Cargando…

Artificial limb representation in amputees

The human brain contains multiple hand-selective areas, in both the sensorimotor and visual systems. Could our brain repurpose neural resources, originally developed for supporting hand function, to represent and control artificial limbs? We studied individuals with congenital or acquired hand-loss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Heiligenberg, Fiona M Z, Orlov, Tanya, Macdonald, Scott N, Duff, Eugene P, Henderson Slater, David, Beckmann, Christian F, Johansen-Berg, Heidi, Culham, Jody C, Makin, Tamar R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29534154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy054
_version_ 1783317286119014400
author van den Heiligenberg, Fiona M Z
Orlov, Tanya
Macdonald, Scott N
Duff, Eugene P
Henderson Slater, David
Beckmann, Christian F
Johansen-Berg, Heidi
Culham, Jody C
Makin, Tamar R
author_facet van den Heiligenberg, Fiona M Z
Orlov, Tanya
Macdonald, Scott N
Duff, Eugene P
Henderson Slater, David
Beckmann, Christian F
Johansen-Berg, Heidi
Culham, Jody C
Makin, Tamar R
author_sort van den Heiligenberg, Fiona M Z
collection PubMed
description The human brain contains multiple hand-selective areas, in both the sensorimotor and visual systems. Could our brain repurpose neural resources, originally developed for supporting hand function, to represent and control artificial limbs? We studied individuals with congenital or acquired hand-loss (hereafter one-handers) using functional MRI. We show that the more one-handers use an artificial limb (prosthesis) in their everyday life, the stronger visual hand-selective areas in the lateral occipitotemporal cortex respond to prosthesis images. This was found even when one-handers were presented with images of active prostheses that share the functionality of the hand but not necessarily its visual features (e.g. a ‘hook’ prosthesis). Further, we show that daily prosthesis usage determines large-scale inter-network communication across hand-selective areas. This was demonstrated by increased resting state functional connectivity between visual and sensorimotor hand-selective areas, proportional to the intensiveness of everyday prosthesis usage. Further analysis revealed a 3-fold coupling between prosthesis activity, visuomotor connectivity and usage, suggesting a possible role for the motor system in shaping use-dependent representation in visual hand-selective areas, and/or vice versa. Moreover, able-bodied control participants who routinely observe prosthesis usage (albeit less intensively than the prosthesis users) showed significantly weaker associations between degree of prosthesis observation and visual cortex activity or connectivity. Together, our findings suggest that altered daily motor behaviour facilitates prosthesis-related visual processing and shapes communication across hand-selective areas. This neurophysiological substrate for prosthesis embodiment may inspire rehabilitation approaches to improve usage of existing substitutionary devices and aid implementation of future assistive and augmentative technologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5917779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59177792018-05-04 Artificial limb representation in amputees van den Heiligenberg, Fiona M Z Orlov, Tanya Macdonald, Scott N Duff, Eugene P Henderson Slater, David Beckmann, Christian F Johansen-Berg, Heidi Culham, Jody C Makin, Tamar R Brain Original Articles The human brain contains multiple hand-selective areas, in both the sensorimotor and visual systems. Could our brain repurpose neural resources, originally developed for supporting hand function, to represent and control artificial limbs? We studied individuals with congenital or acquired hand-loss (hereafter one-handers) using functional MRI. We show that the more one-handers use an artificial limb (prosthesis) in their everyday life, the stronger visual hand-selective areas in the lateral occipitotemporal cortex respond to prosthesis images. This was found even when one-handers were presented with images of active prostheses that share the functionality of the hand but not necessarily its visual features (e.g. a ‘hook’ prosthesis). Further, we show that daily prosthesis usage determines large-scale inter-network communication across hand-selective areas. This was demonstrated by increased resting state functional connectivity between visual and sensorimotor hand-selective areas, proportional to the intensiveness of everyday prosthesis usage. Further analysis revealed a 3-fold coupling between prosthesis activity, visuomotor connectivity and usage, suggesting a possible role for the motor system in shaping use-dependent representation in visual hand-selective areas, and/or vice versa. Moreover, able-bodied control participants who routinely observe prosthesis usage (albeit less intensively than the prosthesis users) showed significantly weaker associations between degree of prosthesis observation and visual cortex activity or connectivity. Together, our findings suggest that altered daily motor behaviour facilitates prosthesis-related visual processing and shapes communication across hand-selective areas. This neurophysiological substrate for prosthesis embodiment may inspire rehabilitation approaches to improve usage of existing substitutionary devices and aid implementation of future assistive and augmentative technologies. Oxford University Press 2018-05 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5917779/ /pubmed/29534154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy054 Text en © The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
van den Heiligenberg, Fiona M Z
Orlov, Tanya
Macdonald, Scott N
Duff, Eugene P
Henderson Slater, David
Beckmann, Christian F
Johansen-Berg, Heidi
Culham, Jody C
Makin, Tamar R
Artificial limb representation in amputees
title Artificial limb representation in amputees
title_full Artificial limb representation in amputees
title_fullStr Artificial limb representation in amputees
title_full_unstemmed Artificial limb representation in amputees
title_short Artificial limb representation in amputees
title_sort artificial limb representation in amputees
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29534154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy054
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenheiligenbergfionamz artificiallimbrepresentationinamputees
AT orlovtanya artificiallimbrepresentationinamputees
AT macdonaldscottn artificiallimbrepresentationinamputees
AT duffeugenep artificiallimbrepresentationinamputees
AT hendersonslaterdavid artificiallimbrepresentationinamputees
AT beckmannchristianf artificiallimbrepresentationinamputees
AT johansenbergheidi artificiallimbrepresentationinamputees
AT culhamjodyc artificiallimbrepresentationinamputees
AT makintamarr artificiallimbrepresentationinamputees