Cargando…
Multi‐drug Combination Therapy with Vincristine‐Melphalan‐Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone Was More Effective than Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone in Stage III Myeloma
A cooperative randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of multi‐drug combination chemotherapy (VMCP, vincristine‐melphalan‐cyclophosphamide‐prednisolone) with CP (cyclophosphamide‐prednisolone) for the treatment of multiple myeloma was performed. When the whole group of patients was ev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
1990
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2126002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02697.x |
_version_ | 1783317339762065408 |
---|---|
author | Shimizu, Kazuyuki Kamiya, Osamu Hamajima, Nobuyuki Mizuno, Harumitsu Kobayashi, Masahide Hirabayashi, Noriyuki Takeyama, Hideo Kato, Ryoichi Kawashima, Kohei Nitta, Masakazu Hotta, Tomomitsu Utsumi, Makoto Nagura, Eiichi |
author_facet | Shimizu, Kazuyuki Kamiya, Osamu Hamajima, Nobuyuki Mizuno, Harumitsu Kobayashi, Masahide Hirabayashi, Noriyuki Takeyama, Hideo Kato, Ryoichi Kawashima, Kohei Nitta, Masakazu Hotta, Tomomitsu Utsumi, Makoto Nagura, Eiichi |
author_sort | Shimizu, Kazuyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | A cooperative randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of multi‐drug combination chemotherapy (VMCP, vincristine‐melphalan‐cyclophosphamide‐prednisolone) with CP (cyclophosphamide‐prednisolone) for the treatment of multiple myeloma was performed. When the whole group of patients was evaluated, the choice of chemotherapy (VMCP or CP) was not a significant prognostic factor associated with response or survival by uni‐ or multivariate analysis, and the difference between the survival curves of the treatment groups was only marginally significant. However, when the analysis was confined to stage III patients, the choice of chemotherapy became a significant prognostic factor associated with both response rate and survival, and the statistical difference between survival curves was significant. Taking the disease characteristics of multiple myeloma into consideration, the better result obtained with multi‐drug combination chemotherapy in the treatment of stage III patients is consistent with other studies supporting the superiority of multi‐drug combination chemotherapy for patients with overt systemic disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5918012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1990 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59180122018-05-11 Multi‐drug Combination Therapy with Vincristine‐Melphalan‐Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone Was More Effective than Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone in Stage III Myeloma Shimizu, Kazuyuki Kamiya, Osamu Hamajima, Nobuyuki Mizuno, Harumitsu Kobayashi, Masahide Hirabayashi, Noriyuki Takeyama, Hideo Kato, Ryoichi Kawashima, Kohei Nitta, Masakazu Hotta, Tomomitsu Utsumi, Makoto Nagura, Eiichi Jpn J Cancer Res Article A cooperative randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of multi‐drug combination chemotherapy (VMCP, vincristine‐melphalan‐cyclophosphamide‐prednisolone) with CP (cyclophosphamide‐prednisolone) for the treatment of multiple myeloma was performed. When the whole group of patients was evaluated, the choice of chemotherapy (VMCP or CP) was not a significant prognostic factor associated with response or survival by uni‐ or multivariate analysis, and the difference between the survival curves of the treatment groups was only marginally significant. However, when the analysis was confined to stage III patients, the choice of chemotherapy became a significant prognostic factor associated with both response rate and survival, and the statistical difference between survival curves was significant. Taking the disease characteristics of multiple myeloma into consideration, the better result obtained with multi‐drug combination chemotherapy in the treatment of stage III patients is consistent with other studies supporting the superiority of multi‐drug combination chemotherapy for patients with overt systemic disease. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1990-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5918012/ /pubmed/2126002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02697.x Text en |
spellingShingle | Article Shimizu, Kazuyuki Kamiya, Osamu Hamajima, Nobuyuki Mizuno, Harumitsu Kobayashi, Masahide Hirabayashi, Noriyuki Takeyama, Hideo Kato, Ryoichi Kawashima, Kohei Nitta, Masakazu Hotta, Tomomitsu Utsumi, Makoto Nagura, Eiichi Multi‐drug Combination Therapy with Vincristine‐Melphalan‐Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone Was More Effective than Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone in Stage III Myeloma |
title | Multi‐drug Combination Therapy with Vincristine‐Melphalan‐Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone Was More Effective than Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone in Stage III Myeloma |
title_full | Multi‐drug Combination Therapy with Vincristine‐Melphalan‐Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone Was More Effective than Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone in Stage III Myeloma |
title_fullStr | Multi‐drug Combination Therapy with Vincristine‐Melphalan‐Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone Was More Effective than Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone in Stage III Myeloma |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi‐drug Combination Therapy with Vincristine‐Melphalan‐Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone Was More Effective than Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone in Stage III Myeloma |
title_short | Multi‐drug Combination Therapy with Vincristine‐Melphalan‐Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone Was More Effective than Cyclophosphamide‐Prednisolone in Stage III Myeloma |
title_sort | multi‐drug combination therapy with vincristine‐melphalan‐cyclophosphamide‐prednisolone was more effective than cyclophosphamide‐prednisolone in stage iii myeloma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2126002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02697.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shimizukazuyuki multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma AT kamiyaosamu multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma AT hamajimanobuyuki multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma AT mizunoharumitsu multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma AT kobayashimasahide multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma AT hirabayashinoriyuki multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma AT takeyamahideo multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma AT katoryoichi multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma AT kawashimakohei multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma AT nittamasakazu multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma AT hottatomomitsu multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma AT utsumimakoto multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma AT naguraeiichi multidrugcombinationtherapywithvincristinemelphalancyclophosphamideprednisolonewasmoreeffectivethancyclophosphamideprednisoloneinstageiiimyeloma |