specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups: group G (no polishing), group M (Meisinger, zirconia polishing kit), group E (EVE Diacera, zirconia polishing kit), and group P (EVE Diapol, porcelain polishing kit). Surface roughness was measured with profilometer and surface topography was observed with SEM. XRD analysis was performed to investigate the phase transformation. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests at a significance level of P=.05. RESULTS: All polishing groups showed a smoother surface than group G. Among 3 polishing systems, group M and group E exhibited a smoother surface than the group P. However, no significant differences were observed between group M and group E (P>.05). Grinding and polishing did not cause phase transformations in zirconia specimens. CONCLUSION: Zirconia polishing systems created a smoother surface on zirconia than the porcelain polishing system. Phase transformation did not occur during the polishing procedure. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2018-04 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5917105/ /pubmed/29713434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.132 Text en © 2018 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Caglar, Ipek Ates, Sabit Melih Yesil Duymus, Zeynep The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia |
title | The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia |
title_full | The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia |
title_fullStr | The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia |
title_short | The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia |
title_sort | effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caglaripek theeffectofvariouspolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandphasetransformationofmonolithiczirconia AT atessabitmelih theeffectofvariouspolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandphasetransformationofmonolithiczirconia AT yesilduymuszeynep theeffectofvariouspolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandphasetransformationofmonolithiczirconia AT caglaripek effectofvariouspolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandphasetransformationofmonolithiczirconia AT atessabitmelih effectofvariouspolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandphasetransformationofmonolithiczirconia AT yesilduymuszeynep effectofvariouspolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandphasetransformationofmonolithiczirconia |