Cargando…
Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital
Strain differences in the expression of cytochrome P‐450 isoenzymes (P‐450s) during enhancement of hepatocarcinogenesis by 2‐acetylaminofluorene (2‐AAF) and phenobarbital (PB) were investigated immunohistochemically using monoclonal antibodies against phenobarbital (PB) (APF3) or 3‐methylcholanthren...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
1989
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2514165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1989.tb02256.x |
_version_ | 1783317315054469120 |
---|---|
author | Asamoto, Makoto Tsuda, Hiroyuki Kato, Toshio Ito, Nobuyuki Masuko, Takashi Hashimoto, Yoshiyuki Nagase, Sumi |
author_facet | Asamoto, Makoto Tsuda, Hiroyuki Kato, Toshio Ito, Nobuyuki Masuko, Takashi Hashimoto, Yoshiyuki Nagase, Sumi |
author_sort | Asamoto, Makoto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Strain differences in the expression of cytochrome P‐450 isoenzymes (P‐450s) during enhancement of hepatocarcinogenesis by 2‐acetylaminofluorene (2‐AAF) and phenobarbital (PB) were investigated immunohistochemically using monoclonal antibodies against phenobarbital (PB) (APF3) or 3‐methylcholanthrene (3‐MC) (APH8) inducible P‐450s. LEW, SD, WBN, F344, SHR, NAR, Wistar and ODS rats were studied, the first five strains proving to be less susceptible to 2‐AAF induction of APH8 while responding strongly to the promoting influence of this chemical, as reported previously. The other three strains, NAR, Wistar and ODS, demonstrated greater inducibility, this correlating with an observed resistance to promotion by 2‐AAF. PB administration was not associated with any strain difference in APF3 cytochrome P‐4SO inducibility except in the ODS rat, in which its effects were minimal. The results provide direct evidence that differential expression of cytochrome P‐450 species plays a major role in determining responsiveness to hepatocarcinogenesis‐promoting agents such as 2‐AAF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5917902 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1989 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59179022018-05-11 Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Asamoto, Makoto Tsuda, Hiroyuki Kato, Toshio Ito, Nobuyuki Masuko, Takashi Hashimoto, Yoshiyuki Nagase, Sumi Jpn J Cancer Res Article Strain differences in the expression of cytochrome P‐450 isoenzymes (P‐450s) during enhancement of hepatocarcinogenesis by 2‐acetylaminofluorene (2‐AAF) and phenobarbital (PB) were investigated immunohistochemically using monoclonal antibodies against phenobarbital (PB) (APF3) or 3‐methylcholanthrene (3‐MC) (APH8) inducible P‐450s. LEW, SD, WBN, F344, SHR, NAR, Wistar and ODS rats were studied, the first five strains proving to be less susceptible to 2‐AAF induction of APH8 while responding strongly to the promoting influence of this chemical, as reported previously. The other three strains, NAR, Wistar and ODS, demonstrated greater inducibility, this correlating with an observed resistance to promotion by 2‐AAF. PB administration was not associated with any strain difference in APF3 cytochrome P‐4SO inducibility except in the ODS rat, in which its effects were minimal. The results provide direct evidence that differential expression of cytochrome P‐450 species plays a major role in determining responsiveness to hepatocarcinogenesis‐promoting agents such as 2‐AAF. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1989-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5917902/ /pubmed/2514165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1989.tb02256.x Text en |
spellingShingle | Article Asamoto, Makoto Tsuda, Hiroyuki Kato, Toshio Ito, Nobuyuki Masuko, Takashi Hashimoto, Yoshiyuki Nagase, Sumi Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital |
title | Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital |
title_full | Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital |
title_fullStr | Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital |
title_full_unstemmed | Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital |
title_short | Strain Differences in Susceptibility to 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital Promotion of Hepatocarcinogenesis: Immunohistocliemical Analysis of Cytochrome P‐450 Isozyme Induction by 2‐Acetylaminofluorene and Phenobarbital |
title_sort | strain differences in susceptibility to 2‐acetylaminofluorene and phenobarbital promotion of hepatocarcinogenesis: immunohistocliemical analysis of cytochrome p‐450 isozyme induction by 2‐acetylaminofluorene and phenobarbital |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2514165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1989.tb02256.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asamotomakoto straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital AT tsudahiroyuki straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital AT katotoshio straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital AT itonobuyuki straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital AT masukotakashi straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital AT hashimotoyoshiyuki straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital AT nagasesumi straindifferencesinsusceptibilityto2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbitalpromotionofhepatocarcinogenesisimmunohistocliemicalanalysisofcytochromep450isozymeinductionby2acetylaminofluoreneandphenobarbital |