Cargando…

The psychometric properties of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Canadian military personnel

The psychometric properties of the ten-item Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10) have been extensively explored in civilian populations. However, documentation of its psychometric properties in military populations is limited, and there is no universally accepted cut-off score on the K10 to di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sampasa-Kanyinga, Hugues, Zamorski, Mark A., Colman, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5919406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29698459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196562
_version_ 1783317619231686656
author Sampasa-Kanyinga, Hugues
Zamorski, Mark A.
Colman, Ian
author_facet Sampasa-Kanyinga, Hugues
Zamorski, Mark A.
Colman, Ian
author_sort Sampasa-Kanyinga, Hugues
collection PubMed
description The psychometric properties of the ten-item Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10) have been extensively explored in civilian populations. However, documentation of its psychometric properties in military populations is limited, and there is no universally accepted cut-off score on the K10 to distinguish clinical vs. sub-clinical levels of distress. The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the K10 in Canadian Armed Forces personnel. Data on 6700 Regular Forces personnel were obtained from the 2013 Canadian Forces Mental Health Survey. The internal consistency and factor structure of the K10 (range, 0–40) were examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to select optimal cut-offs for the K10, using the presence/absence of any of four past-month disorders as the outcome (posttraumatic stress disorder, major depressive episode, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic disorder). Cronbach’s alpha (0.88) indicated a high level of internal consistency of the K10. Results from CFA indicated that a single-factor 10-item construct had an acceptable overall fit: root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.05; 90% confidence interval (CI):0.05–0.06, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.99, weighted root mean square residual (WRMR) = 2.06. K10 scores were strongly associated with both the presence and recency of all four measured disorders. The area under the ROC curve was 0.92, demonstrating excellent predictive value for past-30-day disorders. A K10 score of 10 or greater was optimal for screening purposes (sensitivity = 86%; specificity = 83%), while a score of 17 or greater (sensitivity = 53%; specificity = 97%) was optimal for prevalence estimation of clinically significant psychological distress, in that it resulted in equal numbers of false positives and false negatives. Our results suggest that K10 scale has satisfactory psychometric properties for use as a measure of non-specific psychological distress in the military population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5919406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59194062018-05-11 The psychometric properties of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Canadian military personnel Sampasa-Kanyinga, Hugues Zamorski, Mark A. Colman, Ian PLoS One Research Article The psychometric properties of the ten-item Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10) have been extensively explored in civilian populations. However, documentation of its psychometric properties in military populations is limited, and there is no universally accepted cut-off score on the K10 to distinguish clinical vs. sub-clinical levels of distress. The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the K10 in Canadian Armed Forces personnel. Data on 6700 Regular Forces personnel were obtained from the 2013 Canadian Forces Mental Health Survey. The internal consistency and factor structure of the K10 (range, 0–40) were examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to select optimal cut-offs for the K10, using the presence/absence of any of four past-month disorders as the outcome (posttraumatic stress disorder, major depressive episode, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic disorder). Cronbach’s alpha (0.88) indicated a high level of internal consistency of the K10. Results from CFA indicated that a single-factor 10-item construct had an acceptable overall fit: root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.05; 90% confidence interval (CI):0.05–0.06, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.99, weighted root mean square residual (WRMR) = 2.06. K10 scores were strongly associated with both the presence and recency of all four measured disorders. The area under the ROC curve was 0.92, demonstrating excellent predictive value for past-30-day disorders. A K10 score of 10 or greater was optimal for screening purposes (sensitivity = 86%; specificity = 83%), while a score of 17 or greater (sensitivity = 53%; specificity = 97%) was optimal for prevalence estimation of clinically significant psychological distress, in that it resulted in equal numbers of false positives and false negatives. Our results suggest that K10 scale has satisfactory psychometric properties for use as a measure of non-specific psychological distress in the military population. Public Library of Science 2018-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5919406/ /pubmed/29698459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196562 Text en © 2018 Sampasa-Kanyinga et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sampasa-Kanyinga, Hugues
Zamorski, Mark A.
Colman, Ian
The psychometric properties of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Canadian military personnel
title The psychometric properties of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Canadian military personnel
title_full The psychometric properties of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Canadian military personnel
title_fullStr The psychometric properties of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Canadian military personnel
title_full_unstemmed The psychometric properties of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Canadian military personnel
title_short The psychometric properties of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in Canadian military personnel
title_sort psychometric properties of the 10-item kessler psychological distress scale (k10) in canadian military personnel
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5919406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29698459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196562
work_keys_str_mv AT sampasakanyingahugues thepsychometricpropertiesofthe10itemkesslerpsychologicaldistressscalek10incanadianmilitarypersonnel
AT zamorskimarka thepsychometricpropertiesofthe10itemkesslerpsychologicaldistressscalek10incanadianmilitarypersonnel
AT colmanian thepsychometricpropertiesofthe10itemkesslerpsychologicaldistressscalek10incanadianmilitarypersonnel
AT sampasakanyingahugues psychometricpropertiesofthe10itemkesslerpsychologicaldistressscalek10incanadianmilitarypersonnel
AT zamorskimarka psychometricpropertiesofthe10itemkesslerpsychologicaldistressscalek10incanadianmilitarypersonnel
AT colmanian psychometricpropertiesofthe10itemkesslerpsychologicaldistressscalek10incanadianmilitarypersonnel