Cargando…

A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis

The first tenet of medicine, “primum non nocere” or “first, do no harm”, is not always compatible with oncological interventions e.g., chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiation, since they commonly result in significant toxicities. One of the more frequent and serious treatment-induced toxicities...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oronsky, Bryan, Goyal, Sharad, Kim, Michelle M., Cabrales, Pedro, Lybeck, Michelle, Caroen, Scott, Oronsky, Neil, Burbano, Erica, Carter, Corey, Oronsky, Arnold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29698934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2018.03.014
_version_ 1783317368764628992
author Oronsky, Bryan
Goyal, Sharad
Kim, Michelle M.
Cabrales, Pedro
Lybeck, Michelle
Caroen, Scott
Oronsky, Neil
Burbano, Erica
Carter, Corey
Oronsky, Arnold
author_facet Oronsky, Bryan
Goyal, Sharad
Kim, Michelle M.
Cabrales, Pedro
Lybeck, Michelle
Caroen, Scott
Oronsky, Neil
Burbano, Erica
Carter, Corey
Oronsky, Arnold
author_sort Oronsky, Bryan
collection PubMed
description The first tenet of medicine, “primum non nocere” or “first, do no harm”, is not always compatible with oncological interventions e.g., chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiation, since they commonly result in significant toxicities. One of the more frequent and serious treatment-induced toxicities is mucositis and particularly oral mucositis (OM) described as inflammation, atrophy and breakdown of the mucosa or lining of the oral cavity. The sequelae of oral mucositis (OM), which include pain, odynodysphagia, dysgeusia, decreased oral intake and systemic infection, frequently require treatment delays, interruptions and discontinuations that not only negatively impact quality of life but also tumor control and survivorship. One potential strategy to reduce or prevent the development of mucositis, for which no effective therapies exist only best supportive empirical care measures, is the administration of agents referred to as radioprotectors and/or chemoprotectors, which are intended to differentially protect normal but not malignant tissue from cytotoxicity. This limited-scope review briefly summarizes the incidence, pathogenesis, symptoms and impact on patients of OM as well as the background and mechanisms of four clinical stage radioprotectors/chemoprotectors, amifostine, palifermin, GC4419 and RRx-001, with the proven or theoretical potential to minimize the development of mucositis particularly in the treatment of head and neck cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5918142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59181422018-04-30 A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis Oronsky, Bryan Goyal, Sharad Kim, Michelle M. Cabrales, Pedro Lybeck, Michelle Caroen, Scott Oronsky, Neil Burbano, Erica Carter, Corey Oronsky, Arnold Transl Oncol Review article The first tenet of medicine, “primum non nocere” or “first, do no harm”, is not always compatible with oncological interventions e.g., chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiation, since they commonly result in significant toxicities. One of the more frequent and serious treatment-induced toxicities is mucositis and particularly oral mucositis (OM) described as inflammation, atrophy and breakdown of the mucosa or lining of the oral cavity. The sequelae of oral mucositis (OM), which include pain, odynodysphagia, dysgeusia, decreased oral intake and systemic infection, frequently require treatment delays, interruptions and discontinuations that not only negatively impact quality of life but also tumor control and survivorship. One potential strategy to reduce or prevent the development of mucositis, for which no effective therapies exist only best supportive empirical care measures, is the administration of agents referred to as radioprotectors and/or chemoprotectors, which are intended to differentially protect normal but not malignant tissue from cytotoxicity. This limited-scope review briefly summarizes the incidence, pathogenesis, symptoms and impact on patients of OM as well as the background and mechanisms of four clinical stage radioprotectors/chemoprotectors, amifostine, palifermin, GC4419 and RRx-001, with the proven or theoretical potential to minimize the development of mucositis particularly in the treatment of head and neck cancers. Neoplasia Press 2018-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5918142/ /pubmed/29698934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2018.03.014 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review article
Oronsky, Bryan
Goyal, Sharad
Kim, Michelle M.
Cabrales, Pedro
Lybeck, Michelle
Caroen, Scott
Oronsky, Neil
Burbano, Erica
Carter, Corey
Oronsky, Arnold
A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis
title A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis
title_full A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis
title_fullStr A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis
title_short A Review of Clinical Radioprotection and Chemoprotection for Oral Mucositis
title_sort review of clinical radioprotection and chemoprotection for oral mucositis
topic Review article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29698934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2018.03.014
work_keys_str_mv AT oronskybryan areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT goyalsharad areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT kimmichellem areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT cabralespedro areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT lybeckmichelle areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT caroenscott areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT oronskyneil areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT burbanoerica areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT cartercorey areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT oronskyarnold areviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT oronskybryan reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT goyalsharad reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT kimmichellem reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT cabralespedro reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT lybeckmichelle reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT caroenscott reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT oronskyneil reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT burbanoerica reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT cartercorey reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis
AT oronskyarnold reviewofclinicalradioprotectionandchemoprotectionfororalmucositis