Cargando…
Double Anonymity and the Peer Review Process
The process of peer review for submissions to scientific journals is a well-established and widely used procedure. Review by one's peers is a well-recognised and long-standing method of appraisal. Throughout all branches of science, medicine, humanities, art, literature, politics, sport, and in...
Autor principal: | Brown, Richard J.C. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29861689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.228 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Privacy and Anonymity in the Information Society – Challenges for the European Union
por: Tsoukalas, Ioannis A., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
The influence of anonymous peers on prosocial behavior
por: Park, Soowon, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
From Anonymous to Public Enemy: How Does a Mosquito Become a Feared Arbovirus Vector?
por: Fontenille, Didier, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Two changes that may help to improve NIH peer review
por: Aslin, Richard N.
Publicado: (2022) -
Overcoming the gender bias in ecology and evolution: is the double-anonymized peer review an effective pathway over time?
por: Cássia-Silva, Cibele, et al.
Publicado: (2023)