Cargando…

Tips on Establishing a Robotics Program in an Academic Setting

Over the past 5 years, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has gone from being a novelty to an accepted approach for intra-abdominal and pelvic surgery. Driving this trend has been the large number of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies performed throughout the U.S. Nearly a quarter of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Steers, William D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17619728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.393
_version_ 1783317136809132032
author Steers, William D.
author_facet Steers, William D.
author_sort Steers, William D.
collection PubMed
description Over the past 5 years, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has gone from being a novelty to an accepted approach for intra-abdominal and pelvic surgery. Driving this trend has been the large number of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies performed throughout the U.S. Nearly a quarter of the prostatectomies done for prostate cancer in the U.S. in 2006 will use robotic assistance, yet reports fail to confirm cost effectiveness. The most important predictor of a successful program is a champion at the institution. Studies have demonstrated safety and immediate benefits with regard to reduced surgical morbidity such as pain, loss of work, quality of life, and blood loss for a variety of surgeries patients. Specific to prostatectomy for cancer, long-term data on biochemical (PSA) failures and cancer cures, as well as validated secondary outcomes for continence and potency, are still unavailable. Benefits accrue for the surgeon as well with improved ergonomics and potential extension of a surgical career. Yet, enthusiasm for robotics must be tempered by this lack of data and economic limitations. However, if a thoughtful and thorough process in initiating a robotic program is undertaken, the risks to the institution can be minimized. With proper training, the risk to the patient is reduced and with due diligence with regard to market and operative resources, the risk to the surgeon can be eliminated. This report reviews the steps to assess, plan, initiate, and maintain a robotics program at an academic institution with the hope that other programs can benefit from lessons acquired by early adopters of this expensive technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5917135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59171352018-06-03 Tips on Establishing a Robotics Program in an Academic Setting Steers, William D. ScientificWorldJournal Review Article Over the past 5 years, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has gone from being a novelty to an accepted approach for intra-abdominal and pelvic surgery. Driving this trend has been the large number of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies performed throughout the U.S. Nearly a quarter of the prostatectomies done for prostate cancer in the U.S. in 2006 will use robotic assistance, yet reports fail to confirm cost effectiveness. The most important predictor of a successful program is a champion at the institution. Studies have demonstrated safety and immediate benefits with regard to reduced surgical morbidity such as pain, loss of work, quality of life, and blood loss for a variety of surgeries patients. Specific to prostatectomy for cancer, long-term data on biochemical (PSA) failures and cancer cures, as well as validated secondary outcomes for continence and potency, are still unavailable. Benefits accrue for the surgeon as well with improved ergonomics and potential extension of a surgical career. Yet, enthusiasm for robotics must be tempered by this lack of data and economic limitations. However, if a thoughtful and thorough process in initiating a robotic program is undertaken, the risks to the institution can be minimized. With proper training, the risk to the patient is reduced and with due diligence with regard to market and operative resources, the risk to the surgeon can be eliminated. This report reviews the steps to assess, plan, initiate, and maintain a robotics program at an academic institution with the hope that other programs can benefit from lessons acquired by early adopters of this expensive technology. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2006-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5917135/ /pubmed/17619728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.393 Text en Copyright © 2006 William D. Steers. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Steers, William D.
Tips on Establishing a Robotics Program in an Academic Setting
title Tips on Establishing a Robotics Program in an Academic Setting
title_full Tips on Establishing a Robotics Program in an Academic Setting
title_fullStr Tips on Establishing a Robotics Program in an Academic Setting
title_full_unstemmed Tips on Establishing a Robotics Program in an Academic Setting
title_short Tips on Establishing a Robotics Program in an Academic Setting
title_sort tips on establishing a robotics program in an academic setting
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17619728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.393
work_keys_str_mv AT steerswilliamd tipsonestablishingaroboticsprograminanacademicsetting