Cargando…

The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare three polishing systems on the surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 disk shaped specimens (10 mm diameter, 3 mm thickness) were fabricated from monolithic zirconia blocks. 20 speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caglar, Ipek, Ates, Sabit Melih, Yesil Duymus, Zeynep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713434
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.132
_version_ 1783317130128654336
author Caglar, Ipek
Ates, Sabit Melih
Yesil Duymus, Zeynep
author_facet Caglar, Ipek
Ates, Sabit Melih
Yesil Duymus, Zeynep
author_sort Caglar, Ipek
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare three polishing systems on the surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 disk shaped specimens (10 mm diameter, 3 mm thickness) were fabricated from monolithic zirconia blocks. 20 specimens were left as a control group and remaining specimens were grinded by diamond bur to simulate the occlusal adjustments. Grinded specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups: group G (no polishing), group M (Meisinger, zirconia polishing kit), group E (EVE Diacera, zirconia polishing kit), and group P (EVE Diapol, porcelain polishing kit). Surface roughness was measured with profilometer and surface topography was observed with SEM. XRD analysis was performed to investigate the phase transformation. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests at a significance level of P=.05. RESULTS: All polishing groups showed a smoother surface than group G. Among 3 polishing systems, group M and group E exhibited a smoother surface than the group P. However, no significant differences were observed between group M and group E (P>.05). Grinding and polishing did not cause phase transformations in zirconia specimens. CONCLUSION: Zirconia polishing systems created a smoother surface on zirconia than the porcelain polishing system. Phase transformation did not occur during the polishing procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5917105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59171052018-04-30 The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia Caglar, Ipek Ates, Sabit Melih Yesil Duymus, Zeynep J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare three polishing systems on the surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 disk shaped specimens (10 mm diameter, 3 mm thickness) were fabricated from monolithic zirconia blocks. 20 specimens were left as a control group and remaining specimens were grinded by diamond bur to simulate the occlusal adjustments. Grinded specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups: group G (no polishing), group M (Meisinger, zirconia polishing kit), group E (EVE Diacera, zirconia polishing kit), and group P (EVE Diapol, porcelain polishing kit). Surface roughness was measured with profilometer and surface topography was observed with SEM. XRD analysis was performed to investigate the phase transformation. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests at a significance level of P=.05. RESULTS: All polishing groups showed a smoother surface than group G. Among 3 polishing systems, group M and group E exhibited a smoother surface than the group P. However, no significant differences were observed between group M and group E (P>.05). Grinding and polishing did not cause phase transformations in zirconia specimens. CONCLUSION: Zirconia polishing systems created a smoother surface on zirconia than the porcelain polishing system. Phase transformation did not occur during the polishing procedure. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2018-04 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5917105/ /pubmed/29713434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.132 Text en © 2018 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Caglar, Ipek
Ates, Sabit Melih
Yesil Duymus, Zeynep
The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia
title The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia
title_full The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia
title_fullStr The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia
title_full_unstemmed The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia
title_short The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia
title_sort effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713434
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.132
work_keys_str_mv AT caglaripek theeffectofvariouspolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandphasetransformationofmonolithiczirconia
AT atessabitmelih theeffectofvariouspolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandphasetransformationofmonolithiczirconia
AT yesilduymuszeynep theeffectofvariouspolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandphasetransformationofmonolithiczirconia
AT caglaripek effectofvariouspolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandphasetransformationofmonolithiczirconia
AT atessabitmelih effectofvariouspolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandphasetransformationofmonolithiczirconia
AT yesilduymuszeynep effectofvariouspolishingsystemsonsurfaceroughnessandphasetransformationofmonolithiczirconia