Cargando…

Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital

Strain differences in the expression of cytochrome P‐450 isoenzymes (P‐450s) during enhancement of hepatocarcinogenesis by 2‐acetylaminofluorene (2‐AAF) and phenobarbital (PB) were investigated immunohistochemically using monoclonal antibodies against phenobarbital (PB) (APF3) or 3‐methylcholanthren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asamoto, Makoto, Tsuda, Hiroyuki, Kato, Toshio, Ito, Nobuyuki, Masuko, Takashi, Hashimoto, Yoshiyuki, Nagase, Sumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1989
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2514165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1989.tb02256.x
_version_ 1783317315054469120
author Asamoto, Makoto
Tsuda, Hiroyuki
Kato, Toshio
Ito, Nobuyuki
Masuko, Takashi
Hashimoto, Yoshiyuki
Nagase, Sumi
author_facet Asamoto, Makoto
Tsuda, Hiroyuki
Kato, Toshio
Ito, Nobuyuki
Masuko, Takashi
Hashimoto, Yoshiyuki
Nagase, Sumi
author_sort Asamoto, Makoto
collection PubMed
description Strain differences in the expression of cytochrome P‐450 isoenzymes (P‐450s) during enhancement of hepatocarcinogenesis by 2‐acetylaminofluorene (2‐AAF) and phenobarbital (PB) were investigated immunohistochemically using monoclonal antibodies against phenobarbital (PB) (APF3) or 3‐methylcholanthrene (3‐MC) (APH8) inducible P‐450s. LEW, SD, WBN, F344, SHR, NAR, Wistar and ODS rats were studied, the first five strains proving to be less susceptible to 2‐AAF induction of APH8 while responding strongly to the promoting influence of this chemical, as reported previously. The other three strains, NAR, Wistar and ODS, demonstrated greater inducibility, this correlating with an observed resistance to promotion by 2‐AAF. PB administration was not associated with any strain difference in APF3 cytochrome P‐4SO inducibility except in the ODS rat, in which its effects were minimal. The results provide direct evidence that differential expression of cytochrome P‐450 species plays a major role in determining responsiveness to hepatocarcinogenesis‐promoting agents such as 2‐AAF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5917902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1989
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59179022018-05-11 Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Asamoto, Makoto Tsuda, Hiroyuki Kato, Toshio Ito, Nobuyuki Masuko, Takashi Hashimoto, Yoshiyuki Nagase, Sumi Jpn J Cancer Res Article Strain differences in the expression of cytochrome P‐450 isoenzymes (P‐450s) during enhancement of hepatocarcinogenesis by 2‐acetylaminofluorene (2‐AAF) and phenobarbital (PB) were investigated immunohistochemically using monoclonal antibodies against phenobarbital (PB) (APF3) or 3‐methylcholanthrene (3‐MC) (APH8) inducible P‐450s. LEW, SD, WBN, F344, SHR, NAR, Wistar and ODS rats were studied, the first five strains proving to be less susceptible to 2‐AAF induction of APH8 while responding strongly to the promoting influence of this chemical, as reported previously. The other three strains, NAR, Wistar and ODS, demonstrated greater inducibility, this correlating with an observed resistance to promotion by 2‐AAF. PB administration was not associated with any strain difference in APF3 cytochrome P‐4SO inducibility except in the ODS rat, in which its effects were minimal. The results provide direct evidence that differential expression of cytochrome P‐450 species plays a major role in determining responsiveness to hepatocarcinogenesis‐promoting agents such as 2‐AAF. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1989-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5917902/ /pubmed/2514165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1989.tb02256.x Text en
spellingShingle Article
Asamoto, Makoto
Tsuda, Hiroyuki
Kato, Toshio
Ito, Nobuyuki
Masuko, Takashi
Hashimoto, Yoshiyuki
Nagase, Sumi
Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital
title Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital
title_full Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital
title_fullStr Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital
title_full_unstemmed Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital
title_short Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital
title_sort strain differences in susceptibility to 2‐acetylaminofluorene and phenobarbital promotion of hepatocarcinogenesis: immunohistocliemical analysis of cytochrome p‐450 isozyme induction by 2‐acetylaminofluorene and phenobarbital
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2514165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1989.tb02256.x
work_keys_str_mv AT asamotomakoto straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital
AT tsudahiroyuki straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital
AT katotoshio straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital
AT itonobuyuki straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital
AT masukotakashi straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital
AT hashimotoyoshiyuki straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital
AT nagasesumi straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital