Cargando…
The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer
The objective of this study was to assess the variability of readings made using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer for measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in the peripheral cornea and in angulated positions on the canine corneal surface. Forty-six client-owned dogs admitted for ophthalmic evalu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli and Libyan Authority for Research, Science and Technology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721435 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ovj.v8i1.12 |
_version_ | 1783317366456713216 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz Montiani-Ferreira, Fabiano Williams, David L. |
author_facet | de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz Montiani-Ferreira, Fabiano Williams, David L. |
author_sort | de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to assess the variability of readings made using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer for measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in the peripheral cornea and in angulated positions on the canine corneal surface. Forty-six client-owned dogs admitted for ophthalmic evaluation at the Queen’s Veterinary School Hospital, University of Cambridge were included in the study. IOP readings were taken at a variety of locations and using the tonometer at a number of different angles to the cornea: 1) Perpendicularly at center of the cornea (CC); 2) At the center of the cornea but with the tonometer positioned at four angles, and 3) At four different points on the peripheral cornea. All values were compared with the values recorded at the recommended CC position. IOP values were significantly underestimated in seven positions, with median and interquartile range from 12.1 ± 4 mmHg (nasal on periphery) to 15 ± 5 mmHg (laterally angled at center), varying between 0 mmHg to 2.9 mmHg from the CC value. While dorsally angled in the central cornea were not significantly different from those at CC (p = 0.09). Median values were lower for measurements in peripheral positions when compared to angled central positions. These results demonstrate that angling the tonometer or measuring in peripheral regions can result in small but statistically significant underestimation of IOP values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5918127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli and Libyan Authority for Research, Science and Technology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59181272018-05-02 The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz Montiani-Ferreira, Fabiano Williams, David L. Open Vet J Original Article The objective of this study was to assess the variability of readings made using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer for measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in the peripheral cornea and in angulated positions on the canine corneal surface. Forty-six client-owned dogs admitted for ophthalmic evaluation at the Queen’s Veterinary School Hospital, University of Cambridge were included in the study. IOP readings were taken at a variety of locations and using the tonometer at a number of different angles to the cornea: 1) Perpendicularly at center of the cornea (CC); 2) At the center of the cornea but with the tonometer positioned at four angles, and 3) At four different points on the peripheral cornea. All values were compared with the values recorded at the recommended CC position. IOP values were significantly underestimated in seven positions, with median and interquartile range from 12.1 ± 4 mmHg (nasal on periphery) to 15 ± 5 mmHg (laterally angled at center), varying between 0 mmHg to 2.9 mmHg from the CC value. While dorsally angled in the central cornea were not significantly different from those at CC (p = 0.09). Median values were lower for measurements in peripheral positions when compared to angled central positions. These results demonstrate that angling the tonometer or measuring in peripheral regions can result in small but statistically significant underestimation of IOP values. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli and Libyan Authority for Research, Science and Technology 2018 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5918127/ /pubmed/29721435 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ovj.v8i1.12 Text en Copyright: © Open Veterinary Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Open Veterinary Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Original Article de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz Montiani-Ferreira, Fabiano Williams, David L. The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer |
title | The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer |
title_full | The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer |
title_fullStr | The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer |
title_short | The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer |
title_sort | influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the tonovet(®) rebound tonometer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721435 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ovj.v8i1.12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveirajulianakravetz theinfluenceofthetonometerpositiononcanineintraocularpressuremeasurementsusingthetonovetreboundtonometer AT montianiferreirafabiano theinfluenceofthetonometerpositiononcanineintraocularpressuremeasurementsusingthetonovetreboundtonometer AT williamsdavidl theinfluenceofthetonometerpositiononcanineintraocularpressuremeasurementsusingthetonovetreboundtonometer AT deoliveirajulianakravetz influenceofthetonometerpositiononcanineintraocularpressuremeasurementsusingthetonovetreboundtonometer AT montianiferreirafabiano influenceofthetonometerpositiononcanineintraocularpressuremeasurementsusingthetonovetreboundtonometer AT williamsdavidl influenceofthetonometerpositiononcanineintraocularpressuremeasurementsusingthetonovetreboundtonometer |