Cargando…

A neurocomputational account of reward and novelty processing and effects of psychostimulants in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Computational models of reinforcement learning have helped dissect discrete components of reward-related function and characterize neurocognitive deficits in psychiatric illnesses. Stimulus novelty biases decision-making, even when unrelated to choice outcome, acting as if possessing intrinsic rewar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sethi, Arjun, Voon, Valerie, Critchley, Hugo D, Cercignani, Mara, Harrison, Neil A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29547978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy048
_version_ 1783317284946706432
author Sethi, Arjun
Voon, Valerie
Critchley, Hugo D
Cercignani, Mara
Harrison, Neil A
author_facet Sethi, Arjun
Voon, Valerie
Critchley, Hugo D
Cercignani, Mara
Harrison, Neil A
author_sort Sethi, Arjun
collection PubMed
description Computational models of reinforcement learning have helped dissect discrete components of reward-related function and characterize neurocognitive deficits in psychiatric illnesses. Stimulus novelty biases decision-making, even when unrelated to choice outcome, acting as if possessing intrinsic reward value to guide decisions toward uncertain options. Heightened novelty seeking is characteristic of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, yet how this influences reward-related decision-making is computationally encoded, or is altered by stimulant medication, is currently uncertain. Here we used an established reinforcement-learning task to model effects of novelty on reward-related behaviour during functional MRI in 30 adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and 30 age-, sex- and IQ-matched control subjects. Each participant was tested on two separate occasions, once ON and once OFF stimulant medication. OFF medication, patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder showed significantly impaired task performance (P = 0.027), and greater selection of novel options (P = 0.004). Moreover, persistence in selecting novel options predicted impaired task performance (P = 0.025). These behavioural deficits were accompanied by a significantly lower learning rate (P = 0.011) and heightened novelty signalling within the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (family-wise error corrected P < 0.05). Compared to effects in controls, stimulant medication improved attention deficit hyperactivity disorder participants’ overall task performance (P = 0.011), increased reward-learning rates (P = 0.046) and enhanced their ability to differentiate optimal from non-optimal novel choices (P = 0.032). It also reduced substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area responses to novelty. Preliminary cross-sectional evidence additionally suggested an association between long-term stimulant treatment and a reduction in the rewarding value of novelty. These data suggest that aberrant substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area novelty processing plays an important role in the suboptimal reward-related decision-making characteristic of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Compared to effects in controls, abnormalities in novelty processing and reward-related learning were improved by stimulant medication, suggesting that they may be disorder-specific targets for the pharmacological management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5917772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59177722018-05-04 A neurocomputational account of reward and novelty processing and effects of psychostimulants in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Sethi, Arjun Voon, Valerie Critchley, Hugo D Cercignani, Mara Harrison, Neil A Brain Original Articles Computational models of reinforcement learning have helped dissect discrete components of reward-related function and characterize neurocognitive deficits in psychiatric illnesses. Stimulus novelty biases decision-making, even when unrelated to choice outcome, acting as if possessing intrinsic reward value to guide decisions toward uncertain options. Heightened novelty seeking is characteristic of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, yet how this influences reward-related decision-making is computationally encoded, or is altered by stimulant medication, is currently uncertain. Here we used an established reinforcement-learning task to model effects of novelty on reward-related behaviour during functional MRI in 30 adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and 30 age-, sex- and IQ-matched control subjects. Each participant was tested on two separate occasions, once ON and once OFF stimulant medication. OFF medication, patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder showed significantly impaired task performance (P = 0.027), and greater selection of novel options (P = 0.004). Moreover, persistence in selecting novel options predicted impaired task performance (P = 0.025). These behavioural deficits were accompanied by a significantly lower learning rate (P = 0.011) and heightened novelty signalling within the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (family-wise error corrected P < 0.05). Compared to effects in controls, stimulant medication improved attention deficit hyperactivity disorder participants’ overall task performance (P = 0.011), increased reward-learning rates (P = 0.046) and enhanced their ability to differentiate optimal from non-optimal novel choices (P = 0.032). It also reduced substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area responses to novelty. Preliminary cross-sectional evidence additionally suggested an association between long-term stimulant treatment and a reduction in the rewarding value of novelty. These data suggest that aberrant substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area novelty processing plays an important role in the suboptimal reward-related decision-making characteristic of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Compared to effects in controls, abnormalities in novelty processing and reward-related learning were improved by stimulant medication, suggesting that they may be disorder-specific targets for the pharmacological management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. Oxford University Press 2018-05 2018-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5917772/ /pubmed/29547978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy048 Text en © The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sethi, Arjun
Voon, Valerie
Critchley, Hugo D
Cercignani, Mara
Harrison, Neil A
A neurocomputational account of reward and novelty processing and effects of psychostimulants in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
title A neurocomputational account of reward and novelty processing and effects of psychostimulants in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
title_full A neurocomputational account of reward and novelty processing and effects of psychostimulants in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
title_fullStr A neurocomputational account of reward and novelty processing and effects of psychostimulants in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
title_full_unstemmed A neurocomputational account of reward and novelty processing and effects of psychostimulants in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
title_short A neurocomputational account of reward and novelty processing and effects of psychostimulants in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
title_sort neurocomputational account of reward and novelty processing and effects of psychostimulants in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29547978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy048
work_keys_str_mv AT sethiarjun aneurocomputationalaccountofrewardandnoveltyprocessingandeffectsofpsychostimulantsinattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT voonvalerie aneurocomputationalaccountofrewardandnoveltyprocessingandeffectsofpsychostimulantsinattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT critchleyhugod aneurocomputationalaccountofrewardandnoveltyprocessingandeffectsofpsychostimulantsinattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT cercignanimara aneurocomputationalaccountofrewardandnoveltyprocessingandeffectsofpsychostimulantsinattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT harrisonneila aneurocomputationalaccountofrewardandnoveltyprocessingandeffectsofpsychostimulantsinattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT sethiarjun neurocomputationalaccountofrewardandnoveltyprocessingandeffectsofpsychostimulantsinattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT voonvalerie neurocomputationalaccountofrewardandnoveltyprocessingandeffectsofpsychostimulantsinattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT critchleyhugod neurocomputationalaccountofrewardandnoveltyprocessingandeffectsofpsychostimulantsinattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT cercignanimara neurocomputationalaccountofrewardandnoveltyprocessingandeffectsofpsychostimulantsinattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT harrisonneila neurocomputationalaccountofrewardandnoveltyprocessingandeffectsofpsychostimulantsinattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder