Cargando…

The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer

The objective of this study was to assess the variability of readings made using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer for measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in the peripheral cornea and in angulated positions on the canine corneal surface. Forty-six client-owned dogs admitted for ophthalmic evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz, Montiani-Ferreira, Fabiano, Williams, David L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli and Libyan Authority for Research, Science and Technology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721435
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ovj.v8i1.12
_version_ 1783317366456713216
author de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz
Montiani-Ferreira, Fabiano
Williams, David L.
author_facet de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz
Montiani-Ferreira, Fabiano
Williams, David L.
author_sort de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to assess the variability of readings made using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer for measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in the peripheral cornea and in angulated positions on the canine corneal surface. Forty-six client-owned dogs admitted for ophthalmic evaluation at the Queen’s Veterinary School Hospital, University of Cambridge were included in the study. IOP readings were taken at a variety of locations and using the tonometer at a number of different angles to the cornea: 1) Perpendicularly at center of the cornea (CC); 2) At the center of the cornea but with the tonometer positioned at four angles, and 3) At four different points on the peripheral cornea. All values were compared with the values recorded at the recommended CC position. IOP values were significantly underestimated in seven positions, with median and interquartile range from 12.1 ± 4 mmHg (nasal on periphery) to 15 ± 5 mmHg (laterally angled at center), varying between 0 mmHg to 2.9 mmHg from the CC value. While dorsally angled in the central cornea were not significantly different from those at CC (p = 0.09). Median values were lower for measurements in peripheral positions when compared to angled central positions. These results demonstrate that angling the tonometer or measuring in peripheral regions can result in small but statistically significant underestimation of IOP values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5918127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli and Libyan Authority for Research, Science and Technology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59181272018-05-02 The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz Montiani-Ferreira, Fabiano Williams, David L. Open Vet J Original Article The objective of this study was to assess the variability of readings made using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer for measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in the peripheral cornea and in angulated positions on the canine corneal surface. Forty-six client-owned dogs admitted for ophthalmic evaluation at the Queen’s Veterinary School Hospital, University of Cambridge were included in the study. IOP readings were taken at a variety of locations and using the tonometer at a number of different angles to the cornea: 1) Perpendicularly at center of the cornea (CC); 2) At the center of the cornea but with the tonometer positioned at four angles, and 3) At four different points on the peripheral cornea. All values were compared with the values recorded at the recommended CC position. IOP values were significantly underestimated in seven positions, with median and interquartile range from 12.1 ± 4 mmHg (nasal on periphery) to 15 ± 5 mmHg (laterally angled at center), varying between 0 mmHg to 2.9 mmHg from the CC value. While dorsally angled in the central cornea were not significantly different from those at CC (p = 0.09). Median values were lower for measurements in peripheral positions when compared to angled central positions. These results demonstrate that angling the tonometer or measuring in peripheral regions can result in small but statistically significant underestimation of IOP values. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tripoli and Libyan Authority for Research, Science and Technology 2018 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5918127/ /pubmed/29721435 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ovj.v8i1.12 Text en Copyright: © Open Veterinary Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 Open Veterinary Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Original Article
de Oliveira, Juliana Kravetz
Montiani-Ferreira, Fabiano
Williams, David L.
The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer
title The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer
title_full The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer
title_fullStr The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer
title_full_unstemmed The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer
title_short The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet(®) rebound tonometer
title_sort influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the tonovet(®) rebound tonometer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721435
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ovj.v8i1.12
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveirajulianakravetz theinfluenceofthetonometerpositiononcanineintraocularpressuremeasurementsusingthetonovetreboundtonometer
AT montianiferreirafabiano theinfluenceofthetonometerpositiononcanineintraocularpressuremeasurementsusingthetonovetreboundtonometer
AT williamsdavidl theinfluenceofthetonometerpositiononcanineintraocularpressuremeasurementsusingthetonovetreboundtonometer
AT deoliveirajulianakravetz influenceofthetonometerpositiononcanineintraocularpressuremeasurementsusingthetonovetreboundtonometer
AT montianiferreirafabiano influenceofthetonometerpositiononcanineintraocularpressuremeasurementsusingthetonovetreboundtonometer
AT williamsdavidl influenceofthetonometerpositiononcanineintraocularpressuremeasurementsusingthetonovetreboundtonometer