Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of a colorectal cancer screening programme in a high adenoma prevalence scenario using MISCAN-Colon microsimulation model

BACKGROUND: The Basque Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme began in 2009 and the implementation has been complete since 2013. Faecal immunological testing was used for screening in individuals between 50 and 69 years old. Colorectal Cancer in Basque country is characterized by unusual epidemiologi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arrospide, Arantzazu, Idigoras, Isabel, Mar, Javier, de Koning, Harry, van der Meulen, Miriam, Soto-Gordoa, Myriam, Martinez-Llorente, Jose Miguel, Portillo, Isabel, Arana-Arri, Eunate, Ibarrondo, Oliver, Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4362-1
_version_ 1783317515489771520
author Arrospide, Arantzazu
Idigoras, Isabel
Mar, Javier
de Koning, Harry
van der Meulen, Miriam
Soto-Gordoa, Myriam
Martinez-Llorente, Jose Miguel
Portillo, Isabel
Arana-Arri, Eunate
Ibarrondo, Oliver
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
author_facet Arrospide, Arantzazu
Idigoras, Isabel
Mar, Javier
de Koning, Harry
van der Meulen, Miriam
Soto-Gordoa, Myriam
Martinez-Llorente, Jose Miguel
Portillo, Isabel
Arana-Arri, Eunate
Ibarrondo, Oliver
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
author_sort Arrospide, Arantzazu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Basque Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme began in 2009 and the implementation has been complete since 2013. Faecal immunological testing was used for screening in individuals between 50 and 69 years old. Colorectal Cancer in Basque country is characterized by unusual epidemiological features given that Colorectal Cancer incidence is similar to other European countries while adenoma prevalence is higher. The object of our study was to economically evaluate the programme via cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses with microsimulation models. METHODS: We applied the Microsimulation Screening Analysis (MISCAN)-Colon model to predict trends in Colorectal Cancer incidence and mortality and to quantify the short- and long-term effects and costs of the Basque Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme. The model was calibrated to the Basque demographics in 2008 and age-specific Colorectal Cancer incidence data in the Basque Cancer Registry from 2005 to 2008 before the screening begun. The model was also calibrated to the high adenoma prevalence observed for the Basque population in a previously published study. The multi-cohort approach used in the model included all the cohorts in the programme during 30 years of implementation, with lifetime follow-up. Unit costs were obtained from the Basque Health Service and both cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis were carried out. RESULTS: The goodness-of-fit of the model adaptation to observed programme data was evidence of validation. In the cost-effectiveness analysis, the savings from treatment were larger than the added costs due to screening. Thus, the Basque programme was dominant compared to no screening, as life expectancy increased by 29.3 days per person. The savings in the budget analysis appeared 10 years after the complete implementation of the programme. The average annual budget was €73.4 million from year 2023 onwards. CONCLUSIONS: This economic evaluation showed a screening intervention with a major health gain that also produced net savings when a long follow-up was used to capture the late economic benefit. The number of colonoscopies required was high but remain within the capacity of the Basque Health Service. So far in Europe, no other population Colorectal Cancer screening programme has been evaluated by budget impact analysis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4362-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5918894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59188942018-04-30 Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of a colorectal cancer screening programme in a high adenoma prevalence scenario using MISCAN-Colon microsimulation model Arrospide, Arantzazu Idigoras, Isabel Mar, Javier de Koning, Harry van der Meulen, Miriam Soto-Gordoa, Myriam Martinez-Llorente, Jose Miguel Portillo, Isabel Arana-Arri, Eunate Ibarrondo, Oliver Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The Basque Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme began in 2009 and the implementation has been complete since 2013. Faecal immunological testing was used for screening in individuals between 50 and 69 years old. Colorectal Cancer in Basque country is characterized by unusual epidemiological features given that Colorectal Cancer incidence is similar to other European countries while adenoma prevalence is higher. The object of our study was to economically evaluate the programme via cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses with microsimulation models. METHODS: We applied the Microsimulation Screening Analysis (MISCAN)-Colon model to predict trends in Colorectal Cancer incidence and mortality and to quantify the short- and long-term effects and costs of the Basque Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme. The model was calibrated to the Basque demographics in 2008 and age-specific Colorectal Cancer incidence data in the Basque Cancer Registry from 2005 to 2008 before the screening begun. The model was also calibrated to the high adenoma prevalence observed for the Basque population in a previously published study. The multi-cohort approach used in the model included all the cohorts in the programme during 30 years of implementation, with lifetime follow-up. Unit costs were obtained from the Basque Health Service and both cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis were carried out. RESULTS: The goodness-of-fit of the model adaptation to observed programme data was evidence of validation. In the cost-effectiveness analysis, the savings from treatment were larger than the added costs due to screening. Thus, the Basque programme was dominant compared to no screening, as life expectancy increased by 29.3 days per person. The savings in the budget analysis appeared 10 years after the complete implementation of the programme. The average annual budget was €73.4 million from year 2023 onwards. CONCLUSIONS: This economic evaluation showed a screening intervention with a major health gain that also produced net savings when a long follow-up was used to capture the late economic benefit. The number of colonoscopies required was high but remain within the capacity of the Basque Health Service. So far in Europe, no other population Colorectal Cancer screening programme has been evaluated by budget impact analysis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4362-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5918894/ /pubmed/29695234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4362-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Arrospide, Arantzazu
Idigoras, Isabel
Mar, Javier
de Koning, Harry
van der Meulen, Miriam
Soto-Gordoa, Myriam
Martinez-Llorente, Jose Miguel
Portillo, Isabel
Arana-Arri, Eunate
Ibarrondo, Oliver
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of a colorectal cancer screening programme in a high adenoma prevalence scenario using MISCAN-Colon microsimulation model
title Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of a colorectal cancer screening programme in a high adenoma prevalence scenario using MISCAN-Colon microsimulation model
title_full Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of a colorectal cancer screening programme in a high adenoma prevalence scenario using MISCAN-Colon microsimulation model
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of a colorectal cancer screening programme in a high adenoma prevalence scenario using MISCAN-Colon microsimulation model
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of a colorectal cancer screening programme in a high adenoma prevalence scenario using MISCAN-Colon microsimulation model
title_short Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of a colorectal cancer screening programme in a high adenoma prevalence scenario using MISCAN-Colon microsimulation model
title_sort cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of a colorectal cancer screening programme in a high adenoma prevalence scenario using miscan-colon microsimulation model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5918894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4362-1
work_keys_str_mv AT arrospidearantzazu costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysesofacolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeinahighadenomaprevalencescenariousingmiscancolonmicrosimulationmodel
AT idigorasisabel costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysesofacolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeinahighadenomaprevalencescenariousingmiscancolonmicrosimulationmodel
AT marjavier costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysesofacolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeinahighadenomaprevalencescenariousingmiscancolonmicrosimulationmodel
AT dekoningharry costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysesofacolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeinahighadenomaprevalencescenariousingmiscancolonmicrosimulationmodel
AT vandermeulenmiriam costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysesofacolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeinahighadenomaprevalencescenariousingmiscancolonmicrosimulationmodel
AT sotogordoamyriam costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysesofacolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeinahighadenomaprevalencescenariousingmiscancolonmicrosimulationmodel
AT martinezllorentejosemiguel costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysesofacolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeinahighadenomaprevalencescenariousingmiscancolonmicrosimulationmodel
AT portilloisabel costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysesofacolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeinahighadenomaprevalencescenariousingmiscancolonmicrosimulationmodel
AT aranaarrieunate costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysesofacolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeinahighadenomaprevalencescenariousingmiscancolonmicrosimulationmodel
AT ibarrondooliver costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysesofacolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeinahighadenomaprevalencescenariousingmiscancolonmicrosimulationmodel
AT lansdorpvogelaariris costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysesofacolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeinahighadenomaprevalencescenariousingmiscancolonmicrosimulationmodel