Cargando…

Evaluation of the “Foundations in Knowledge Translation” training initiative: preparing end users to practice KT

BACKGROUND: Current knowledge translation (KT) training initiatives are primarily focused on preparing researchers to conduct KT research rather than on teaching KT practice to end users. Furthermore, training initiatives that focus on KT practice have not been rigorously evaluated and have focused...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jamie S., Moore, Julia E., Sayal, Radha, Holmes, Bev J., Scarrow, Gayle, Graham, Ian D., Jeffs, Lianne, Timmings, Caitlyn, Rashid, Shusmita, Johnson, Alekhya Mascarenhas, Straus, Sharon E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0755-4
_version_ 1783317428008124416
author Park, Jamie S.
Moore, Julia E.
Sayal, Radha
Holmes, Bev J.
Scarrow, Gayle
Graham, Ian D.
Jeffs, Lianne
Timmings, Caitlyn
Rashid, Shusmita
Johnson, Alekhya Mascarenhas
Straus, Sharon E.
author_facet Park, Jamie S.
Moore, Julia E.
Sayal, Radha
Holmes, Bev J.
Scarrow, Gayle
Graham, Ian D.
Jeffs, Lianne
Timmings, Caitlyn
Rashid, Shusmita
Johnson, Alekhya Mascarenhas
Straus, Sharon E.
author_sort Park, Jamie S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current knowledge translation (KT) training initiatives are primarily focused on preparing researchers to conduct KT research rather than on teaching KT practice to end users. Furthermore, training initiatives that focus on KT practice have not been rigorously evaluated and have focused on assessing short-term outcomes and participant satisfaction only. Thus, there is a need for longitudinal training evaluations that assess the sustainability of training outcomes and contextual factors that may influence outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated the KT training initiative “Foundations in KT” using a mixed-methods longitudinal design. “Foundations in KT” provided training in KT practice and included three tailored in-person workshops, coaching, and an online platform for training materials and knowledge exchange. Two cohorts were included in the study (62 participants, including 46 “Foundations in KT” participants from 16 project teams and 16 decision-maker partners). Participants completed self-report questionnaires, focus groups, and interviews at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the first workshop. RESULTS: Participant-level outcomes include survey results which indicated that participants’ self-efficacy in evidence-based practice (F(1,8.9) = 23.7, p = 0.001, n = 45), KT activities (F(1,23.9) = 43.2, p < 0.001, n = 45), and using evidence to inform practice increased over time (F(1,11.0) = 6.0, p = 0.03, n = 45). Interviews and focus groups illustrated that participants’ understanding of and confidence in using KT increased from baseline to 24 months after the workshop. Interviews and focus groups suggested that the training initiative helped participants achieve their KT project objectives, plan their projects, and solve problems over time. Contextual factors include teams with high self-reported organizational capacity and commitment to implement at the start of their project had buy-in from upper management that resulted in secured funding and resources for their project. Training initiative outcomes include participants who applied the KT knowledge and skills they learned to other projects by sharing their knowledge informally with coworkers. Sustained spread of KT practice was observed with five teams at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: We completed a longitudinal evaluation of a KT training initiative. Positive participant outcomes were sustained until 24 months after the initial workshop. Given the emphasis on implementing evidence and the need to train implementers, these findings are promising for future KT training. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0755-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5918493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59184932018-04-30 Evaluation of the “Foundations in Knowledge Translation” training initiative: preparing end users to practice KT Park, Jamie S. Moore, Julia E. Sayal, Radha Holmes, Bev J. Scarrow, Gayle Graham, Ian D. Jeffs, Lianne Timmings, Caitlyn Rashid, Shusmita Johnson, Alekhya Mascarenhas Straus, Sharon E. Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Current knowledge translation (KT) training initiatives are primarily focused on preparing researchers to conduct KT research rather than on teaching KT practice to end users. Furthermore, training initiatives that focus on KT practice have not been rigorously evaluated and have focused on assessing short-term outcomes and participant satisfaction only. Thus, there is a need for longitudinal training evaluations that assess the sustainability of training outcomes and contextual factors that may influence outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated the KT training initiative “Foundations in KT” using a mixed-methods longitudinal design. “Foundations in KT” provided training in KT practice and included three tailored in-person workshops, coaching, and an online platform for training materials and knowledge exchange. Two cohorts were included in the study (62 participants, including 46 “Foundations in KT” participants from 16 project teams and 16 decision-maker partners). Participants completed self-report questionnaires, focus groups, and interviews at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the first workshop. RESULTS: Participant-level outcomes include survey results which indicated that participants’ self-efficacy in evidence-based practice (F(1,8.9) = 23.7, p = 0.001, n = 45), KT activities (F(1,23.9) = 43.2, p < 0.001, n = 45), and using evidence to inform practice increased over time (F(1,11.0) = 6.0, p = 0.03, n = 45). Interviews and focus groups illustrated that participants’ understanding of and confidence in using KT increased from baseline to 24 months after the workshop. Interviews and focus groups suggested that the training initiative helped participants achieve their KT project objectives, plan their projects, and solve problems over time. Contextual factors include teams with high self-reported organizational capacity and commitment to implement at the start of their project had buy-in from upper management that resulted in secured funding and resources for their project. Training initiative outcomes include participants who applied the KT knowledge and skills they learned to other projects by sharing their knowledge informally with coworkers. Sustained spread of KT practice was observed with five teams at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: We completed a longitudinal evaluation of a KT training initiative. Positive participant outcomes were sustained until 24 months after the initial workshop. Given the emphasis on implementing evidence and the need to train implementers, these findings are promising for future KT training. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0755-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5918493/ /pubmed/29695267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0755-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Park, Jamie S.
Moore, Julia E.
Sayal, Radha
Holmes, Bev J.
Scarrow, Gayle
Graham, Ian D.
Jeffs, Lianne
Timmings, Caitlyn
Rashid, Shusmita
Johnson, Alekhya Mascarenhas
Straus, Sharon E.
Evaluation of the “Foundations in Knowledge Translation” training initiative: preparing end users to practice KT
title Evaluation of the “Foundations in Knowledge Translation” training initiative: preparing end users to practice KT
title_full Evaluation of the “Foundations in Knowledge Translation” training initiative: preparing end users to practice KT
title_fullStr Evaluation of the “Foundations in Knowledge Translation” training initiative: preparing end users to practice KT
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the “Foundations in Knowledge Translation” training initiative: preparing end users to practice KT
title_short Evaluation of the “Foundations in Knowledge Translation” training initiative: preparing end users to practice KT
title_sort evaluation of the “foundations in knowledge translation” training initiative: preparing end users to practice kt
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0755-4
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjamies evaluationofthefoundationsinknowledgetranslationtraininginitiativepreparingenduserstopracticekt
AT moorejuliae evaluationofthefoundationsinknowledgetranslationtraininginitiativepreparingenduserstopracticekt
AT sayalradha evaluationofthefoundationsinknowledgetranslationtraininginitiativepreparingenduserstopracticekt
AT holmesbevj evaluationofthefoundationsinknowledgetranslationtraininginitiativepreparingenduserstopracticekt
AT scarrowgayle evaluationofthefoundationsinknowledgetranslationtraininginitiativepreparingenduserstopracticekt
AT grahamiand evaluationofthefoundationsinknowledgetranslationtraininginitiativepreparingenduserstopracticekt
AT jeffslianne evaluationofthefoundationsinknowledgetranslationtraininginitiativepreparingenduserstopracticekt
AT timmingscaitlyn evaluationofthefoundationsinknowledgetranslationtraininginitiativepreparingenduserstopracticekt
AT rashidshusmita evaluationofthefoundationsinknowledgetranslationtraininginitiativepreparingenduserstopracticekt
AT johnsonalekhyamascarenhas evaluationofthefoundationsinknowledgetranslationtraininginitiativepreparingenduserstopracticekt
AT straussharone evaluationofthefoundationsinknowledgetranslationtraininginitiativepreparingenduserstopracticekt