Cargando…

Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy

We examined the modification of host T cells of tumor nodules by interferon (IFN) therapy in mouse models. The host cells were recovered from regressing tumor nodules of mice at Day 13 after intradermal tumor inoculation at Day 0 and administration of 5 × 10(5) U/mouse/day IFN at Day 6 to Day 10. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Honjo, Kaoru, Suhara, Yasuji, Kataoka, Tateshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1990
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2114393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02583.x
_version_ 1783317349182472192
author Honjo, Kaoru
Suhara, Yasuji
Kataoka, Tateshi
author_facet Honjo, Kaoru
Suhara, Yasuji
Kataoka, Tateshi
author_sort Honjo, Kaoru
collection PubMed
description We examined the modification of host T cells of tumor nodules by interferon (IFN) therapy in mouse models. The host cells were recovered from regressing tumor nodules of mice at Day 13 after intradermal tumor inoculation at Day 0 and administration of 5 × 10(5) U/mouse/day IFN at Day 6 to Day 10. These host cells neutralized in vivo Meth A growth in a dose‐dependent fashion. In vitro treatment of these cells with anti‐Thy 1.2 monoclonal antibody and rabbit sera as a source of complement abrogated their tumor‐neutralizing activity, but only partially, indicating that both T cells and non‐T cells were involved in tumor neutralization. The finding that host cells from regressing tumor nodules of either Meth A or Meth 1, an antigenically distinct fibrosarcoma, neutralized both Meth A and Meth 1 tumors without much selectivity was consistent with possible non‐T cell involvement. Most of these characteristics of host cells of regressing nodules of IFN‐administered mice were also noted with host cells of progressing nodules of placebo‐administered mice and there was no significant difference in neutralizing activity qualitatively or quantitatively between the two sources of host cells. There was no significant difference in host T and B cell numbers and compositions of regressing and progressing nodules either. These essentially negative findings raise the possibility, among others, that the primary target host cells to be modified by IFN were not T cells, although the therapeutic effect of IFN was dependent on the host T cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5918053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1990
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59180532018-05-11 Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy Honjo, Kaoru Suhara, Yasuji Kataoka, Tateshi Jpn J Cancer Res Article We examined the modification of host T cells of tumor nodules by interferon (IFN) therapy in mouse models. The host cells were recovered from regressing tumor nodules of mice at Day 13 after intradermal tumor inoculation at Day 0 and administration of 5 × 10(5) U/mouse/day IFN at Day 6 to Day 10. These host cells neutralized in vivo Meth A growth in a dose‐dependent fashion. In vitro treatment of these cells with anti‐Thy 1.2 monoclonal antibody and rabbit sera as a source of complement abrogated their tumor‐neutralizing activity, but only partially, indicating that both T cells and non‐T cells were involved in tumor neutralization. The finding that host cells from regressing tumor nodules of either Meth A or Meth 1, an antigenically distinct fibrosarcoma, neutralized both Meth A and Meth 1 tumors without much selectivity was consistent with possible non‐T cell involvement. Most of these characteristics of host cells of regressing nodules of IFN‐administered mice were also noted with host cells of progressing nodules of placebo‐administered mice and there was no significant difference in neutralizing activity qualitatively or quantitatively between the two sources of host cells. There was no significant difference in host T and B cell numbers and compositions of regressing and progressing nodules either. These essentially negative findings raise the possibility, among others, that the primary target host cells to be modified by IFN were not T cells, although the therapeutic effect of IFN was dependent on the host T cells. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1990-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5918053/ /pubmed/2114393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02583.x Text en
spellingShingle Article
Honjo, Kaoru
Suhara, Yasuji
Kataoka, Tateshi
Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy
title Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy
title_full Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy
title_fullStr Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy
title_short Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy
title_sort antitumor activity of host t and non‐t cells recovered from tumor nodules after interferon therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2114393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02583.x
work_keys_str_mv AT honjokaoru antitumoractivityofhosttandnontcellsrecoveredfromtumornodulesafterinterferontherapy
AT suharayasuji antitumoractivityofhosttandnontcellsrecoveredfromtumornodulesafterinterferontherapy
AT kataokatateshi antitumoractivityofhosttandnontcellsrecoveredfromtumornodulesafterinterferontherapy