Cargando…

Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE: The Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) is a new option for treating patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA). This study investigated long-term efficacy, adherence, and quality of life during use of the SPT device compared with oral appliance therapy (OAT) in patients with POSA. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Ruiter, Maurits H. T., Benoist, Linda B. L., de Vries, Nico, de Lange, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1568-4
_version_ 1783317427300335616
author de Ruiter, Maurits H. T.
Benoist, Linda B. L.
de Vries, Nico
de Lange, Jan
author_facet de Ruiter, Maurits H. T.
Benoist, Linda B. L.
de Vries, Nico
de Lange, Jan
author_sort de Ruiter, Maurits H. T.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) is a new option for treating patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA). This study investigated long-term efficacy, adherence, and quality of life during use of the SPT device compared with oral appliance therapy (OAT) in patients with POSA. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter trial randomized patients with mild to moderate POSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 5–30/h) to SPT or OAT. Polysomnography was performed at baseline and after 3 and 12 months’ follow-up. The primary endpoint was OSA severity; adherence, quality of life, and adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were randomized and 58 completed the study (29 in each group). Median AHI in the SPT group decreased from 13.2/h at baseline to 7.1/h after 12 months (P < 0.001); corresponding values in the OAT group were 13.4/h and 5.0/h (P < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference (P = 1.000). Improvements throughout the study were maintained at 12 months. Long-term median adherence was also similar in the two treatment groups; the proportion of patients who used their device for ≥ 4 h for 5 days in a week was 100% in the SPT group and 97.0% in the OAT group (P = 0.598). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of SPT therapy was maintained over 12 months and was comparable to that of OAT in patients with mild to moderate POSA. Adherence was relatively high, and similar in the two groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02045576). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11325-017-1568-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5918490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59184902018-04-30 Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial de Ruiter, Maurits H. T. Benoist, Linda B. L. de Vries, Nico de Lange, Jan Sleep Breath Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article PURPOSE: The Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) is a new option for treating patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA). This study investigated long-term efficacy, adherence, and quality of life during use of the SPT device compared with oral appliance therapy (OAT) in patients with POSA. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter trial randomized patients with mild to moderate POSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 5–30/h) to SPT or OAT. Polysomnography was performed at baseline and after 3 and 12 months’ follow-up. The primary endpoint was OSA severity; adherence, quality of life, and adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were randomized and 58 completed the study (29 in each group). Median AHI in the SPT group decreased from 13.2/h at baseline to 7.1/h after 12 months (P < 0.001); corresponding values in the OAT group were 13.4/h and 5.0/h (P < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference (P = 1.000). Improvements throughout the study were maintained at 12 months. Long-term median adherence was also similar in the two treatment groups; the proportion of patients who used their device for ≥ 4 h for 5 days in a week was 100% in the SPT group and 97.0% in the OAT group (P = 0.598). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of SPT therapy was maintained over 12 months and was comparable to that of OAT in patients with mild to moderate POSA. Adherence was relatively high, and similar in the two groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02045576). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11325-017-1568-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-09-15 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5918490/ /pubmed/28913630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1568-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017, corrected publication October/2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
de Ruiter, Maurits H. T.
Benoist, Linda B. L.
de Vries, Nico
de Lange, Jan
Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
title Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
title_full Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
title_short Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
title_sort durability of treatment effects of the sleep position trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional osa: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
topic Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1568-4
work_keys_str_mv AT deruitermauritsht durabilityoftreatmenteffectsofthesleeppositiontrainerversusoralappliancetherapyinpositionalosa12monthfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT benoistlindabl durabilityoftreatmenteffectsofthesleeppositiontrainerversusoralappliancetherapyinpositionalosa12monthfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT devriesnico durabilityoftreatmenteffectsofthesleeppositiontrainerversusoralappliancetherapyinpositionalosa12monthfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT delangejan durabilityoftreatmenteffectsofthesleeppositiontrainerversusoralappliancetherapyinpositionalosa12monthfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial