Cargando…
A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis
The first tenet of medicine, “primum non nocere” or “first, do no harm”, is not always compatible with oncological interventions e.g., chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiation, since they commonly result in significant toxicities. One of the more frequent and serious treatment-induced toxicities...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Neoplasia Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29698934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2018.03.014 |
_version_ | 1783317368764628992 |
---|---|
author | Oronsky, Bryan Goyal, Sharad Kim, Michelle M. Cabrales, Pedro Lybeck, Michelle Caroen, Scott Oronsky, Neil Burbano, Erica Carter, Corey Oronsky, Arnold |
author_facet | Oronsky, Bryan Goyal, Sharad Kim, Michelle M. Cabrales, Pedro Lybeck, Michelle Caroen, Scott Oronsky, Neil Burbano, Erica Carter, Corey Oronsky, Arnold |
author_sort | Oronsky, Bryan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The first tenet of medicine, “primum non nocere” or “first, do no harm”, is not always compatible with oncological interventions e.g., chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiation, since they commonly result in significant toxicities. One of the more frequent and serious treatment-induced toxicities is mucositis and particularly oral mucositis (OM) described as inflammation, atrophy and breakdown of the mucosa or lining of the oral cavity. The sequelae of oral mucositis (OM), which include pain, odynodysphagia, dysgeusia, decreased oral intake and systemic infection, frequently require treatment delays, interruptions and discontinuations that not only negatively impact quality of life but also tumor control and survivorship. One potential strategy to reduce or prevent the development of mucositis, for which no effective therapies exist only best supportive empirical care measures, is the administration of agents referred to as radioprotectors and/or chemoprotectors, which are intended to differentially protect normal but not malignant tissue from cytotoxicity. This limited-scope review briefly summarizes the incidence, pathogenesis, symptoms and impact on patients of OM as well as the background and mechanisms of four clinical stage radioprotectors/chemoprotectors, amifostine, palifermin, GC4419 and RRx-001, with the proven or theoretical potential to minimize the development of mucositis particularly in the treatment of head and neck cancers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5918142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Neoplasia Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59181422018-04-30 A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis Oronsky, Bryan Goyal, Sharad Kim, Michelle M. Cabrales, Pedro Lybeck, Michelle Caroen, Scott Oronsky, Neil Burbano, Erica Carter, Corey Oronsky, Arnold Transl Oncol Review article The first tenet of medicine, “primum non nocere” or “first, do no harm”, is not always compatible with oncological interventions e.g., chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiation, since they commonly result in significant toxicities. One of the more frequent and serious treatment-induced toxicities is mucositis and particularly oral mucositis (OM) described as inflammation, atrophy and breakdown of the mucosa or lining of the oral cavity. The sequelae of oral mucositis (OM), which include pain, odynodysphagia, dysgeusia, decreased oral intake and systemic infection, frequently require treatment delays, interruptions and discontinuations that not only negatively impact quality of life but also tumor control and survivorship. One potential strategy to reduce or prevent the development of mucositis, for which no effective therapies exist only best supportive empirical care measures, is the administration of agents referred to as radioprotectors and/or chemoprotectors, which are intended to differentially protect normal but not malignant tissue from cytotoxicity. This limited-scope review briefly summarizes the incidence, pathogenesis, symptoms and impact on patients of OM as well as the background and mechanisms of four clinical stage radioprotectors/chemoprotectors, amifostine, palifermin, GC4419 and RRx-001, with the proven or theoretical potential to minimize the development of mucositis particularly in the treatment of head and neck cancers. Neoplasia Press 2018-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5918142/ /pubmed/29698934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2018.03.014 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review article Oronsky, Bryan Goyal, Sharad Kim, Michelle M. Cabrales, Pedro Lybeck, Michelle Caroen, Scott Oronsky, Neil Burbano, Erica Carter, Corey Oronsky, Arnold A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis |
title | A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis |
title_full | A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis |
title_fullStr | A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis |
title_short | A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis |
title_sort | review of clinical radioprotection and chemoprotection for oral mucositis |
topic | Review article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29698934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2018.03.014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oronskybryan areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT goyalsharad areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT kimmichellem areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT cabralespedro areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT lybeckmichelle areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT caroenscott areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT oronskyneil areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT burbanoerica areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT cartercorey areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT oronskyarnold areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT oronskybryan reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT goyalsharad reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT kimmichellem reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT cabralespedro reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT lybeckmichelle reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT caroenscott reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT oronskyneil reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT burbanoerica reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT cartercorey reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis AT oronskyarnold reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis |