Cargando…
Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy
We examined the modification of host T cells of tumor nodules by interferon (IFN) therapy in mouse models. The host cells were recovered from regressing tumor nodules of mice at Day 13 after intradermal tumor inoculation at Day 0 and administration of 5 × 10(5) U/mouse/day IFN at Day 6 to Day 10. Th...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
1990
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2114393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02583.x |
_version_ | 1783317349182472192 |
---|---|
author | Honjo, Kaoru Suhara, Yasuji Kataoka, Tateshi |
author_facet | Honjo, Kaoru Suhara, Yasuji Kataoka, Tateshi |
author_sort | Honjo, Kaoru |
collection | PubMed |
description | We examined the modification of host T cells of tumor nodules by interferon (IFN) therapy in mouse models. The host cells were recovered from regressing tumor nodules of mice at Day 13 after intradermal tumor inoculation at Day 0 and administration of 5 × 10(5) U/mouse/day IFN at Day 6 to Day 10. These host cells neutralized in vivo Meth A growth in a dose‐dependent fashion. In vitro treatment of these cells with anti‐Thy 1.2 monoclonal antibody and rabbit sera as a source of complement abrogated their tumor‐neutralizing activity, but only partially, indicating that both T cells and non‐T cells were involved in tumor neutralization. The finding that host cells from regressing tumor nodules of either Meth A or Meth 1, an antigenically distinct fibrosarcoma, neutralized both Meth A and Meth 1 tumors without much selectivity was consistent with possible non‐T cell involvement. Most of these characteristics of host cells of regressing nodules of IFN‐administered mice were also noted with host cells of progressing nodules of placebo‐administered mice and there was no significant difference in neutralizing activity qualitatively or quantitatively between the two sources of host cells. There was no significant difference in host T and B cell numbers and compositions of regressing and progressing nodules either. These essentially negative findings raise the possibility, among others, that the primary target host cells to be modified by IFN were not T cells, although the therapeutic effect of IFN was dependent on the host T cells. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5918053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1990 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59180532018-05-11 Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy Honjo, Kaoru Suhara, Yasuji Kataoka, Tateshi Jpn J Cancer Res Article We examined the modification of host T cells of tumor nodules by interferon (IFN) therapy in mouse models. The host cells were recovered from regressing tumor nodules of mice at Day 13 after intradermal tumor inoculation at Day 0 and administration of 5 × 10(5) U/mouse/day IFN at Day 6 to Day 10. These host cells neutralized in vivo Meth A growth in a dose‐dependent fashion. In vitro treatment of these cells with anti‐Thy 1.2 monoclonal antibody and rabbit sera as a source of complement abrogated their tumor‐neutralizing activity, but only partially, indicating that both T cells and non‐T cells were involved in tumor neutralization. The finding that host cells from regressing tumor nodules of either Meth A or Meth 1, an antigenically distinct fibrosarcoma, neutralized both Meth A and Meth 1 tumors without much selectivity was consistent with possible non‐T cell involvement. Most of these characteristics of host cells of regressing nodules of IFN‐administered mice were also noted with host cells of progressing nodules of placebo‐administered mice and there was no significant difference in neutralizing activity qualitatively or quantitatively between the two sources of host cells. There was no significant difference in host T and B cell numbers and compositions of regressing and progressing nodules either. These essentially negative findings raise the possibility, among others, that the primary target host cells to be modified by IFN were not T cells, although the therapeutic effect of IFN was dependent on the host T cells. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1990-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5918053/ /pubmed/2114393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02583.x Text en |
spellingShingle | Article Honjo, Kaoru Suhara, Yasuji Kataoka, Tateshi Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy |
title | Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy |
title_full | Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy |
title_fullStr | Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy |
title_short | Antitumor Activity of Host T and Non‐T Cells Recovered from Tumor Nodules after Interferon Therapy |
title_sort | antitumor activity of host t and non‐t cells recovered from tumor nodules after interferon therapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2114393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02583.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT honjokaoru antitumoractivityofhosttandnontcellsrecoveredfromtumornodulesafterinterferontherapy AT suharayasuji antitumoractivityofhosttandnontcellsrecoveredfromtumornodulesafterinterferontherapy AT kataokatateshi antitumoractivityofhosttandnontcellsrecoveredfromtumornodulesafterinterferontherapy |