Cargando…

Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The use of neurorobotic devices may improve gait recovery by entraining specific brain plasticity mechanisms, which may be a key issue for successful rehabilitation using such approach. We assessed whether the wearable exoskeleton, Ekso™, could get higher gait performance than convention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore, Naro, Antonino, Russo, Margherita, Bramanti, Placido, Carioti, Luigi, Balletta, Tina, Buda, Antonio, Manuli, Alfredo, Filoni, Serena, Bramanti, Alessia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0377-8
_version_ 1783317443118104576
author Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore
Naro, Antonino
Russo, Margherita
Bramanti, Placido
Carioti, Luigi
Balletta, Tina
Buda, Antonio
Manuli, Alfredo
Filoni, Serena
Bramanti, Alessia
author_facet Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore
Naro, Antonino
Russo, Margherita
Bramanti, Placido
Carioti, Luigi
Balletta, Tina
Buda, Antonio
Manuli, Alfredo
Filoni, Serena
Bramanti, Alessia
author_sort Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of neurorobotic devices may improve gait recovery by entraining specific brain plasticity mechanisms, which may be a key issue for successful rehabilitation using such approach. We assessed whether the wearable exoskeleton, Ekso™, could get higher gait performance than conventional overground gait training (OGT) in patients with hemiparesis due to stroke in a chronic phase, and foster the recovery of specific brain plasticity mechanisms. METHODS: We enrolled forty patients in a prospective, pre-post, randomized clinical study. Twenty patients underwent Ekso™ gait training (EGT) (45-min/session, five times/week), in addition to overground gait therapy, whilst 20 patients practiced an OGT of the same duration. All individuals were evaluated about gait performance (10 m walking test), gait cycle, muscle activation pattern (by recording surface electromyography from lower limb muscles), frontoparietal effective connectivity (FPEC) by using EEG, cortico-spinal excitability (CSE), and sensory-motor integration (SMI) from both primary motor areas by using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation paradigm before and after the gait training. RESULTS: A significant effect size was found in the EGT-induced improvement in the 10 m walking test (d = 0.9, p < 0.001), CSE in the affected side (d = 0.7, p = 0.001), SMI in the affected side (d = 0.5, p = 0.03), overall gait quality (d = 0.8, p = 0.001), hip and knee muscle activation (d = 0.8, p = 0.001), and FPEC (d = 0.8, p = 0.001). The strengthening of FPEC (r = 0.601, p < 0.001), the increase of SMI in the affected side (r = 0.554, p < 0.001), and the decrease of SMI in the unaffected side (r = − 0.540, p < 0.001) were the most important factors correlated with the clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Ekso™ gait training seems promising in gait rehabilitation for post-stroke patients, besides OGT. Our study proposes a putative neurophysiological basis supporting Ekso™ after-effects. This knowledge may be useful to plan highly patient-tailored gait rehabilitation protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03162263.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5918557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59185572018-04-30 Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore Naro, Antonino Russo, Margherita Bramanti, Placido Carioti, Luigi Balletta, Tina Buda, Antonio Manuli, Alfredo Filoni, Serena Bramanti, Alessia J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: The use of neurorobotic devices may improve gait recovery by entraining specific brain plasticity mechanisms, which may be a key issue for successful rehabilitation using such approach. We assessed whether the wearable exoskeleton, Ekso™, could get higher gait performance than conventional overground gait training (OGT) in patients with hemiparesis due to stroke in a chronic phase, and foster the recovery of specific brain plasticity mechanisms. METHODS: We enrolled forty patients in a prospective, pre-post, randomized clinical study. Twenty patients underwent Ekso™ gait training (EGT) (45-min/session, five times/week), in addition to overground gait therapy, whilst 20 patients practiced an OGT of the same duration. All individuals were evaluated about gait performance (10 m walking test), gait cycle, muscle activation pattern (by recording surface electromyography from lower limb muscles), frontoparietal effective connectivity (FPEC) by using EEG, cortico-spinal excitability (CSE), and sensory-motor integration (SMI) from both primary motor areas by using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation paradigm before and after the gait training. RESULTS: A significant effect size was found in the EGT-induced improvement in the 10 m walking test (d = 0.9, p < 0.001), CSE in the affected side (d = 0.7, p = 0.001), SMI in the affected side (d = 0.5, p = 0.03), overall gait quality (d = 0.8, p = 0.001), hip and knee muscle activation (d = 0.8, p = 0.001), and FPEC (d = 0.8, p = 0.001). The strengthening of FPEC (r = 0.601, p < 0.001), the increase of SMI in the affected side (r = 0.554, p < 0.001), and the decrease of SMI in the unaffected side (r = − 0.540, p < 0.001) were the most important factors correlated with the clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Ekso™ gait training seems promising in gait rehabilitation for post-stroke patients, besides OGT. Our study proposes a putative neurophysiological basis supporting Ekso™ after-effects. This knowledge may be useful to plan highly patient-tailored gait rehabilitation protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03162263. BioMed Central 2018-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5918557/ /pubmed/29695280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0377-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Calabrò, Rocco Salvatore
Naro, Antonino
Russo, Margherita
Bramanti, Placido
Carioti, Luigi
Balletta, Tina
Buda, Antonio
Manuli, Alfredo
Filoni, Serena
Bramanti, Alessia
Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial
title Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0377-8
work_keys_str_mv AT calabroroccosalvatore shapingneuroplasticitybyusingpoweredexoskeletonsinpatientswithstrokearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT naroantonino shapingneuroplasticitybyusingpoweredexoskeletonsinpatientswithstrokearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT russomargherita shapingneuroplasticitybyusingpoweredexoskeletonsinpatientswithstrokearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bramantiplacido shapingneuroplasticitybyusingpoweredexoskeletonsinpatientswithstrokearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT cariotiluigi shapingneuroplasticitybyusingpoweredexoskeletonsinpatientswithstrokearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ballettatina shapingneuroplasticitybyusingpoweredexoskeletonsinpatientswithstrokearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT budaantonio shapingneuroplasticitybyusingpoweredexoskeletonsinpatientswithstrokearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT manulialfredo shapingneuroplasticitybyusingpoweredexoskeletonsinpatientswithstrokearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT filoniserena shapingneuroplasticitybyusingpoweredexoskeletonsinpatientswithstrokearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bramantialessia shapingneuroplasticitybyusingpoweredexoskeletonsinpatientswithstrokearandomizedclinicaltrial