Cargando…

Fracture Penis: An Analysis of 26 Cases

The aim of this study was to review the pattern of penile fracture occurrence, its clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcome at our center. A retrospective analysis of 26 patients with penile fractures treated at our hospital from January 1997 to January 2005 was carried out. We note...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pandyan, G.V.Soundra, Zaharani, Ahmed Bakeet, Al Rashid, Mohammed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17619699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.363
_version_ 1783317194740858880
author Pandyan, G.V.Soundra
Zaharani, Ahmed Bakeet
Al Rashid, Mohammed
author_facet Pandyan, G.V.Soundra
Zaharani, Ahmed Bakeet
Al Rashid, Mohammed
author_sort Pandyan, G.V.Soundra
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to review the pattern of penile fracture occurrence, its clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcome at our center. A retrospective analysis of 26 patients with penile fractures treated at our hospital from January 1997 to January 2005 was carried out. We noted an incidence of 3.5 cases per year, occurring more commonly in unmarried men. Of our study group, 28 episodes of penile fractures occurred in 26 patients. Hospital presentation after trauma varied from 2 h to 21 days. Masturbation was the main initiating causative factor and penile hematoma was the most common clinical finding. Nearly 81% noticed the characteristic click prior to the fracture. Clinical diagnosis was adequate in a majority of the cases. Midshaft fractures with right-sided laterality were more frequent in this series. The tear size ranged from 0.5—2.5 cm with a mean of 1.1 cm. All cases, but one, were treated by surgical repair using absorbable sutures. Out of three cases treated conservatively, two failed to respond and had to be treated surgically. False fracture with dorsal vein tear was present in two cases. Involvement of bilateral corpora was seen in one patient. Infection was the most common early complication, while pain with deviation was the late complication. In our experience, clinical findings are adequate enough to diagnose fracture penis in a majority of cases. Surgical exploration with repair of the tear is recommended both in early and delayed presentations. There was no noticeable relationship to the time of initial presentation or with the size and site of tear to the final outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5917368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59173682018-06-03 Fracture Penis: An Analysis of 26 Cases Pandyan, G.V.Soundra Zaharani, Ahmed Bakeet Al Rashid, Mohammed ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The aim of this study was to review the pattern of penile fracture occurrence, its clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcome at our center. A retrospective analysis of 26 patients with penile fractures treated at our hospital from January 1997 to January 2005 was carried out. We noted an incidence of 3.5 cases per year, occurring more commonly in unmarried men. Of our study group, 28 episodes of penile fractures occurred in 26 patients. Hospital presentation after trauma varied from 2 h to 21 days. Masturbation was the main initiating causative factor and penile hematoma was the most common clinical finding. Nearly 81% noticed the characteristic click prior to the fracture. Clinical diagnosis was adequate in a majority of the cases. Midshaft fractures with right-sided laterality were more frequent in this series. The tear size ranged from 0.5—2.5 cm with a mean of 1.1 cm. All cases, but one, were treated by surgical repair using absorbable sutures. Out of three cases treated conservatively, two failed to respond and had to be treated surgically. False fracture with dorsal vein tear was present in two cases. Involvement of bilateral corpora was seen in one patient. Infection was the most common early complication, while pain with deviation was the late complication. In our experience, clinical findings are adequate enough to diagnose fracture penis in a majority of cases. Surgical exploration with repair of the tear is recommended both in early and delayed presentations. There was no noticeable relationship to the time of initial presentation or with the size and site of tear to the final outcome. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2006-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5917368/ /pubmed/17619699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.363 Text en Copyright © 2006 G.V.Soundra Pandyan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pandyan, G.V.Soundra
Zaharani, Ahmed Bakeet
Al Rashid, Mohammed
Fracture Penis: An Analysis of 26 Cases
title Fracture Penis: An Analysis of 26 Cases
title_full Fracture Penis: An Analysis of 26 Cases
title_fullStr Fracture Penis: An Analysis of 26 Cases
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Penis: An Analysis of 26 Cases
title_short Fracture Penis: An Analysis of 26 Cases
title_sort fracture penis: an analysis of 26 cases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17619699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.363
work_keys_str_mv AT pandyangvsoundra fracturepenisananalysisof26cases
AT zaharaniahmedbakeet fracturepenisananalysisof26cases
AT alrashidmohammed fracturepenisananalysisof26cases